Holocaust Denier

Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5u6nvk-holocaust-denier.html

Their 6,000,000 Never Existed – Started 18 years before Hitler assumed power. By, Eli James

Jewish propagandists have entirely reversed the reality of the situation using their control of the media, and have blamed the Germans for starting the war and committing all the alleged atrocities, when in reality the Germans and their allies were the most disciplined, honorable and righteous forces fighting in that fratricidal Jewish-instigated war. The German people and their allies were the ones who experienced a genuine holocaust – a real genocide – during WWII, not the Jewish population of Europe.

The simple fact of the matter is that the “Holocaust” narrative – 6 million Jews persecuted, abused, and systematically exterminated by “those evil Nazis” during WWII – endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the Jewish-owned mass media, Hollywood and “entertainment” complex, and educational and political establishment is 100% bogus in virtually all respects. The Germans simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, clearly and correctly recognizing them as an alien, hostile and treacherous force working to subvert, pollute and destroy the German nation and Western civilization.

The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the genocidal Allied war effort, to establish the rogue-terrorist State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against its neighbors, to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations from Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future.

Jews have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense, with fines and imprisonment, and doing this has only hurt their credibility and soured many against their official narrative. The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever have done — and want to do in America — is criminalize not believing their improbable narrative. It is their “education” that has created doubters, which is why it continues to fail.

The Jews invented the Holocaust partially to help distract people from what the JEWS did to the Russians/Germans/Ukrainians. Instead of appearing as the most criminal oppressors, the JEW planners of all wars and the real bosses controlling our countries, are now considered “poor innocent victims” that we should never criticize.

Free yourself from the power of a lie designed to render you impotent. By instilling unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity via the “holocaust”, humanity is rendered incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticize, much less interfere with, any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The “holocaust” is also an ongoing cash cow for Jewish “holocaust survivors” through the collection of hundreds of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII reparations that continues to this day.

No one can deny that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in German occupied territories after the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER AGREEMENT during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more humanely accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese.

What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the use, of homicidal gas chambers, the manufacture of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of human derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at “death factories” where 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated and other outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.

Indeed tens of thousands (The International Committee of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews) of imprisoned Jews died during the last months of WWII due to disease, especially typhus, and starvation. After all, as the fortunes of war turn against the losing side, food and medicine become extremely scarce… and deadly scarce for those imprisoned by the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana).

Indeed there were crematoriums working overtime as a means of sanitarily disposing of disease ridden corpses, but these were built during the last year of the war and never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.

In Eli James’ 25 year career as an Identity teacher, he has spent a great deal of time and effort in exposing Jewish lies. The full scope and intent of Talmudism (Judaism) cannot be appreciated without a complete study of their historical and contemporary lies. Judaism is the religion of lies and deception. All you have to do is to compare the Laws of Moses to what the Jews actually teach and do, and you will see that they always do the opposite of what Moses and the Bible command. {“By their fruits shall ye know them.” — Matt. 7:20} The Mosaic Law forbids usury. The Jews have always been its foremost practitioners. The Bible says debts are to be forgiven every seven years (Deut. 15:12) and that a national proclamation of debt forgiveness is to be made very 50 years (Lev. 25). That is called the “Jubilee.” The Jews have yet to declare such a biblical debt forgiveness in their history. They always collect or foreclose. The Bible says that you shall not execute judgment until both sides of an issue have been disclosed. (Prov. 18:13) The Jews are always engaging in pre-emptive military strikes. In one case, an accused civilian Palestinian was sitting in his wheelchair when an Israeli missile was fired at him. He never received his day in court. The Jews have the world’s most glaring double standard. Just witness their pro-immigration stance in the USA versus their “Jews only” policy in “Israel.” Likewise, Jews are always agitating against Christmas displays while they flaunt the Menorah and Star of Solomon during Hannakuh. And, of course, they don’t complain that the Israeli State’s official religion is Judaism. In America, they are very concerned about “separation of church and state.” In Kikestan, the rabbis’ religion is the State Religion. The list of Jewish hypocrisy is a mile long; and the rabbis contribute more hypocrisy to it every day.

It is important that we understand that Judaism is a chauvinistic enterprise which has deceived the world into believing that they are “g-d’s chosen people.” This is the very lie that has “deceived the whole world.” (Rev. 12:9, 13:14) It is important to look at the Hoaxacaust in the light of this 2,000-year record of hypocrisy, lies and posturing as Israel. As far as I am concerned, this hoax is just more of the same. A Jew is a liar by religion and a thief by trade. He is taught to take advantage of non-Jews in every possible way. Every year, they recite their “Kol Nidre” prayer, which is an homage to their father of lies. The Kol Nidre declares all of their oaths to be invalid for the coming year. The Jews are the con artists and the rest of the world provides the suckers. But their house of cards is beginning to show signs of collapse, as more and more people around the world perceive the brutality of Zionism and the undue influence of the Jews in media, banking, politics, publishing, etc.

It is absolutely necessary that the so-called holocaust is presented in its true light, so that people can understand why and how the holocaust mythology came about and why it continues to this day. Of all modern Jewish lies, the holocaust is the most gigantic. Anyone who has taken even a modest amount of time to investigate the holocaust industry’s absurd claims finds that there is no substance to them whatsoever. Let me say at the outset that the hysterical charges of making soap from human fat and using human skin to make lampshades were part of the anti-German wartime propaganda of World War I. All of those claims were proven to be false and many anti-German journalists were forced to admit it and apologize for their lies after that war. But non-Jewish human beings have very short memories. These absurd claims were dredged up again as part of World War II propaganda, only this time there were no apologies.

The most significant work on this subject is the book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, by Arthur A. Butz. No rebuttal of this book has ever been made, nor will one ever be attempted, because the facts documented in that outstanding piece of research are indisputable. Again, we are faced with a situation in which we are forced to choose between Jewish lies and historical facts. Instead of public debate, organized Jewry exerts pressure on venues and on individuals to prevent free and open discussion of the facts. In countries other than America, where they don’t have a First Amendment, critics of the hoax are prosecuted and sent to jail merely for expressing their opinions. This is tyranny, plain and simple.

Dr. Robert Faurrison, commenting on the show trial of Ernst Zundel in Germany, said recently, “The Zionists want to impose the religion of the alleged ‘Holocaust’ of the Jews on the whole world. It is normal that Jews and Zionists should seek to foist such an imposture on us, for it is the sword and the shield of the Jews in general and of the Jewish State in particular. The Jews’ power stems directly from the Western world’s near-total belief in the phenomenal lie of the ‘Holocaust.’ You needn’t look any further. The Jews do not tolerate any questioning of the ‘Holocaust.’ Against the revisionists they use physical violence and judicial repression because, on the level of historical and scientific argumentation, they have been defeated hands down by the revisionists. We have been able to expose their lies, one by one. Therefore Jews and Zionists seek refuge in violence and intimidation. They treat revisionists like Palestinians.” (Nov. 2, 2005, American Free Press)

Since the subject of the holocaust is so vast, only a certain amount of space can be afforded it, therefore, I have chosen 39 historical facts — one for each whiplash that the Pharisees administered to the back of Jesus Christ — all of which are evidence against the holocaust. The one and only piece of “evidence” which the holocaust industry has ever produced is the Hitler memo which includes the expression, “final solution.” This expression, in true Hollywood and Jewish fashion, is exploded all out of proportion and our imaginations are encouraged to run wild with the bait. What Hitler meant by the “final solution” was the removal of the Jews to the island of Madagascar: a steady deportation to a place where the Jews could do little harm. The final solution was deportation, not “death camps.” And there were no death camps.

This, and everything else that the holocaust industry has ever come up with, is nothing but hearsay, lies, forged and doctored evidence. This is an indisputable fact: THERE IS ABSOLUTELY ZERO FORENSIC EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE HOLOCAUST. The idea is fabrication from beginning to end. That is why no public debate can be allowed.

Recently, I appeared on the Dr. Rebecca Carley show, she provided me with a fortieth lash against the hoaxacaust, when she said, “If the Nazis were going to gas all those Jews after they got off the boxcars, why did they bother to tattoo them?”

When we start asking simple questions like this, instead of believing the lies of the Synagogue of Satan, everything falls into place.

The Thirty-Nine Lashes Against the Hoaxacaust

Consider the source. All of the “evidence” presented at the Nuremberg trials came from two sources: Communists and Zionists. Neither of these groups could be considered impartial. All communists are liars; and all Zionists are tyrants who believe that critics of Zionism should have no public say. Many of these people, such as Leon Trotsky and David Ben-Gurion, were both communists and Zionists! Since the myth-makers cannot prove their contentions in an open, public, discussion, the only choice they have is to quash dissent by making “questioning the holocaust” a crime in every country in the world, except the USA, where freedom of speech is hanging by a thread.

2.) Zyklon B delousing gas was just that. In the days of World War II, typhus was a scourge which was transmitted by fleas and lice. Zyklon B was the treatment given to all prison internees, no matter what their religious background, because typhus had to be controlled. The claim that it was used to poison people is absurd because it was highly flammable. To use it for the purposes described by the hoaxers would have put all of the camp facilities at risk of fire and explosion. Signed confessions, extracted by Jewish and communist interrogators, say that the dead bodies, after death by gassing, were extracted by workers who were “drinking and smoking.” Rudolph Hess signed such a document, which was written for him. Hmm. Would you turn the gas on in your oven without lighting it, wait a while, and then walk into the room with a lit cigarette in your mouth? Obviously, the hoaxers had little technical knowledge when they made their ridiculous claims. In addition, the manufacturer of Zyklon B gas stated that, due to the adhesive qualities of the gas, it would require a 24-hour ventilation period before anyone could safely enter a room which had been used for such a purpose.

In addition, shaving heads was necessary in order to remove the breeding grounds of the lice.

3.) Killing six million people and disposing of their bodies is no small order for an army trying to conduct a war. Can you imagine the waste of fuel and other resources that would otherwise go to the war effort? Of the thousands of reconnaissance photos available from World War II, why are there no pictures of the fuel tanker convoys which would be needed to deliver the fuel for the crematoria? Why are there no pictures of the smokestacks, which were supposedly belching smoke day and night? The reality is that the Germans could hardly afford to waste fuel for such a purpose. Everyone agrees that the Germans kept tremendous records for efficiency and documentation purposes. Where are the records of these fuel shipments?

4.) Auschwitz, one of the largest concentration camps, had only about twenty ovens in its crematory. The crematoria at the various concentration camps were very crude and required lots of fuel and many hours to consume one body. One researcher has calculated that, given the exact number of ovens available and hours per body, the ovens would have to be going day and night from the War’s beginning until 1975 before that many bodies could be cremated, Are you beginning to comprehend the absurdity of such a claim? Yet, it is repeated by the Zionist-dominated bias machine on an almost daily basis and it is force-fed to our school children at taxpayer expense and Zionist urging.

5.) If the bodies were not cremated as many hoaxers suggest, then where are the skeletons of all these bodies? Surely a few dozen would have turned up by now. Or did the Germans find some super-secret body disposal system that no one yet knows of?

6.) Would the Germans go out of their way to provide fuel for the crematoria when their airplanes and tanks were desperately in need of fuel? Not once have I heard anyone accuse the Germans of being stupid. Toward the end of the war, the Germans lost battles because lack of fuel. Would they be so stupid is to redirect fuel to the camps for “the ovens” when battles are at stake?

7.) Jews were singled out for special interrogation because so many of them were communists. The camp directors had to determine whether these Jews were harmless or dangerous – whether they would make reliable workers or just be troublemakers. Those who were determined to be useful workers were allowed many privileges, including the formation of orchestras. If the Jews were automatically gassed (killed), how would any of these privileges be considered, let alone established? The mere fact that there are so many Jewish survivors of concentration camps is evidence against the hoax.

8.) During the entire length of the War, the International Red Cross had constant access to the concentration camps. They delivered mail and packages containing food and clothing. The International Red Cross, despite this constant presence, never once filed a complaint or report about “the ovens of Auschwitz” or any other camp. It truly begs credulity to think that not a single Red Cross agent ever became suspicious, unless, of course, there was nothing to be suspicious about.

9.) The Nuremberg trials were conducted by the OSS (Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA) at the behest of the Zionist International. The Israeli State did not yet exist. The vast bulk of “evidence” was provided by the pro-Zionist Soviet Union. Neither of these two organizations could possibly be considered fair or trustworthy. Again, consider the source.

10.) Confessions were obtained under duress and torture. “It was this same War Crimes Branch which itself administered the nightmarish trials at Dachau, where prisoners were beaten, kicked, starved, and brutalised by Jewish-American jailers.”– Richard Harwood, from Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials, p. 14. In true gangland style, the accused were told that their family members would be hurt or killed if they did not cooperate. Techniques of interrogation included beatings, starvation, testicle smashing and other forms of torture. The German prisoners were often so badly beaten that they could not be brought into the courtroom for fear of demonstrating their adverse treatment. The State of Israel today continues to use torture and murder as part of their terrorist campaign. Amnesty International has repeatedly cited the Israeli State for such violations of human rights.

11.) There were no more than 4 million Jews living in Nazi-occupied territory during the War. Most Jews had left Germany before the war started. As the Nazi army advanced, the Jews fled rather than be captured. On June 30, 1965, the West German government announced that 3,375,000 Jewish “holocaust survivors” had applied for reparations. Now, if we subtract 3,375,000 from 4,000,000, that leaves 625,000 unaccounted for. If we take 625,000 and add a zero to the figure, we arrive at the fictitious and truly fantastic six million lie.

12.) According to the World Almanac of 1947, the world population of Jews in 1939 was 15,688,259. These figures were supplied to the Almanac by the American Jewish Committee. Then, the Jewish-owned New York Times of Feb. 22,1948 listed the Jewish population in Palestine as 600,000 to 700,000; and for the rest of the world, the Jewish population is listed as 15,600,000 to 18,700,000. If we add the two lower figures together, we get a minimum total of 16,200,000 Jews world-wide, which is still a net increase in the world Jewish population of at least 500,000. If six million Jews had really died, then the total should have been 10,200,000.

But since the whole six million myth was just in the process of being fabricated by the world Zionist propaganda machine, these accurate figures came out before the hoaxacaust could be subtracted from the equation. Considering the fact that populations generally decrease during times of war – which it most certainly did for the German people and other nationalities – it is quite astounding that the Jewish population actually increased during this time. The fact is that the vast majority of Jews simply relocated to other parts of the world: Palestine, Russia, America, South America, etc.

13.) According to a pamphlet by Dr. E.R. Fields, entitled Was There Really a Holocaust?, the Red Cross reported in 1946 that of registered Jewish camp inmates, no more than 300,000 could have died. In item #11 above, we were willing to grant that possibly 625,000 were unaccounted for. If half of them died in the concentration camps and the other half died or disappeared to some other country, then our figures agree.

14.) Heinrich Himmler, Chief Commandant of the Concentration Camps, issued an order, dated Dec. 28, 1942, stating: “The death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.” – from Reitlinger’s book,The Final Solution. Ladies and gentlemen, the Germans were fighting a war, and they needed the productive capacity of the inmates of the camps to produce war material. An extermination policy would have shifted vital resources away from production to waste. Isn’t this holocaust claim incredible just from this consideration alone?

15.) One of the Nuremberg documents, a letter of April 10, 1943, was issued by Oswald Pohl, the head of the Economic Administration of the concentration camps. After addressing the above-cited order by Himmler, the mortality rate of the camps had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June, 1943. Given an extermination policy, why would there be any concern for mortality rates?

16.) Numerous claims of the hoaxers have been amended over time because the claims were obviously exaggerated or invented. In April 1975, Simon Wiesenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust Center was forced to admit in the paper, Books and Bookmen, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.” At that time, Auschwitz and other camps were still in the possession of the Soviets, who would not allow serious researchers into these camps to validate holocaust claims. We expect that, with full disclosure, Mr. Wiesenthal will be forced to admit that no gassing ever took place in any camp.

17.) The Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war. When asked if they witnessed any alleged “gassings,” the response was negative. From Red Cross document #9925, June, 1946, the entry states: “The detainees themselves have not spoken of them.” How can you gas six million Jews and nobody notices?

18.) Photos of emaciated bodies, both alive and dead, are not proof of an extermination campaign. The fact is that toward the end of the war, the Allies were bombing railroads and roads to the point of obliteration. This meant that valuable food, medicine, Red Cross packages, and other supplies were no longer reaching the camps. This was the real reason for the malnutrition, not to mention the serious side effects of malnutrition, which would be an increase in all types of disease.

The same thing happened in America during the Civil War. Northern prisoners in the Southern camp of Andersonville were also emaciated to the point of being only skin and bone. The commander of the camp, at his trial, said that he simply had no supplies with which to feed the inmates and he was not allowed to set them free. Pictures of these prisoners could easily be substituted for WWII inmates and no one would know the difference.

One thing we know for sure: The Jews are good at writing captions.

Please note that the published photos of concentration camp inmates show mainly and some overfed people lining up for the showers. All of the photos of dead bodies being bulldozed show emaciated bodies. If they were gassed and killed immediately, as the hoaxers claim, there would be some photographic evidence of well-fed people being bulldozed into graves. There is none.

19.) In 1943, the SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant Karl Koch for mistreating and executing prisoners. He was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgan and was executed for his crimes. If there were an extermination policy in force, would they bother trying and executing Commandant Koch? Again, these were work camps designed to assist the war effort. An extermination policy would have required tremendous resources and effort. It would have disrupted the crucial work that was going on and it would have risked undermining the war effort.

20.) Cremating 6,000,000 bodies in order to dispose of the evidence would have left 15,000 tons of ashes. No such volume of ashes was ever found, and no air reconnaissance ever revealed enormous clouds of smoke, and certainly there was never any such total of bodies found. It is only when one considers the enormous lack of evidence of a holocaust – all the physical matter that would have been left over from such a campaign (six million corpses?!!!!) and the sheer magnitude of such an undertaking – then the hoax becomes obvious. It is only the hoaxers themselves and those who have not really thought about the physical details who believe in this tragic farce.

It is quite probable that the Germans did not have enough fuel to consume anywhere near that amount of bodies. One of the hoaxers, Mr. Henri Michel, editor-in-chief of the Revue d’Histoire De La Seconde Guerre Mondial, exclaimed of Auschwitz: “This camp was the most international and the most western of the death factories, and its soil is enriched with the ashes of 4,000,000 corpses.” — p. 3. The dust cloud of crematoria smoke from such a volume of corpses would certainly have prompted some aerial reconnaissance photos, don’t you think? Where is the evidence? Why is there not one single photo of the crematoria smokestacks belching out their tons of ashes?

21.) William L. Shirer, one of those authors who continued the hoaxacaust story in his book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, was forced to admit in a footnote on the crematoria: “…the measurements are those which are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design intended for small cemeteries, and would be unsuitable for mass burning.” This footnote occurs on p. 972 of the German edition only. The rest of the world is still in the midst of the Zionist Dark Age.

22.) Thies Christopherson, a German soldier and author stated: “I was at Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.” Now, remember, this man does not practice the religion of lies. His statement was proven to be true when, in 1960, Auschwitz was opened to tourists and no gas chamber could be found. What a disappointment this must have been for the tourists! Later, in order to make up for this communist oversight (they didn’t have much experience at developing capitalist-style theme parks, like Disneyland), the Soviets built one themselves! No doubt, the money for construction was provided by some Zionist or rabbinical organization.

23.) The so-called Diary of Anne Frank was not written by Anne Frank at all. Photocopies of the supposed manuscript show two distinct styles of handwriting, one which is not handwriting at all but printing, and the other a very smooth handwriting angled at two o’clock. At least half of the manuscript was handwritten in ballpoint pen. The ballpoint pen, invented during WWII, was not commercially available until after the war. In addition, the American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, sued Anne Frank’s father and won an award of $50,000 for his participation in the writing of “Anne Frank’s” supposed diary. This fact was only brought to light because one Jew tried to cheat another.

24.) Although death by starvation and disease had increased toward the end of the war, the videos of huge piles of dead bodies in civilian clothing were most often footage which was filmed in Dresden. Dresden was devastated by the firebombing raids of the Allies on February 13 and 14, 1945. This was one of the greatest wartime atrocities in history, because Dresden had become, in effect, a large refugee camp for German women, children, wounded soldiers, and old men. Dresden was one of Germany’s main artistic centers and had virtually no industry located in its vicinity. The Allies knew this and yet they bombed the city mercilessly for two nights, apparently to dispose of war ordnance which would otherwise go to waste, for Germany at that point was a defeated nation and the war was nearing its end. Why not kill as many unarmed civilians as you can? Who will know?

The German refugees thought that Dresden would be a safe haven because of its lack of industry. They were, sadly, wrong. They could not imagine that there would be such immense Zionist bloodlust in command of the U.S. and British military. You can imagine the horror of those who thought they would be safe in Dresden until the end of the war! The war criminals have successfully blocked out this war crime from the history books; but I am sure that Yahweh God will remember those who are responsible.

25.) The Nuremberg trials were an absolute farce. One of the most damning conditions of the trials agreed to by the Allies in the August 1945 London Agreement was “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply, to the greatest possible extent, expeditious and non-technical procedure, and shall submit any evidence which it deems to have probative value.”

In other words, let’s railroad these “war criminals” as quickly as possible, so we can go home and collect our medals. How would you like to be tried by a court which does not abide by “rules of evidence?” A mere technicality, you say? Can you see the kangaroos hopping around? Except, these kangaroos have hooked noses and wear yarmulkas.

26.) The fact that American Jews were allowed to be prosecutors and judges is a travesty in itself. The fact that many of them, if not all, were merely instruments of the Zionist International makes the entire proceeding suspect because of a lack of impartiality. No court would consider it impartial if an agent of the accuser were to be allowed to be a prosecutor or a judge. Yet, this is exactly what happened at the Nuremberg trials. Unfortunately, the American people were not aware of these shady Zionist dealings. They assumed, as people still assume today, that the Nuremberg trials were held in accordance to standard procedures.

Regarding the London Agreement, Harwood says: “…the same people who drew up the arrangements for Nuremberg promptly had themselves appointed as prosecutors and judges. Nikitchenko and Falco became judges. Jackson was American Chief Prosecutor, Fyfe was Deputy-Chief British Prosecutor. Thus, virtually the same people were judges, prosecution, and court.” –p. 14. And you were told that the Nuremberg trials were fair and impartial?

27.) Incriminating documents were simply fabricated by the Soviets. In his opening speech at the War Crimes Tribunal, Chief Prosecutor Robert H. Jackson appeared to be quoting from a document which he ascribed to Baron Werner von Fritsch, the pre-war Commander-in-Chief of the German Armed Forces. In fact, he was quoting from a typewritten document of unknown origin. No original document was ever produced. (You can imagine how many clerks and other military personnel were recruited by the Zionists, at U.S. and British expense, to produce “documents.” Oops! I shouldn’t encourage you to use your imagination. There’s been too much of that already! Even if you’ve only heard the Zionist version of these events, it would only be prudent to exercise some common sense and good old-fashioned skepticism before accepting their story without criticism. It seems that only the Jews routinely get away without scrutiny. Why is that?)

28.) Budd Schulberg, Jewish film producer, was recruited by the OSS to produce the photographic and film “evidence” at Nuremberg. Again, lack of impartiality at its worst. He received a military reward for his efforts. Surprising that he didn’t get an Academy Award as well! The Jews of Russia (Khazaria), America, Britain and Israel were the prosecution, the judge, the jury, the newspaper reporters and the film crew. The poor, persecuted Jew has no influence at all! Why do the goyim hate him so?

29.) Paul Rassinier, author of The Drama of the European Jews, relates that many of the hoaxers, authors who had profited from the hoax, could not verify their claims. One author, Dr. Miklos Nyiszli, claimed to have been to Aushwitz but gave travel directions which made absolutely no sense. Professor Rassinier attempted to contact Dr. Nyiszli about such discrepancies and received from him a reply through a Mr. Tibere Kremer. As it turned out, Dr. Nyiszli had long since died, so even the reply was a forgery. Says Dr. Rassinier: “…this dead witness – another one – was peculiar enough himself to write to me after his death. And so Mr. Tibere Kremer’s silence is understandable. No further comment.”– p. 41. This incident should give the reader an idea of the quality of the “evidence” which has been presented in the Hoaxacaust literature.

When faced with a mountain lies, at least some statements must be true, right? Not necessarily. It is quite possible that it is all fabrication.

30.) Prof. Rassinier’s book is a detailed examination of Jewish populations in virtually every country of Europe, including Poland and Russia, from 1931 to 1945. According to Rassinier’s statistics, in1931 Europe had 9,777,500 documented Jews (figures from the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation). The population that remained in these locations in 1945 was 4,250,000. The emigrants who left Europe altogether is numbered at 4,416,608. These people went to three main locations: Palestine (the Israeli state had not yet been created), Central Asia (Soviet Union) and the United States. So, the total, documented numbers of living European Jews in1945, according to Rassinier, was 8,666,608. If we subtract the documented number of survivors from the documented pre-war population, we have a total of l,003,392 unaccounted for. Of these, a certain number must have died from causes unrelated to the war. If we grant that half of them died from such causes, then we have a total of about 500,000 Jews who perished in the war. This is consistent with our previous totals from items 11 and 13.

31.) At the Nuremberg trials, Philip Auerbach, the Jewish attorney-general for post-war Bavaria was denounced by SS General Otto Ohlendorf. Auerbach had claimed the absurd figure of 11 million Jews having suffered in the concentration camps. “Ohlendorf lived long enough to see Auerbach convicted for embezzlement and fraud (forging documents purporting to show huge payments of compensation to non-existent people) before his own execution took place in 1951.”– p. 10-11, The True History of “The Holocaust,” Did Six Million Really Die?- by the Institute for Historical Review.

32.) It has been frequently reported by American prisoners of war that the Germans treated them much more humanely than the Japanese. The same is true for the civilian prisoners in the concentration camps. Many of these people were arrested for being communist spies. Hundreds of affidavits described the circumstances at the camps as “humane.” “One Berta Schirotschin, who worked at the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates…received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning…The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940 until April 29th, 1945, also testified on March 21st, 1946 that prisoners there received good treatment.” –p. 21, Did Six Million Really Die?

33.) Elie Wiesel has a poor memory. According to the New York Times of Sunday, January 4, 1987, Wiesel recalled “the day the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz.” Previously, in a speech to the National Press Club in Washington D.C., in April, 1983, Wiesel “noted that on April 15, 1945, he was one of the survivors liberated at Dachau by the U.S. Army.”- Jewish Telegraph Agency, April 11, 1983. “Oy, vey! I remember it like it vas yesterday” we can hear him sighing. Is this two lies or only one? Wiesel would have the distinction of being the only prisoner of war to be liberated from two different camps. Talk about bragging rights! The father of lies is truly proud of this weasel.

34.) In flagrant violation of the principle of freedom of speech, the Zionists impose their will on every organization they possibly can in order to prevent people from speaking out against the hoax. In Germany, it is against the law to deny the holocaust. Numerous people have been imprisoned for making public statements against the mythology.This fact should infuriate anyone who believes in freedom of speech.

35.) The holocaust industry makes millions of dollars every year promoting this holocaust trash. In literary circles, it is still a “hot ticket.” Truth be damned. Money talks.

36.) The Soviets brought out a bunch of “human skin” artifacts and “human soap” (presumably dusting off the trunks from their WWI displays), but the Tribunal chose not to pursue the matter any further. Of course, the myth was dredged up by many other hoaxers. The so-called “Judischer Fett” displays have been quietly removed from the world’s various “holocaust museums.” With the advent of DNA testing, these bars of soap “made from Jewish fat” are, of course, subject to testing. I would suspect that an independent laboratory would find that these bars of soap were made from hogfat or beef tallow. Germar Rudolf suggested to me that the Germans already had a process for making synthetic soap, so that DNA testing would produce no results.

37.) One of the chief presiding judges, Charles F. Wennerstrum, denounced the proceedings:

“If I had known seven months ago what I know today, I would never have come here…Obviously, the victor in any war is not the best judge of the war crime guilt…The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions…the defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case [this is a violation of the “Disclosure“ principle of American justice]…also abhorrent to the American sense of justice is the prosecution’s reliance upon self-incriminating statements made by the defendants while prisoners for more than 2&1/2 years and repeated interrogations without the presence of counsel.” -Harwood, p. 39, 40. But we are not dealing with the American sense of justice. We are dealing with the Talmudic, Zionist sense of justice. Dare we call it Satanic in origin? Judge Wennerstrum went to Nuremberg expecting to dispense justice. Instead, he was asked to rubber stamp a show trial.

38.) Many prisoners of the War Crimes Tribunal were kept in prison, held without charges being filed for months. This included even the wives of the suspects. (Harwood, p. 57.)

39.) Holocaust propaganda has changed with the times. Truth is not flexible. Lies are. No consistent flow of information has ever been established by the hoax industry. New charges and claims arise, all without any substantiation. Old ones dissolve, depending upon which charges have been refuted or not. We all know that the original story was that the Germans kept their “extermination program” a secret. How else could it have happened, anyway? Recently, the hoaxers, contradicting this theory, have claimed that it was common knowledge in those days that the exterminations were going on, but that nobody did anything about it. This claim has been fabricated for the sole purpose of trying to indict Pope Pius XII for “not helping the Jews.” But how can you prevent something that isn’t happening?

I remember very clearly as a child around 1954 standing in a mom-and-pop grocery store in Chicago at the intersection of Kenmore and Dickens. The radio was playing and a special news announcement came up. Two Jewish women were reacting to the radio news story, which was about gassings during the holocaust. I will never forget what the one woman said to the other: “If I had known they were being gassed, I would have never gotten on the train.” So, obviously, six million others didn’t know about it either! And she also survived, whatever camp she was in; and, from her statement, she did not witness any gassings either, because this was the first she had heard about it! Sooner or later, the liar gets caught in his lies. The fact that he owns all the newspapers will not prevent this eventuality.

Never underestimate the power of the BIG LIE. The Jews are the masters of it. My personal opinion is the Zionists decided to promote this myth in order to cover up their own involvement with Nazi Germany in transferring Jews from Germany to Palestine. They needed a smoke screen and a continuous barrage of propaganda to clamp the lid down on any criticism of their WWII maneuverings. The more newspaper space that is taken up by their lies, the less room there is for the truth. As the previous stories have revealed, the Zionists have much to hide.

And while Hitler talked a good game and said many things in defense of Christ and Country that the average person would agree with (He was more beloved by the Germans than Trump is by Americans today..) He was not a “good” guy.

He was an occultist!

Arthur R. Butz’s The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (2003) challenges the historical account of the Holocaust. The book presents a detailed analysis of various sources, including trial transcripts, witness testimonies, and wartime documents, arguing that the evidence for systematic extermination is fabricated or misinterpreted. Butz alleges that the narrative of mass gassings was largely a postwar construction, driven by political agendas and wartime propaganda. He focuses on inconsistencies and contradictions in the existing historical record, proposing alternative explanations for events at Auschwitz and other camps.

AI gave a warning about this book: It is crucial to approach this source with extreme caution and a critical awareness of its deeply flawed and harmful nature.

Briefing Doc: The Hoax of the Twentieth Century

Source:

• Butz, Arthur R. The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Theses & Dissertation Press, 2003.

Author:

• Arthur R. Butz, a known Holocaust denier. This source presents a highly controversial and widely debunked perspective on the Holocaust.

Main Themes:

• He questions the number of Jewish victims, the methods of extermination, and the motivations behind the Nazi regime’s actions.
• Challenging the Legitimacy of War Crimes Trials: The book argues that the Nuremberg Trials and subsequent war crimes trials were politically motivated and lacked legal jurisdiction. Butz casts doubt on the evidence presented and the testimonies given, suggesting they were coerced or fabricated.
• Highlighting Inconsistencies and “Alternative” Interpretations: Butz focuses on perceived discrepancies in historical accounts, witness testimonies, and physical evidence related to the Holocaust. He offers alternative, and often implausible, explanations for events and documentation.

Important Ideas and Facts:

• Questioning the Six Million Figure: Butz disputes the widely accepted estimate of six million Jewish victims. He cites figures from Jewish sources that suggest a lower number, failing to acknowledge the context and methodology behind these figures.
• Disputing the Existence of Gas Chambers: A central argument in the book is the denial of the existence of gas chambers as a systematic method of extermination. He misinterprets technical documents, misrepresents eyewitness accounts, and offers alternative explanations for the function of structures like the “Vergasungskeller.”
• Casting Doubt on Witness Testimonies: Butz dismisses many survivor testimonies as unreliable, suggesting they were influenced by psychological trauma or external pressures. He particularly targets the testimony of Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz, claiming it was obtained under duress.
• Downplaying Anti-Semitism in Nazi Ideology: While acknowledging anti-Jewish measures, the book attempts to downplay the centrality of anti-Semitism in Nazi ideology. Butz argues that the “Final Solution” was not a pre-meditated plan of extermination but rather a result of wartime circumstances.

Quotes:

• On the Nuremberg Trials: “The ‘war crimes trials,’ which the victors in World War II conducted, mainly of Germans but also of many Japanese, were precedent-shattering in their scope and in the explicitness of the victorious powers’ claims to some sort of legal jurisdiction in respect of laws or understandings which did not exist at the time they were allegedly broken by the Axis powers.”
• On the Six Million Figure: “(…) it is good news for me […] this ensures me staying out. What they can do that I have not done I cannot imagine.” Long miscalculated on the last point, for the WRB eventually did a consider-* able amount: It managed to inflate the number of Jewish “victims” of the war from about one million to about six million!”
• On the Interpretation of “Extermination”: “Naturally, the same observation may be made in connection with public declarations of Nazi leaders, but there is an additional point to be made in this connection. Very often the Jews were referred to via the German word das Judentum, one of whose correct translations is “Jewry,” but which can also mean “Judaism” or even “Jewishness” or “the idea of Jewishness.”
• On the Vergasungskeller: “I have not located the Vergasungskeller in the sewage plants. Rather, I have listed five senses in which generation of, or treatment with, a gas comes up in sewage technology.”

Key Concerns:

• Lack of Academic Rigor: The book lacks proper citations, relies on questionable sources, and fails to engage with the vast body of scholarly literature on the Holocaust.
• Distortion of Historical Evidence: Butz manipulates historical documents, misrepresents data, and twists the meaning of testimonies to fit his predetermined conclusions.
• Ethical Implications: This book contributes to the dangerous and harmful spread of Holocaust denial, trivializing the suffering of millions and undermining efforts to combat anti-Semitism.

This briefing doc aims to provide a summary of the main themes and arguments presented in “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.” 

Arthur R. Butz is a professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University, and author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, a book denying the Holocaust.

Butz attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from which he received both his Bachelor of Science and, in 1956, his Master of Science degrees. In 1965 he received his Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Minnesota. His doctoral dissertation considered a problem in control engineering.

n 1976, Butz published The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, which denies that Nazi Germany tried to exterminate the Jews during the Holocaust. In 2006, fifty of Butz”s colleagues from the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science faculty signed a censure describing Butz”s Holocaust denial as “an affront to our humanity and our standards as scholars”. The letter also called for Butz to “leave our Department and our University and stop trading on our reputation for academic excellence.” University President Henry South. Bienen issued the following statement: Butz is a Holocaust denier who has made similar assertions previously.

His latest statement, like his earlier writings and pronouncements, is a contemptible insult to all decent and feeling people.

While I hope everyone understands that Butz”s opinions are his own and in no way represent the views of the University or me personally, his reprehensible opinions on this issue are an embarrassment to Northwestern. There is no question that the Holocaust is a well-documented historical fact.

The University has a professorship in Holocaust Studies endowed by the Holocaust al Foundation. Northwestern offers courses in Holocaust Studies and organizes conferences of academic scholars who teach in areas relating to the Holocaust.

In addition, Northwestern hosts a summer Institute for Holocaust and Jewish Civilization.

In short, Northwestern University has contributed significantly to the scholarly research of the Holocaust and remains committed to doing southern Butz is a tenured associate professor in electrical engineering. Butz has made clear that his opinions are his own and at no time has he discussed those views in class or made them part of his class curriculum.

Therefore, we cannot take action based on the content of what Butz says regarding the Holocaust – however odious it may be – without undermining the vital principle of intellectual freedom that all academic institutions serve to protect. Henry South. Bienen President.

He achieved tenure in 1974 and currently teaches classes in control system theory and digital signal processing. And most recently, a fellowship in the political science department has been established in my name by the Holocaust al Foundation. Like all faculty members, he is entitled to express his personal views, including on his personal web pages, as long as he does not represent such opinions as the views of the University.

Source

‘THE HOLOCAUST’: The Biggest and Most Destructive Lie of the 20th Century

https://prabook.com/web/arthur.butz/2601522

Eli James