Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5j8ln9-the-1988-anomaly-theory.html
Is a speculative concept that suggests a significant event occurred in the year 1988, potentially altering the course of history or even the reality we perceive. This theory is often associated with the Mandela Effect, a phenomenon where individuals recall events or details differently than they actually occurred.
While there’s no scientific evidence to support this theory, it’s often discussed in online forums and communities as a thought-provoking idea. Some proponents of the theory propose that:
- A catastrophic event may have occurred in 1988, leading to a timeline shift or alternate reality.
- A significant technological advancement might have been suppressed or hidden, affecting our understanding of history.
- A collective hallucination or mass delusion could have led to widespread false memories about the year 1988.
There is no specific event universally agreed upon as the “1988 anomaly.” The theory is more about the idea of a significant, potentially world-altering event occurring in that year, rather than a particular incident.
Some proponents of the theory might point to certain historical events, cultural phenomena, or personal experiences that seem inconsistent or contradictory. However, these are often subjective interpretations and lack concrete evidence to support a widespread, timeline-altering event.
Yes, CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) was active in 1988.
CERN, a leading international research organization in particle physics, was already well-established by that time. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a massive particle accelerator, was not yet operational, but CERN was conducting other experiments and research.
Yes, CERN did have a smaller hadron collider operating in 1988. It was called the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS). The SPS was a circular particle accelerator used for a variety of experiments, including those related to high-energy physics.
The SPS played a crucial role in CERN’s research program during the 1980s and early 1990s, contributing to significant discoveries in particle physics.
CERN has a vast history of experiments, and while some are well-known, many others may not be as widely documented.
However, I can provide you with some information about CERN’s activities during that time:
- The Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS): As mentioned earlier, the SPS was the primary particle accelerator at CERN in 1988. It was used for various experiments, including those related to:
- Proton-antiproton collisions: These collisions helped scientists study the properties of the W and Z bosons, fundamental particles that carry the weak force.
- Heavy ion collisions: These collisions were used to study the properties of quark-gluon plasma, a state of matter that existed shortly after the Big Bang.
- Other experiments: CERN was likely conducting other experiments as well, possibly related to:
- Neutrino physics: CERN has a long history of neutrino research, and it’s possible that experiments were underway in 1988 to study the properties of neutrinos.
- Fixed-target experiments: These experiments involved colliding a beam of particles with a stationary target. CERN conducted many fixed-target experiments during the 1980s and 1990s.
In 1988, classified operations were happening:
Stealth technology: Research into stealth aircraft and other stealthy platforms was likely ongoing, with the goal of developing aircraft and ships that were difficult to detect by radar and other sensors.
Directed energy weapons: Experiments with lasers and other directed energy weapons may have been conducted, with the aim of developing non-lethal or lethal weapons that could strike targets at a distance.
Cyber warfare: Early research into cyber warfare capabilities may have begun, focusing on offensive and defensive techniques for protecting computer networks and systems.
Advanced propulsion systems: Research into advanced propulsion systems, such as nuclear propulsion or ion propulsion, may have been conducted to support future space exploration missions.
Space-based surveillance: Development of satellites with advanced sensors and imaging capabilities for intelligence gathering and surveillance purposes.
Genetic engineering: Research into genetic engineering techniques, including recombinant DNA technology, may have been ongoing, with potential applications in medicine, agriculture, and other fields.
Bioweapons: While it’s important to note that the development of bioweapons is generally considered unethical and illegal, it’s possible that some research into biological agents with potential military applications may have been conducted in secret.
Quantum cryptography: Early work on quantum cryptography was being conducted, exploring the potential to use quantum mechanics to create unbreakable encryption methods.
Quantum computing: While still in its infancy, research into quantum computing began to gain momentum, with scientists exploring the potential of using quantum mechanics to perform calculations that would be impossible with classical computers.
Quantum teleportation: Experiments were being conducted to demonstrate quantum teleportation, a process where the quantum state of one particle can be transmitted to another particle, even over long distances.
Cern was colliding particles and experimenting in quantum teleportation in 1988.
There is a connection
While there’s no concrete evidence to support a timeline shift, let’s consider some intriguing possibilities:
- CERN and Particle Accelerators:
- Quantum Entanglement: Experiments at CERN and other research facilities have explored quantum entanglement, a phenomenon where particles become connected regardless of distance. Some theories suggest that manipulating quantum entanglement on a large scale could potentially lead to unintended consequences, including disruptions to the fabric of spacetime.
- Unexpected Discoveries: The pursuit of new particles and forces through particle accelerators could inadvertently lead to discoveries that challenge our current understanding of physics. These discoveries might have unforeseen consequences, potentially affecting the timeline.
- Advanced Technologies and Experiments:
- Time Travel Research: While there’s no known scientific method for time travel, it’s possible that classified research or theoretical explorations could have led to unintended consequences.
- Artificial Intelligence: Advancements in AI could lead to unforeseen developments, especially if AI were to become self-aware or surpass human intelligence. This could potentially disrupt the natural order of things.
- Cosmic Events and Anomalies:
- Solar Flares or Supernovae: Massive cosmic events could potentially affect the Earth’s magnetic field or other fundamental forces, leading to disruptions in the timeline.
- Dark Matter and Dark Energy: Our understanding of these mysterious components of the universe is still limited. It’s possible that interactions with dark matter or dark energy could have unforeseen consequences.
One of these three events or possibly an experimentation with 2 combined could have led to a catastrophe. This might explain why 1980’s nestalgia is still hot items today. Like legos, Ghostbusters, He-Man and other 1980’s toys that are still on the shelf.
The theory also suggests that every 12 years, we shift again as whatever happened in 1988, we created a reocurring quantum loop.
The 12-Year Quantum Loop: A Deeper Dive
Quantum theory suggests that when we play with subatomic particles by rearranging their natural order, which exist in multiple states, places and time, we could alter our own timeline which in turn creates a loop whereas every certain amount of years, the phenomenon happens again. This is called manipulating quantum entanglement.
Core Concepts of the Theory
- Cyclic Nature of Reality: The theory proposes that reality operates in a cyclical pattern, with a repeating loop of 12 years. This could suggest that events or experiences may recur or be subtly altered within this cycle.
- Quantum Fluctuations: Quantum mechanics suggests that at the subatomic level, particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously until observed. The 12-year loop theory might propose that these quantum fluctuations could influence macroscopic events or even the fabric of reality itself.
- Timeline Shifts or Parallel Realities: The theory might suggest that the 12-year loop could lead to timeline shifts, parallel realities, or subtle alterations in history.
Anecdotal Evidence and Speculations
While there’s no concrete scientific evidence, proponents of the theory often point to anecdotal observations or perceived inconsistencies in history as supporting evidence. These might include:
- Recurring Events: The idea that certain events or patterns seem to repeat every 12 years.
- Mandela Effect: The Mandela Effect, where individuals have vivid memories of events that didn’t occur, could be interpreted as evidence of a timeline shift or alternate reality.
- Cultural Cycles: The theory might suggest that cultural trends, technological advancements, or social movements may follow a cyclical pattern.
Challenges and Criticisms
- Lack of Scientific Evidence: The theory is primarily based on speculation and anecdotal evidence. There is no scientific consensus or concrete data to support it.
- Subjectivity of Perception: Many of the observations cited as evidence, such as the Mandela Effect, are subjective and can be influenced by individual memory, biases, or misinformation.
- Alternative Explanations: The phenomena observed could be explained by other factors, such as misremembering events, cultural biases, or the spread of misinformation.
It’s possible that some organizations were experimenting with quantum entanglement in 1988. While specific details might be classified, research in this field was likely ongoing in various institutions around the world.
Here are some potential candidates:
- Government Research Laboratories: National security agencies or military research laboratories often invest in cutting-edge technologies. They might have been exploring quantum entanglement for its potential applications in cryptography or communication.
- Universities and Research Institutions: Academic institutions are often at the forefront of scientific research. Universities and research institutes may have been conducting experiments to better understand quantum entanglement and its implications.
- Private Corporations: Technology companies or research firms might have been interested in quantum entanglement for its potential commercial applications, such as developing quantum computers or secure communication systems.
In addition to quantum computers, other specialized equipment can be used to study and manipulate quantum entanglement. This includes:
- Ion traps: These devices can trap and manipulate individual ions, which can be used to create quantum bits.
- Optical lattices: These are arrays of laser light that can be used to trap and control atoms, which can also be used to create quantum bits.
- Superconducting qubits: These are made from superconducting materials and can be used to create quantum bits that are relatively stable.
Keep in mind that there have been whistleblowers that has told us that black budget programs paid for by US tax dollars are 300 years ahead in technology. In 1988, the US could have already built quantum computers that used AI to play around with ion traps and lasers which can be used to control atoms.
However, it’s important to note that there is no publicly available information confirming that any organization successfully manipulated quantum entanglement to a significant degree in 1988. The field of quantum technology has advanced significantly since then, but the early experiments were likely limited in scope and complexity.
The 12-year quantum loop disaster theory remains a speculative concept with no scientific foundation to modern academia. If it were true, they would not admit to such a catastrophe. The reason would be simple. Civil unrest and economic instability.
If it were true, then this could have triggered the Y2K panic in the year 2,000. The lie that was given to us was computers were programmed with two digits instead of four representing dates. In example, intead of 1999, the program just read 99. We were told that nothing existed in code beyond 99 as in 2000 so computers would either freeze or just give errors.
Programmers at the time of the Y2K phenomenon were laughing at this fallacy because they knew most if not all programs had four digits for the date because it would be lazy and illogical to program with 2 digits. I know this because I was working in CRM software and at Lucent technologies at the time. We all knew Y2K was some sort of government lie for a reason none of us knew what for.
So, it could be hypothesized that the lie was used for an excuse of the timeline shift as the government was not aware of what would happen. If a timeline shift occured and people were having psychological effects, the government would then use cautionary measures to purposely shut down systems all around the world to blame the hysteria on that instead of a timeline shift. Of course, nothing happened other than stories of people saying they remember things differently. Yes, there have been anecdotal reports of people remembering things differently after Y2K. These reports often fall under the umbrella of the Mandela Effect, a phenomenon where individuals have vivid memories of events or details that are inconsistent with verifiable historical records.
In 2012, the mayan calendar scare of the end of the world was buzzing. Most likely, if the quantum timeloop theory happened, the US government needed another excuse for the timeline shift. Something they could blame the mendella effect on. This would buy them some time to think of something different in the next 12 years. Now, being 2024, another timeline shift is happening. All around the world, we are seeing talks of a nuclear war and mass genocide has already started. The people are focused on the crazy political election and the fear of world war instead of this timeline adjustment.
This 1988 Anomoly Theory doesn’t seem that far fetched given the data. It also is challenging in finding any written documention or blog about it in the US and in Russia. The mandella effect to me, personally, is real for me. I do remember Mandella dying in prison. I do remember it was the Berenstein Jewish Bears and hundreds of other things like the Kennedy Assasination was in a 4 seater limo as I witnessed myself that the zepruder film changed from 4 seater to 6 right before my eyes. My reality was the governor and his wife was not present.
It would make sense given the experimentation that man continues in his search for answers. The manhattan project did not know if the atomic bomb would set off a chain reaction destroying our atmosphere, but they hit the green button anyways. Scientists warned CERN to not turn on the large hadron collider as it may create a black hole. This doesn’t give credence to the 1988 anomaly, but does show the nature of mankind. If we find something, we will break it and could destory ourselves in the process.
This could have sped up time in the process. The Bible says God would speed up time during the end of Satan’s reign to save as many as he can.
Another Theory: Continuation of Philadelphia Experiment
In 1988 or thereabouts, an “underground” videotape made its debut in the strange and enigmatic world of UFOlogy and Psychotronics: Three men mesmerized a small gathering of interested listeners in a private home on Long Island’s south shore, telling a tale that interwove stories of secret government weather control technology, mood and thought alteration by electronic means, actual mind control of subjects (willing and unwilling), transmission and reception of thought (“electronic telepathy,”) and, as if that wasn’t enough, actual teleportation of physical objects and persons to and from distant locations. This was allegedly extended into the development of a working Time Machine. The video got its name, The Truth About the Philadelphia Experiment, from the claim that, not only were these stories true and actual events, but that all of them were a continuation of, or spinoffs from, the techniques used to warp spacetime in the Philadelphia Experiment of 1943.
The “star” of the show is one Preston Nichols, a forty-ish Long Island-based microwave engineer who supposedly lost his job at AIL (an electronics defense contractor) when he began “remembering” glimpses of an “alter-ego” existence which he believed he was living, in which he was being used for his technical expertise to revamp and maintain the radar at Montauk Airbase – for a series of unofficial, secret underground experiments performed by a renegade group of scientists and military men who had originally operated out of the well-known Brookhaven National Laboratory at Upton, Long Island.
Nichols claims that, through hypnosis and brainwashing, he was made to “forget” that he was living a double life – by day a ‘mild-mannered engineer’ but by night (or during the day) he was whisked out to the supposedly-derelict Montauk radar base where he participated in some of the strangest experiments one could imagine – and that the control group ousted him from the program when snatches of these memories began to come back to him during his “normal” life. As chief technician running the Montauk radar, he would have been the resident expert on what they were doing and how they were doing it, technologically speaking. The bottom line is, Preston Nichols claims to have used a modified version of the old Montauk radar, under duress, to generate an updated Philadelphia Experiment with accomplishments far exceeding those claimed by Carl Allen in the original story.
The story goes that all was well until August 12, 1983, when a “saboteur” among the experimenters precipitated a big, hairy monstrous beast (referred to by Preston as “Junior.”) from a “thoughtform”, right out of the ether. The beast allegedly ran amok all over the base, and the only way the personnel could bring the ordeal to a halt was to disconnect the power to the radar; when that didn’t work, they supposedly chopped the power cables and radar waveguides with hatchets until the electromagnetic field lost its power and the beast faded back into the “hyperspace” from which it had been created. And why didn’t the power go down when they first tried to turn it off, necessitating the frantic hatchet-work? You guessed it: the EM field generated at Montauk had tunneled back through time to 1943, when a similar field was being generated onboard the U.S.S. Eldridge in the Philadelphia Harbour.
There was a “lock-up in hyperspace,” and one experiment was feeding the other. Anyone reading this who has seen the movie The Philadelphia Experiment has probably noticed the parallel in the idea of two experiments, forty years apart, locking up in hyperspace, with the main character having to travel back to 1943 to do a hatchet-job on the equipment aboard the Eldridge in order to shut the experiment down 1983.
The second character in the video is a retired electrical engineer by the name of Alfred D. Bielek, probably in his late 50’s or early 60’s, another Long Islander who at this writing is living in Atlanta, Georgia. Al Bielek has a unique angle in his story, which he tells during much of the video: Al claims to have been one of the actual seamen who were below decks, in the control room, operating the generators which powered the Philadelphia Experiment, aboard the Eldridge in 1943.
He and the third character in the video, Duncan Cameron, assert that they are the two seamen after whom the characters in the Hollywood movie were modeled. The characters in the movie jumped overboard when the PX was obviously getting out of control, fell through a “hyperspace tunnel,” and landed on dry ground at a desert Air Force facility in Nevada or Utah, only to find out that they were now in the year 1984 and that the scientist responsible for the 1943 PX, a “Dr. Longstreet,” was still at it (although 40 years older) in the western desert. Longstreet “ripped another hole in hyperspace” and linked up with the two-time travelers from 1943 who never did hit the water when they jumped ship.
After an initial period of rational disbelief, Bielek has now been convinced (by the persistence of Preston Nichols and by the “trauma” of having viewed the Hollywood movie for the first time) that he and Duncan Cameron are indeed the two characters in the film, and are actually brothers besides! His real name, he has discovered, is Edward Cameron, and he was “originally” born in 1916.
Al Bielek use to travel the country, giving lectures to UFO and Paranormal Phenomena groups, claiming that he and Duncan Cameron were the two sailors who jumped off the ship in 1943. Bielek goes on to tell they actually ended up at Montauk Point rather than in the western desert when Preston Nichols’ renovated radar met up with the Eldridge’s electromagnetic field through the hyper-spatial connecting link. The “Dr. Longstreet” of the movie ends up being none other than the real-life John Von Neumann, famous mathematician and computer pioneer who was deeply involved with various classified projects during WW2 and who is said to have died in 1958 (Nichols, Bielek and Cameron dispute this, claiming that Von Neumann is still alive, living in upstate New York under a different name, as a split-personality).
All three of them have now passed away; Alfred Bielek passed away on Monday, October 10, 2011, at 6:30 AM in Guadalajara, Mexico. Al was born on March 31, 1927, and was 84 years old at the time of his death. He was buried at a local cemetery in Guadalajara. Preston Nichols passed away on Friday, October 5, 2018, at 4am. Preston was born on born May 24, 1946, and was 72 when he died. He had suffered a heart attack in July followed by a stroke in September. Duncan Cameron just lost his long battle with prostate cancer and died Thursday, May 9th, 2019 and was 67 when he died. After some research, I found that Bielek is not some “Johnny-come-lately” to the UFO/paranormal field. He has been around and active in the UFO field as far back as 1966 and earlier, offering his “professional evaluation” of the Trevor James photos. Ivan T. Sanderson also refers to Mr. Bielek as a friend. In the paragraph quoted below, Sanderson is asking some “experts” to determine whether “vile vortices,” or anomalous ocean whirlpools such as are allegedly found in the Bermuda Triangle, are spaced at regular intervals around the earth’s surface.
“I first appealed to, and then assembled a number of engineers, EM specialists, and geophysicists, and presented them with our problem and what we had found out by pure research, and then gave them a set of blank globes to go to work on. I started with my very old friend, Al Bielek, an EM engineer who lives in moral chastity with a sort of harem of slide rules. I started with him because I wanted first to get the math and spherical geometry sorted out before we started the (as I then envisaged it) very arduous task of speculating upon, investigating, and ferreting out possible causes for what we already had; and it was lucky that we did so, as it turned out. All of them were also mathematicians, despite their working specialities, so that the session, which lasted a week, became interesting to say the least– to the non-mathematicians, that was.”
Here is another example that shows Bielek clearly had exposure to the Philadelphia Experiment well before all his “memories” returned
“In 1966, author Brad Steiger received a letter from Steve Yankee, a bright young college student from Michigan with whom he had been corresponding for several months. Yankee actually had in his possession a microfilmed copy of the (much sought after) Varo Manufacturing edition of the annotated version of The Case for the UFO by Morris K. Jessup. He had received this microfilm from a scientist-engineer by the name of Alfred Bielek. (This was also privately confirmed to Robert by Bielek himself.) Brad (Steiger) confirms that Al followed PX since 60s.” ~ Robert Goerman
The uninformed attendee of one of Bielek’s lectures might think he was just a nuts-and-bolt electronics engineer, until suddenly one day he began remembering that he was personally involved in the Philadelphia Experiment. On the contrary, his interests in the esoteric seem to go back a long way, at least to the mid-1960’s. While this in itself doesn’t make him a charlatan, it does tend to destroy the “innocence” he would have if he had had no previous interest in such things, and then to have it blow up in his face suddenly.
“I know Al Bielek. He has been to my home. I have questioned him from every angle and cannot determine whether or not he is telling the truth. He must have some inside information source because he knows about Project RAINBOW, an experiment in time travel. I do not know the results of RAINBOW but saw documents about its purpose. I am keeping an open mind on Bielek at this time.” – Bill Cooper
We have heard Alfred Bielek’s rendition of the PX several times, from conferences, lectures, and videos years apart; his story is essentially the same, although one person who attended both days of a two-day lecture says that Bielek, after having had a contradiction in his story pointed out to him, incorporated the updated material in his lecture the next day in such a way as to imply that there had never been a contradiction. In other words, he is a master story-teller with a sincere, respectable demeanor – you just want to believe him – and he will plagiarize any information that comes his way if it enhances his tale.
Duncan Cameron, also from the south shore of Long Island, is a younger man than Bielek, born June 29, 1951. He tends to be of few words on the videotape, and is rather Zen-like and esoteric when he does have something to say (such as “Everything and nothing is possible.”) Duncan is portrayed in the video as having gone through grueling psychological and psychic training in secret military programs, fitting him as a subject for experimentation in mind control in the Montauk project.
Duncan claims that he was one of a group of people trained for “clarity of deep thought.” His thoughts were supposedly “amplified and projected into hyperspace” via the Montauk radar and a special alien-technology chair outfitted with coils that would pick up electromagnetic signals representing the thoughts of the person occupying the chair. These signals were then highly amplified and re-broadcast by the transmitter, where they generated physical manifestations in a region of space. Duncan was trained to project his thoughts in an effort to create “Time Tunnels” whose patterns were recorded on tape so that he, too, could travel through time and space.
The timeline of these projects went right up to 1984. The same year the movie The Philadelphia Experiment came out, the plot is in 1943, United States Navy sailors David Herdeg and Jim Parker serve aboard destroyer escort USS Eldridge, docked in Philadelphia. Doctor James Longstreet and his team conduct an experiment to render the ship invisible to radar, but a malfunction causes the ship to disappear. David and Jim’s attempts to stop the experiment fail and they jump overboard to escape. They land in the future where they try and find a way back. In 1984, Longstreet has attempted to use the same technologies that were used in the Eldridge experiment to create a shield as protection from an ICBM attack. When the equipment was tested, the shielded town disappeared into “hyperspace”. David, in the future, is caught and outfitted with protective gear to destroy the machine to prevent all of this from happening again. Of course this is just fiction as they didn’t really follow the real story.
Perhaps the experiments in time and space continued up until 1988 where they actually messed up again creating what we now know as the mandella effect. This 1988 quantum hyperloop time shift theory could be the continuation of what Einstein helped to create. The Philadelphia Experiment was an alleged incident in which the USS Eldridge was made invisible and teleported from Philadelphia to Norfolk during World War II. The experiment was supposedly based on Einstein’s unified field theory, which sought to mathematically describe the relationship between gravity and electromagnetism. The Navy sponsored the experiment, believing it had military value. They created a machine on the ship that spun red mercury one way in a chamber and the other way in a bigger chamber and added electricity to create what would be considered bending space and time. The same engine that was used on the Nazi Bell that created an antigravity machine.
Play with the bull and you get the horns. Unfortunately, if true, whether one of the above scenarios, we the people suffer from their mistakes.
sources
Gemini AI
https://de173.com/the-montauk-project
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Philadelphia_Experiment_(film)