Drones Drones Drones

Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v612kkq-drones-drones-drones.html

Why now? What good does any of this do? I believe that since the people are waking up and talking about their lack of faith in government, this is a major concern for the mob, because not only are we at the point of bankruptcy by holding on to a thread and keeping it by force, the lack of faith in government leads to rebellion. The United States is huge. And not all the states are in line with the mafia’s plans. Most are, but some aren’t. So, the public needs a distraction from the thievery and the mafia are not ready to deploy their UFO extraterrestrial deception yet.

I read a great report on the Gateway Pundit that explains this phenomenon as psychological warfare. He says, “I want to recall here a couple of data points from back in the early 1950’s when the UFO mania first set in: “Walter B. Smith director of the CIA, in a memorandum for the Director of the Psychological Strategy Board, wrote: ‘the problems connected with unidentified flying objects appear to have implications for psychological warfare as well as for intelligence and operations’. Another 50’s document declassified in a FOIA release details the National Security implications stemming from the UFO phenomenon: ‘channels of communications are clogged by irrelevant reports; continued false claims lead to the ignoring of real indications of hostile actions; creation of a morbid national psychology in which skillful hostile propaganda could induce hysterical behavior and harmful distrust of duly constituted authority’.”

They don’t want harmful distrust of authority by creating a mass hysteria campaign, but a drone here and a drone there which cause no real harm along with a congress led inquiry into UAP’s instead of UFO’s combined could produce talk instead of questioning policy, our nation’s debt and a newly president coming into office. Drones and UAP’s are the perfect distraction while they continue on to Agenda 2030. More on that later.

What are these drones?

The military uses many types of drones, including the MQ-9 Reaper, a well-known, larger, and more heavily armed version of the MQ-1 Predator. It’s known for its long endurance, high-altitude operations, and ability to carry a variety of weapons.

See image 1

These have been flying over our skies for many years. No one really sees them or hears them. The General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper (sometimes called Predator B) is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV, one component of an unmanned aircraft system (UAS)) capable of remotely controlled or autonomous flight operations, developed by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems (GA-ASI) primarily for the United States Air Force (USAF). The MQ-9 and other UAVs are referred to as Remotely Piloted Vehicles/Aircraft (RPV/RPA) by the USAF to indicate ground control by humans. But these are not the drones we are looking for.

See image 2

RQ-7 Shadow Used for reconnaissance, surveillance, target acquisition, and battle damage assessment. The AAI RQ-7 Shadow is an American unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) used by the United States Army, Australian Army, Swedish Army, Turkish Air Force and Italian Army for reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition and battle damage assessment. Launched from a trailer-mounted pneumatic catapult, it is recovered with the aid of arresting gear similar to jets on an aircraft carrier. Its gimbal-mounted, digitally stabilized, liquid nitrogen-cooled electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) camera relays video in real time via a C-band line-of-sight data link to the ground control station (GCS). Again, not what people are seeing in the skies.

See image 3

ScanEagle is used by the Navy SEALs, it has a flexible catapult launch capability and a skyhook recovery system. The Boeing Insitu ScanEagle is a small, long-endurance, low-altitude unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aerial vehicle built by Insitu, a subsidiary of Boeing, and is used for reconnaissance.[1][2] The ScanEagle was designed by Insitu based on the Insitu SeaScan, a commercial UAV that was intended for fish-spotting. The ScanEagle continues to receive improvements through upgrades and changes. Again, not really what people are seeing.

See image 4

Global Hawk. First flight. Flight number 017-0001. From Palmdale, Ca to Edwards AFB. Photo by Bobbi Zapka.

RQ-4 Global Hawk is an A Class III drone that can be armed with missiles and laser-guided bombs, and has a range of over 1000 miles.

Other drones used by the military include:

See image 5

Shield AI V-BAT V-BAT is a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicle originally developed by Martin UAV, now Shield AI.

See image 6

R/MQ-8 Fire Scout is an unmanned autonomous helicopter developed by Northrop Grumman for use by the United States Armed Forces.[3] The Fire Scout is designed to provide reconnaissance, situational awareness, aerial fire support and precision targeting support for ground, air and sea forces. The initial RQ-8A version was based on the Schweizer 330, while the enhanced MQ-8B was derived from the Schweizer 333. The larger MQ-8C Fire Scout variant is based on the Bell 407.

But all of these are planes and helicopters. Nothing like the drones we are seeing that are filling the skies. The real drones people are seeing are federal defense drones. They admit to it on their website, “Having closely examined the technical data and tips from concerned citizens, we assess that the sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones. We have not identified anything anomalous and do not assess the activity to date to present a national security or public safety risk over the civilian airspace in New Jersey or other states in the northeast.”

This could also be a war strategy towards the east as if we are saying these aren’t ours and we can’t control our airspace. A sort of egging on World War III. As Breitbart reported, “As reports of mysterious drone sightings continue to pour in from across the Northeast, a military expert has shared the reasons that he believes these drones are originating from within the United States. He added, “We are telegraphing right now that we do not know where these drones are. We’re telegraphing that we can fly these drones over U.S. bases and we can’t do anything about it.”

Another hypothesis is that they are looking for a nuclear weapon that has escaped. The United States has lost 6 nuclear bombs reported by IFL Science and Taks & Purpose, “The U.S. military had 32 nuclear accidents during the Cold War, and several nuclear weapons remain unaccounted for.” One could surmise the idea of an entity that does not want Trump in office and has threatened to set one off. Intelligence could be flying around looking for the signature. My research on the mafia where the Italian families are fighting each other over New York and Chicago could give a plausible idea of such a scenario.

But this kind of thing would have happened years ago if true and I don’t see it as a plausible explanation of what we are seeing. Another thought is they are looking for signatures of UFOs that are cloaked in the cities. Doubtful. Such an idea is beyond reason as an advanced superior race would more than likely not invade around the time we can build a defense. And I know they want to use the alien deception in the future so now is a bad timing for looking for UFO signature. And the words we are hearing are not UFO, rather drones and UAP’s.

Another idea is retail delivery drones. A week ago, Amazon just released their newest drone.

See image 8

The brand-new MK30 drone underwent an aerospace design and verification process, can travel two times farther than Amazon’s previous drones, and is significantly quieter. So if you live near Amazon’s fulfillment center in Tolleson, Arizona, and purchase an eligible item weighing five pounds or less, the drone can drop off your purchase at designated areas near select addresses in 60 minutes or less.

See image 9

The holiday demands for delivery are high in New Jersey has zones that Amazon delivers to. Very coincidental that Amazon just released their latest drone and during the Christmas holiday, all drones are out in full force delivering packages. As much as I want to believe that we are finally going through the fake alien invasion, I believe the simplest answer is what people are seeing are most likely Amazon Christmas deliveries.

According to the New Herald Tribune, “For now, Amazon’s drone deliveries are limited to a small geographic area within New Jersey. However, the company has plans to scale the program across the country in 2025, with a focus on major metropolitan areas and other states where logistical challenges could benefit from drone technology.” So what are people really seeing?

According to Reuters, Witness wants answers to ‘drone on steroids’ sighting in New Jersey | REUTERS”

See video 10

A drone on steroids is what the Shield AI V-BAT is.

See image 12

There happens to be a military base on New Jersey. Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst is a well-known military installation in New Jersey. And they could have been testing the V-BAT which he could have seen. Of course the military will not admit to it as they never do when they test.

But, here is a turn of events. “Drone Wars: FAA Threatens ‘Deadly Force’ in New Drone No Fly Zones for Twenty-Two New Jersey Locales for ‘Special Security Reasons”

The FAA issued new no fly zone restrictions on Wednesday and Thursday for drones covering twenty-two locales in New Jersey through January 17, threatening “deadly force” against aircraft violating the zones if they pose an “imminent security threat.” The new drone restrictions are in addition to those already in place for Bedminster, home of one of President-elect Trump’s golf courses, and the Picatinny Arsenal in Wharton. Each zone has a radius of one nautical mile and a ceiling of four hundred feet from the ground.

The FAA released a statement Thursday about the drone restrictions, “At the request of federal security partners, the FAA published 22 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) prohibiting drone flights over critical New Jersey infrastructure.”

The threat to use deadly force against drones comes a week after Trump called on the Biden administration to shoot down the drones and the response by the Biden administration that the drones over New Jersey posed “no threat” and they were limited in what they could do.”

On Monday, a joint statement downplaying the drone scare was released by the FBI, the FAA, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense that said in part:

Having closely examined the technical data and tips from concerned citizens, we assess that the sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones. We have not identified anything anomalous and do not assess the activity to date to present a national security or public safety risk over the civilian airspace in New Jersey or other states in the northeast.

Excerpt from the NOTAM (Notice to Airmen) for Kearny, New Jersey (similar NOTAMs were posted for the other locations):

FDC 4/8541 ZNY PART 1 OF 3 NJ..AIRSPACE KEARNY, NJ..TEMPORARY FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS. DECEMBER 18 , 2024-JANUARY 17 2025 LOCAL. PURSUANT TO 49 USC 40103(B)(3), THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) CLASSIFIES THE AIRSPACE DEFINED IN THIS NOTAM AS ‘NTL DEFENSE AIRSPACE’.

PILOTS WHO DO NOT ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING PROC MAY BE INTERCEPTED, DETAINED AND INTERVIEWED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT/SECURITY PERSONNEL.

ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ACTIONS MAY ALSO BE TAKEN AGAINST A PILOT WHO DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RQMNTS OR ANY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR PROC ANNOUNCED IN THIS NOTAM: A) THE FAA MAY TAKE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION, INCLUDING IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTIES AND THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF AIRMEN CERTIFICATES; OR B) THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MAY PURSUE CRIMINAL CHARGES, INCLUDING CHARGES UNDER 49 USC SECTION 46307;

OR C) THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MAY USE DEADLY FORCE AGAINST THE AIRBORNE ACFT, IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE ACFT POSES AN IMMINENT SECURITY THREAT. PURSUANT TO 14 CFR 99.7, SPECIAL SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS (SSI), ALL UNMANNED ACFT SYSTEM (UAS) FLT OPS ARE PROHIBITED:

The locales in New Jersey covered by the NOTAMs:

Evesham, Hamilton, Bridgewater, Cedar Grove, Metuchen, North Brunswick Township, Camden, Gloucester City, Westhampton, Edison, South Brunswick, Branchburg, Sewaren. Jersey City, Harrison, Elizabeth, Bayonne, Winslow, Burlington, Clifton, Hancocks Bridge and Kearny.

Flying Magazine reported on comments by a DHS spokesperson about the new restrictions (excerpt):

…A DHS spokesperson told FLYING the TFRs were requested by critical infrastructure partners to discourage drones from flying over their assets.

Neither agency linked the restrictions to the reports of mysterious aircraft.

“We continue to assess there is no public safety threat relating to the reported drone sightings,” DHS said in a statement. “In coordination with the FAA and our critical infrastructure partners who requested temporary flight restrictions over their facilities, out of an abundance of caution, the FAA has issued temporary flight restrictions over some critical infrastructure facilities in New Jersey.”

So, any drone in certain zones will be shot down. The department of defense repeatedly says they are causing no threat. Yet the FAA says differently. Seems there is a gap in communication with American FAA and the Military. As if the military is playing around with these drones and the FAA says it’s dangerous and will blow them out of the sky. Funny, I didn’t know the FAA has the ability to shoot down drones.

Kelly River wrote a great article for Security Intelligence.

A Future Full of Drones — and the Advanced Threats They Present

In spite of being relatively new technology, drones of varying types and sizes are readily available for consumer purchase. Where there was once one to two predator drones, now there are delivery drones, hobby drones, news drones, Hollywood drones and sightseeing drones.

Drone Electronics and Operating System

Some experimentation in taking a drone apart revealed that most ready-to-ship drones come with the same electronics as a smartphone or tablet. Nearly all drone code is the same as that found in Android except for open-source coding efforts built on Linux platforms, which can be found at Dronecode.

Onboard cameras are capable of storing video — anywhere from five minutes to two hours of video on a USB stick. Some advanced operating systems allow for real-time upload of video to external storage networks.

Even the cheapest drones have fully operational Wi-Fi, radio frequency and Bluetooth antennas or a combination of all three.

Types of Drones and Movement Capability

Drones come in many types or designs, such as aerial, aquatic, submersible, ground-based, quadrupedal and bipedal walkers, and those that can adhere to walls and ceilings. Several universities in the U.S. are experimenting with insect- and animal-like models, but these are not readily available to consumers — yet.

Drone movement can be preprogrammed or manually controlled by a hand-held device. Manual control requires radio frequency and can operate in several spectra:

Various short-range FM and UHF bands;
Unregulated frequency bands (typically 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz); and
Bluetooth technology frequency bands (very short range).

If a drone requires human control for movement, it is classified as a semiautonomous system. If its route or actions can be preset and do not require human intervention to move, it is considered an autonomous system.

Movement is typically along the x- and y-axes. It can be preprogrammed via code, provided through reference coordinates from a GPS and given by magnetic orientation or from optical queues such as guide markings or lights. Because of these abilities, individuals and organizations must be aware of the threats drones can pose.

Nefarious Drone Uses Within Industrial Areas

Industrial plants should have well-documented plans for avoiding or, at the very least, responding to the following scenarios:

Drones flying directly over nuclear cooling towers, where they can simply be shut off or drop while carrying an explosive payload;
Drones targeting or running reconnaissance on sensitive areas such as power junctions where touching two lines is enough to cause a blackout; and
Drone submarines that can propel themselves into hydroelectric turbines or detonate an explosive next to an aging dam.

New software allows drone operators to incorporate infrared and night vision, which could easily be employed to watch and document security patrols around corporate locations, military installations, national laboratories and federal buildings.

Nefarious Drone Uses Against Corporations

Public and private companies that plan to introduce drones into their environment should have solid response plans for the following:

Drones that are stolen from corporate teams and used to play back video, audio or motion maps;
Drones that are wired with microphones used to either eavesdrop on sensitive conversations, execute electronic harassment or commit industrial espionage;
When data stored on drones can be replayed so that current conditions are not actually displayed (i.e., replay data from two months ago). Granted, this is a sophisticated repurpose but not entirely unfeasible; and
When the drone network or infrastructure is hacked from within the organization or as the program is developed, which usually means complete compromise of all data. This is an entirely new twist on insider threats and will require the same care and thought that goes into any threat program.

Risk Scenarios and Nefarious Uses Against Civilians

The potential to use this cutting-edge technology against civilian populations is staggering. This short section will not do justice to the myriad of ways criminals will repurpose this technology. Here are a few examples that come to mind:

Drones can be shut down midflight, injuring bystanders and causing property damage, or flown into situations like traffic jams, buildings or people.
Drones can be flown into sports venues packed with spectators. This seems like a fairly innocuous scenario until you consider how fast the propeller blades on these drones spin. Removing the plastic guards essentially turns them into flying, radio-controlled razor blades.
Drones can be flown into commercial jets or jet engines while in flight. Interestingly enough, this scenario has played out several times in the past few months at several airports.
Terrorist organizations could easily design and build a drone capable of carrying several pounds of explosives into public areas and government buildings.
Terrorist organizations and extremists could handle, with a high degree of anonymity, explosive or incendiary payloads, radioactive materials, chemical agents or biological agents.
Any individual with a teaspoon of technical know-how could use drones to stalk, harass or eavesdrop on another individual.
Potential Physical Security Measures

Reliance on human observation alone is impractical. As a result, the following security measures are viable:

A defensive perimeter can be established around power generation and distribution facilities. It should be implemented around all critical infrastructure and commercial and private airports. For these situations, a mesh of multiple defensive measures will most likely be required.
Power line protection is logistically unfeasible at this time due to technology limitations, but this should definitely be given further thought.
Acoustic and/or frequency spectrum monitoring equipment and a motion sensing network should be established both inside and outside of sensitive areas. The monitoring networks could be designed to sound an alarm, send a text message to your mobile phone or send an alert to the wearable on your wrist.

In a worst-case scenario, physical security personnel could practice their skeet shooting technique on the rogue drone, purchase a couple of drone-hunting eagles or deploy a kill-switch perimeter.

Practical Legal Measures

Organizations must also take care to approach a drone scenario carefully. There are various legal measures to consider:

Well-defined safety, technical and legal procedures on how to take control of a rogue or hostile drone could be defined in advance.
Handling of any questionable drones should be treated much like any other evidence, with proper chain of custody. Otherwise, any data captured and stored could be compromised by mishandling, thereby diminishing any legal and evidentiary value.
The vulnerabilities of the chipsets, operating systems, configurations and control interfaces should be clearly defined and remediated as appropriate. For those vulnerabilities that cannot be fully remediated, contingent controls should be established.
Vetting of all existing and future drone acquisitions by a company should include a technical vulnerability analysis and penetration testing, just like any other hardware.
A database should be established to document all drones’ history and operational usage. The information required will include, but is not limited to, acquisition (e.g., PO, vendor, manufacturer, date of receipt), physical inventory, picture of device, transmitter and receiver serial numbers, frequencies used, data and radio vulnerability analysis, department assigned and any maintenance performed on the device.

There Is a Positive Side

Drones can be employed for a wide range of beneficial uses. Some examples include monitoring gas leaks along pipelines where it may be too dangerous for a crew, furthering rescue efforts after earthquakes or natural disasters, determining how bad a meltdown at a reactor is, monitoring livestock, mapping terrain, completing storm damage assessments, monitoring the migration habits of endangered species in remote regions and catching poachers on private property.

Complete Lack of Security Framework

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has not yet published a framework for drone hardware, components or source code. Likewise, there is no National Security Agency (NSA) or National Institute of Crime Prevention (NICP) protection profile for drone software outside of those used by the military.

Even scarier is the total lack of any type of standards, governance or open-source security project related to third-party controls and code bases. These standards and security measures will become necessary in the very near future.

Her article was written in 2016. Drones have advanced dramatically since then. Their operating systems and spying capabilities are off the hook. Cell phones now have sonar built in. This gives data to the carrier of a 3d blue print of everything around the cell phone. This technology along with thermal imaging and lasers can allow drones to fly over homes undetected to surveillance more than just your roof. It can see inside anything non metallic and all movement.

What benefit does this have for anyone? Well, for police, they can fly over your house and take inventory of what is inside. If a call comes in about a person who society thinks is a risk, police can find the weapons and know where they are before serving a warrant. Laws haven’t been passed yet about privacy from drone technology. And the size of the drones are extremely small now. According to FAA statistics, there are currently over 850,000 drones registered in the U.S. According to the FBI, there are only about 660,000 police officers.

According to wired magazine, “Early in the pandemic, a city used drones to deliver public safety announcements to homeless encampments, a tactic that critics likened to those used by police states. “This is a public health announcement,” reads a script of the announcement obtained by WIRED, intended to play through the drone’s loudspeaker. “The County Health Officer has issued an order requiring all parks to close, people to stay at least 6 feet away from each other, and your tents to be 12 feet apart.” The script requests “voluntary compliance” and informs people about available services such as Covid-19 education materials and sanitation kits.”

“At the encampment last year, a man who was staying in a tent near Posada’s told WIRED that he had just been released from jail after being hunted by a police drone. Two years ago, he says, he walked into Home Depot and stole an ax that he needed to chop wood. Within minutes, the man noticed the unmistakable buzz of the drone overhead.

He bolted, running through the parking lot before diving into a bush to hide. The drone tracked his every move. It hovered above him, its camera fixed on his hiding spot. Soon enough, a police officer arrived and arrested him. “I was thinking, ‘Oh man, these things can go pretty much anywhere,’” he says. “There’s no way I’m getting away this time.”

Years later, it’s the cold efficiency of technology and the image of the robot tracking him as he fled that sticks out in his mind. Sweeping broken glass away from his tent, he says with a shrug: “It did its job.”

Drones are here to stay, people. I believe these sightings are the elite sending a message to society. This is the new normal. It’s cheaper, faster, more efficient and wastes no time. Using AI to balance, look up information and track people, the future will have a camera on anyone. It’s not enough to have this technology on satellites, which we do have, they want it closer. While UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) weights can vary greatly, even the lightest drones can be dangerous and cause significant harm to people. In addition to causing serious injury, drone collisions in crowded spaces can lead to further damage or disruption, such as distracting vehicle or equipment operators.

15,000 people worldwide get hurt by drones whether from military strikes, accidents or other incidents. It’s a very low number, but as technology gets cheaper, faster and smaller.

Drones can pose a number of dangers, including:

Privacy: Drones with cameras can capture images of private property, and their constant presence in the sky can be an invasion of privacy.
Injury to others: Even the lightest drones can cause serious harm to people, especially in crowded spaces. Drone operators and assistants are at the highest risk of injury because they are close to the drone during take-off, landing, and other flight operations.
Smuggling: Drones can be used to smuggle contraband into high security facilities.
Weather-dependent: Drones are more vulnerable to weather conditions than traditional aircraft, and may not be able to maneuver properly or gather reliable data in unfavorable conditions.
Hearing damage: The sharp edges of drone propellers can cause cuts and hearing damage.
Security and cyber risks: Drones can be vulnerable to theft, vandalism, hacking, jamming, spoofing, or hijacking.
Attacks: Drones can carry explosives or chemical/biological agents, or interfere with military aircraft.

A 14 year old was seriously injured when fishing off a pier in Florida when the propeller of his drone swung around and cut his arm. He was ok but lost feeling in his wrist. This is just one of hundreds of stories of people playing around with drones and getting injured. I do not believe the drones people are seeing are from aliens or another dimension. The images we see on social media of blobs and undefined things are just that. Blobs and undefined hoaxes from people using AI video generators.

So, in conclusion, I believe the drones are just a distraction for something. It could be to focus the left and their anger of Trump winning on a new threat until Trump gets into office. It could be the military just playing around and doing tests on mass hysteria. It could be amazon testing their new drones. It could be a way to provoke a war with Russia and China as we look weak right now. It could be a way to get us to accept drones in the public. It could be corporations spying on Americans or our own military. Whatever it is, it’s nothing to fear. We have gone over the cliff of privacy and lost it all. The Patriot Act doesn’t defend us and nor does any law right about drones or satellites. Anyone with money can get any intel they want on anyone. Sure, we can pass laws, but when has that ever stopped criminals? I have proved there are around 13 families that control most of the world and are playing a game of armageddon for sport. My hopes is society will get into gear and create personal EMP weapons so we can shoot them down ourselves. The army already has EMP rifle attachments that can shoot down small drones. Sooner or later it will hit the open market. Youtube has dozens of videos on how to build one. This one dude built one two years ago. I Built A Military EMP Gun! (New Method).

source