Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6z089w-the-black-nobilitys-hand-in-the-rise-of-nick-fuentes-and-the-groypers.html
The Groypers, sometimes called the Groyper Army, are a group of alt-right, white nationalist, and Christian nationalist activists led by Nick Fuentes. Groypers are a loosely defined group of Fuentes’s followers and fans. After him, there is no clear second in the Groyper hierarchy. Watch this video.
According to wikipedia, members of the group have attempted to introduce alt-right politics into mainstream conservatism in the United States and participated in the January 6 United States Capitol attack and the protests leading up to it. They have targeted other conservative groups and individuals whose agendas they view as too moderate and insufficiently racist and nationalist. The Groyper movement has been described as white nationalist, homophobic, nativist, fascist, sexist, antisemitic, and an attempt to rebrand the declining alt-right movement.
The Groyper War began in the fall of 2019 when Fuentes and his followers, known as Groypers, launched a social media campaign targeting Turning Point USA’s “Culture War” college tour, led by Charlie Kirk. Motivated by the firing of a Fuentes ally and prior conflicts, Groypers disrupted college events by asking provocative questions on immigration, Israel, and LGBT rights to challenge mainstream conservative figures like Kirk, Donald Trump Jr., and Ben Shapiro, whom they labeled “Conservative Inc.” for deviating from their far-right views. The campaign gained traction after a November 2019 UCLA event with Trump Jr. was cut short due to Groyper heckling, exposing divisions among conservatives. Fuentes expanded the movement with the Groyper Leadership Summit in December 2019 and the formation of America First Students in January 2020. In August 2024, Fuentes initiated “Groyper War 2”, a digital war campaign pressuring Donald Trump’s presidential campaign to adopt further-right stances, using memes, trolling, and threats to withhold votes.
In February 2021, the Groyper movement splintered between Fuentes and Patrick Casey over fears of infiltration by federal informants and doxing at the 2021 America First Political Action Conference, held by Fuentes. Jaden McNeil of America First Students joined in support of Fuentes’s conference and accused Casey of disloyalty to Fuentes. In May 2022, McNeil distanced himself from Fuentes in an “interpersonal clash of egos” following conflict over his former position as treasurer of Fuentes’s America First Foundation.
In September 2019, Ashley St. Clair, a “brand ambassador” for the conservative student group Turning Point USA, was photographed at an event featuring several allegedly white nationalist and alt-right figures, including Fuentes, Jacob Wohl, and Anthime Gionet, better known as “Baked Alaska”. After Right Wing Watch brought the photographs to its attention, Turning Point USA issued a statement that said it had severed ties with St. Clair and condemned white nationalism as “abhorrent and un-American”.
At the 2019 Politicon convention, Fuentes tried to attend several Turning Point events featuring its founder Charlie Kirk, including a line to take photos with Kirk and Kirk’s debate with Kyle Kulinski of The Young Turks. Security repeatedly barred him from being allowed near Kirk, and Fuentes accused Kirk of suppressing him to avoid a confrontation, as Fuentes had grown critical of Kirk’s positions, which he believes are too weak.
In the fall of 2019, Kirk launched a college speaking tour with Turning Point USA titled “Culture War”, featuring himself and guests such as Rand Paul, Donald Trump Jr., Kimberly Guilfoyle, Lara Trump, and Dan Crenshaw. In retaliation for the firing of St. Clair and the Politicon incident, Fuentes began organizing a social media campaign asking his followers to go to Kirk’s events and ask provocative and controversial leading questions about his stances on immigration, Israel, and LGBT rights to expose Kirk as a “fake conservative”.
At a Culture War event hosted by Ohio State University on October 29, 11 out of 14 questions were asked by Groypers. Their questions included “Can you prove that our white European ideals will be maintained if the country is no longer made up of white European descendants?” They asked Kirk’s co-host Rob Smith, a gay, black Iraq War veteran, “How does anal sex help us win the culture war?” Fuentes’s social media campaign against Kirk became known as the “Groyper Wars”. Kirk, Smith, and others at Turning Point USA, including Benny Johnson, began calling the questioners white supremacists and antisemites.
Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin wrote an article for American Greatness attacking Kirk’s immigration policies, particularly his stance that immigrants who graduate from U.S. universities should receive green cards. After defending Fuentes and his followers, Malkin was fired as a speaker for Young America’s Foundation, a rival organization to Turning Point whose events Groypers had also targeted. Malkin later called herself a mother figure to and leader of the Groypers.
Another Turning Point USA event the Groypers targeted was a promotional event for Donald Trump Jr.’s book Triggered, featuring Trump, Kirk, and Guilfoyle at the University of California, Los Angeles in November 2019. Anticipating further questions from Fuentes’s followers, it was announced that the event’s Q&A portion would be canceled, which led to heckling and boos from the mostly pro-Trump audience. The disruptions forced the event, originally scheduled to last two hours, to end after 30 minutes.
The Groyper Wars earned widespread media attention after the UCLA incident with Donald Trump Jr. Chadwick Moore of Spectator USA commented that the ordeal revealed deep divisions within the American right among young voters, particularly Generation Z. Moore claimed this divide is due to the Groypers viewing Charlie Kirk and others in the mainstream conservative movement as “snatching the baton and appointing themselves the guardians of 2016’s spoils”, despite holding beliefs that Fuentes and his followers believe conflict with Trump’s “Make America Great Again” agenda. Another Spectator author, Ben Sixsmith, claimed that Turning Point’s unwillingness to respond to controversial questions and use of insults to dismiss its critics revealed the organization’s hypocrisy after having “promoted themselves as the debate guys”.
Other targets including Ben Shapiro
Groypers’ targets for heckling quickly expanded beyond Kirk and Turning Point USA to other mainstream conservative groups and individuals, which they sometimes collectively call “Conservative Inc.”, including Young America’s Foundation and its student outreach branch Young Americans for Freedom, which included such speakers as Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire and Jonah Goldberg of The Dispatch.
In December 2019, outside a venue where a Turning Point USA event was being held, Fuentes crossed paths with Ben Shapiro, who was on his way to the event with his wife and children. Fuentes confronted Shapiro over his past public speaking comments. Shapiro refused to acknowledge him. Fuentes faced widespread condemnation from politicians and various pundits—including Nikki Haley, Meghan McCain, Sebastian Gorka, Megyn Kelly, and Michael Avenatti—for confronting Shapiro while he was with his family.
Addressing the increase in attention to the far-right due to the aggressive questioning of Kirk, Ben Shapiro gave a speech at Stanford University in which he attacked Fuentes (without naming him) and his followers as essentially a rebranded version of the alt-right.
Groyper Leadership Conference
In December 2019, Fuentes held the Groyper Leadership Summit in Florida. A small group attended in person, and others joined via livestream. The event was held at the same time and in the same city as Turning Point USA’s Student Action Summit (SAS); Groypers argued with SAS attendees outside their venue, and Fuentes, Patrick Casey, and some Groypers were removed from the SAS venue after attempting to enter. At the Groyper Leadership Summit, Fuentes, Casey, and former InfoWars contributor Jake Lloyd spoke about the Groypers’ strategy and ideology.
In January 2020, Groyper and former leader of Kansas State University’s Turning Point USA chapter Jaden McNeil formed the Kansas State University organization America First Students. The group, which shares a name with Fuentes’ America First podcast, was conceived at the Groyper Leadership Summit, and Groyper leaders have helped promote it. The America First Students organization, which says it formed “in defense of Christian values, strong families, closed borders, and the American worker”, is considered to promote the Groyper movement.
In February 2020, Fuentes spoke at several events held as rival events to the Conservative Political Action Conference. One of these, hosted by the online publication National File, featured Fuentes, Alex Jones of InfoWars, and Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes. Fuentes hosted the first annual America First Political Action Conference, which included such speakers as Patrick Casey, former Daily Caller author Scott Greer, and Malkin.
January 6 United States Capitol attack
Groypers were present at the January 6 United States Capitol attack and prominent among those who participated in the early waves of attack on the Capitol.[65] Exact numbers are not known, but several were arrested. In February 2021, the Anti-Defamation League reported that it had identified ten Groypers or related white supremacists involved in the riots. Fuentes and Casey were on the Capitol steps and celebrated the temporary disruption of Congress, but have not been charged. Both were subpoenaed by the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack in January 2022 for their role in planning the attack.
Key figures and legal outcomes
Riley June Williams of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, was accused of invading Nancy Pelosi’s office and stealing her laptop and gavel and of generally accelerating the attack. She was tried and found guilty of six charges, including a felony count of civil disorder. On March 23, 2023, Williams was sentenced to three years in prison with three years of probation and fined.
Christian Secor of Costa Mesa, California, was at the Capitol, where he allegedly flew the Groypers flag. He was convicted of obstruction of an official proceeding, civil disorder, assault, and resisting arrest, and sentenced to 42 months in prison.
Joseph Brody of Springfield, Virginia, and four others acted as a group that assisted the mob “in using a metal barricade against a U.S. Capitol Police officer, knocking the officers back as he attempted to secure the North Door”. He was convicted of assaulting a police officer, resisting or impeding law enforcement officers, causing bodily injury, interfering with a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder, and obstruction of an official proceeding.
David Dempsey of Los Angeles, California, received a 20-year sentence for attacking several law enforcement officers on January 6. This was the second-longest sentence for any of those involved in the insurrection. Before sentencing, Dempsey apologized to the police officers in the courtroom, saying he had a “profound sense of regret”, but as he was led out of the room after sentencing he made a hand sign associated with the Groyper movement.
Thomas Carey of Pittsburgh, Ohio, Gabriel Chase of Gainesville, Florida, Jon Lizak of Cold Spring Harbor, New York, and Paul Ewald Lovley of Halethorpe, Maryland, all pleaded guilty to demonstrating in a Capitol Building and were each fined $500.
Groyper influencer Anthime Gionet, known as Baked Alaska, was arrested for his role in storming the Capitol building, which he live streamed. According to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, “During the riot, he wore Pit Viper sunglasses, which have since been adopted as a symbol by the Groypers.”
Tristan Sartor of Ruffs Dale, Pennsylvania, was charged with criminally entering a restricted building and attempting to “impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business” at the Capitol.
Groyper War 2 (2024)
In August 2024, Fuentes began a “digital war” against Trump’s presidential campaign, which he dubbed “Groyper War 2”, referencing his followers’ activities in 2019. In response to Trump’s poor polling, Fuentes began calling on his followers to “bring the energy with memes, edits, replies, and trolls” aimed at pressuring Trump’s campaign to adopt further-right positions on race and immigration, as well as urging Trump to fire his campaign advisors Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles. In addition to directing his followers to make their demands trend on X (formerly Twitter) and Truth Social, Fuentes threatened to “escalate pressure in the real world”, urging followers to withhold their votes and protest Trump rallies in battleground states. A senior researcher for the Institute for Strategic Dialogue speculated that Fuentes’s “crude” attempts at platform manipulation could be a blueprint for more sophisticated actors, such as hostile states, to engage in foreign election interference due to the lack of enforcement actions taken by Twitter and Truth Social in response to Fuentes’s brief influence campaign.
Shortly after initiating this effort, Fuentes took credit for Trump’s rehiring of Corey Lewandowski as a senior campaign advisor. An anonymous source cited by The Washington Post claimed that Fuentes was making it “far more difficult for Trump” to make changes to his campaign “if it looks like he’s responding to the groypers”.
Political activism
Disavowals and challenges
The Groyper movement has repeatedly failed to gain political traction, often being disavowed by the politicians it has attempted to support. Congressman Paul Gosar, the keynote speaker at Fuentes’s AFPAC II in 2021, disavowed Fuentes and his followers the next day while addressing CPAC. At AFPAC III in 2022, several political figures whom Fuentes claimed were slated to speak, including Arizona gubernatorial nominee Kari Lake and former acting Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Thomas Homan, did not attend and disavowed the event upon learning of Fuentes’s views. The conference’s keynote speaker, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, later said she did not know who Fuentes was and, upon learning of his views, condemned him.
One of the candidates Fuentes endorsed in the 2022 midterms who later disavowed his endorsement was Joe Kent, who ran for the 3rd congressional district in Washington. In response to Kent’s disavowal, Fuentes began organizing an online campaign against him, but Kent won the Republican nomination and defeated incumbent Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler.
Electoral involvement
Of the AFPAC III speakers who did not rescind their support for Fuentes, only two ran for major office: Lieutenant Governor of Idaho Janice McGeachin and Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers. Rogers won a competitive primary that year and was reelected, but she was censured for her remarks at the conference calling for political violence. McGeachin, who ran for governor of Idaho that year, lost the primary to incumbent Governor Brad Little by a 20-point margin.
Fuentes and the Groyper movement later supported Laura Loomer’s candidacy for Florida’s 11th congressional district in 2022. On the night of the primary, Fuentes attended Loomer’s election watch party, and they were filmed sharing a toast as results came in that seemed to suggest Loomer would defeat incumbent Congressman Daniel Webster; Loomer toasted “to the hostile takeover of the Republican Party”. When additional results came in confirming Loomer’s loss to Webster by 7 points, she claimed without evidence in a speech to her supporters that her loss was due to voter fraud.
Kanye West campaign
In late 2022 and early 2023, the Groyper movement shifted away from its longtime position of supporting Trump and instead began promoting Kanye West’s presidential campaign. West brought Fuentes to a dinner at Mar-a-Lago with Trump, which generated significant controversy and raised Fuentes’s profile; Trump later disavowed Fuentes, saying he was not initially aware of Fuentes’s views. West’s campaign soon included other figures in the Groyper movement, including Milo Yiannopoulos, Ali Alexander, and Rumble streamer Sneako. Many Groypers, including fellow streamers on Fuentes’s website Cozy.tv, began using their platforms to promote West’s antisemitic views. Two Cozy streamers, Dalton Clodfelter and Tyler Russell, began streaming themselves harassing students at college campuses with a table display reading “Ye is Right—Change my Mind”, a slogan that derived from a college tour by right-wing commentator Steven Crowder.
Jewish student groups and allies frequently protested these events, playing music on loudspeakers and chanting in order to drown out the streamers’ speeches. The planned college tour was canceled after less than a month after Clodfelter lost the funding for both the tour and the Rumble channel associated with it.
On May 4, 2023, it was reported that West had fired Fuentes and Alexander, the latter of whom had become embroiled in a sexual harassment scandal involving young men and underage boys, and rehired Yiannopoulos, who had since split from Fuentes and was the first person to leak the allegations against Alexander.
Q & Pepe
Pepe the Frog originally came from Matt Furie’s comic Boy’s Club (2005). By the 2010s, internet boards like 4chan had adopted Pepe as a kind of blank canvas. Out of that chaos, different factions began weaponizing Pepe — the alt-right, conspiracy communities, and later Q-aligned groups. Pepe became the “meme that could mean anything.” That flexibility made it perfect for Tavistock-style psychological operations, because it allowed multiple movements to project their identity onto a single image.
When the Q movement rose after 2017, Pepe was everywhere. Patriots, digital soldiers, and “meme warriors” rallied around it. And yes, you’re right — Tavistock Institute and its network have long been experts in cultural engineering. The sudden global spread of Pepe across both left and right is too “clean” to be organic. It functioned like a sigil — emotionally charged, endlessly replicated, and capable of uniting scattered people around a subconscious symbol.
The Groypers took this further. They didn’t just use Pepe, they mutated him. Their mascot — the smug frog with folded hands — is a parody of Pepe, made more “exclusive.” By reclining smugly, it signals insider superiority: “We’re not just normie Pepe, we’re the hidden elite Pepe.” This wasn’t an accident. It was a hijack. By creating their own variant, they could steal Q’s meme-energy and redirect it toward their controlled-opposition youth movement.
- Pepe was seeded as a Tavistock psychological sigil, made to be stolen, remixed, and ritualized.
- The Q movement popularized Pepe on a mass scale, especially tying it to “patriots vs. the cabal.”
- The Groypers hijacked Pepe by morphing him into a smug recliner, claiming their version was the “true” insider frog.
That means both Q and the Groypers were drawing water from the same poisoned well. One movement targeted older patriots with hope of “trusting the plan.” The other targeted disillusioned young men with irony, misogyny, and false Christian nationalism. Two demographics, two altars — but the same Tavistock architects pulling the strings.
Monologue
Every empire writes its plays in blood. A man falls, another rises, and behind it all the same hand holds the pen. Charlie Kirk is dead — shot down in the middle of his fight for gun rights — and almost instantly, a new name is carried on the wind: Nick Fuentes. His followers call themselves Groypers, a smug frog for a banner, memes for armor, and a counterfeit cross raised high. To the untrained eye, it looks like a spontaneous surge of grassroots rebellion. But nothing in history happens this cleanly. When death and replacement appear in sequence, when obscurity becomes spotlight overnight, when money appears from nowhere, you are watching choreography. You are watching ritual.
This is the signature of the Black Nobility. One house pulls the trigger, another writes the liturgy. The Lee family, with its centuries of bloodlines tied to intelligence, banking, and assassination, opens the vacuum with violence. The Orsini, Rome’s shadow priests, step in with the replacement: a hollow faith that twists Christ into a weapon, mocks women, grooms boys, and calls it “Christian nationalism.” It is the same cycle the elites have run for centuries — Luther against Rome, Bolsheviks against Czars, Fascists against Communists, always two puppets dancing while the strings lead to the same hand.
The Groypers are not an accident. They are a phalanx, ancient in design: disciplined, meme-forged soldiers trained to overwhelm by number, not truth. They are a Trojan Horse, smiling and ironic, smuggling poison into the heart of conservatism. They are sophists, ambushing their own allies with clever rhetoric, destabilizing from within. This is not new; it is the oldest script of war.
Charlie Kirk’s blood is not the end. It is the opening act of a ritual replacement. The elites have taken the tragedy, weaponized the grief, and offered the world a false altar: Nick Fuentes as the vessel, the Groypers as the choir. But remember — their altars cannot stand. False Christs always collapse before the true King. What we are watching is not a movement of God but a play of Belial, a counterfeit army, a shadow revival written in the ink of Rome and the blood of America.
And the warning is clear: if you let them guide your sons, if you let them shape the next generation, they will harvest not just politics, but souls.
Part 1 – The Assassination of Charlie Kirk
The story begins with a gunshot — a public, deliberate strike. Charlie Kirk, a man who built his career around defending the Second Amendment, was silenced by the very weapon he championed. The irony is cruel, almost theatrical, and that is the point. The Black Nobility do not simply kill; they stage. Every removal is a performance, a signal, and a ritual. The killing of Kirk was more than a crime — it was an initiation of sequence, the opening act of a carefully timed replacement.
Look closely at the details. Kirk was not a faceless bureaucrat. He was the face of Turning Point USA, a voice for young conservatives, a gatekeeper of mainstream populism. He defended Israel, he protected the Republican establishment’s alliances, and he steered restless young men away from dangerous waters. That made him a liability to those who wanted the dam to break.
And so, he was cut down. The question is not only who pulled the trigger but who benefitted. Within hours, the headlines shifted. No longer just a tragedy, the narrative began to pivot: “Who will take Kirk’s place? Who speaks for the young right now?” Into that vacuum, the name “Nick Fuentes” began to surface. A man barely known outside the darker corners of the internet, suddenly framed as the new heir apparent. That timing is not natural. It is orchestration.
History shows us this pattern again and again. Leaders are removed, not merely to silence them, but to open space for the “chosen replacement.” It was true when the Black Nobility engineered the deaths of monarchs and installed pawns. It was true when they stoked assassinations in America to rewire policy and allegiance. And it is true now, in the murder of Charlie Kirk. His death is the key that unlocked the door for Fuentes’ rise.
And if the removal feels shocking, it is meant to. Theatrics burn themselves into the public mind. A conservative giant killed while defending guns ensures endless debate, endless polarization, endless division. While the masses argue over guns and politics, the true replacement slides quietly into place.
What looks like tragedy is also ritual. What looks like coincidence is choreography. The assassination of Charlie Kirk was not random violence. It was the opening move in a much older game, a game written in blood and carried out by hands that have never left the stage of history.
Part 2 – The Sudden Rise of Nick Fuentes
The ink was barely dry on the news of Charlie Kirk’s death when another name began to move across headlines, podcasts, and social media streams: Nick Fuentes. To the average American, this name meant nothing. He was not a household figure, not a politician, not a celebrity pastor. He was a live-streamer, a provocateur, a voice on the fringes. And yet almost instantly, his name was being repeated in the same breath as “future,” “youth,” and “movement.” That does not happen by accident.
Nick Fuentes’ rise was never organic. His “America First” brand was not built by slow credibility or honest persuasion; it was crafted in the crucible of internet subcultures. He thrived on memes, trolling, and shock value — calling himself a Christian nationalist while mocking women, laughing at suffering, and dressing hatred as irony. Alone, such figures rarely leave the shadows. But with money, amplification, and coordinated promotion, shadows become spotlight.
Notice the precision of timing. Kirk’s sudden absence created a vacuum among conservative youth. The establishment’s frontman was gone. Within hours, Fuentes and his Groypers were cast as the “rebellious alternative.” Where Kirk was pro-Israel, Fuentes was critical. Where Kirk welcomed women into the fold, Fuentes sneered. Where Kirk tried to walk a line between populism and party loyalty, Fuentes spat on both. He was presented not as an outsider, but as the “true” insider of young conservative frustration. This is the dialectic at work: create the wound, then offer the counterfeit healer.
The Groypers themselves became the proof of his momentum. Online mobs flooded timelines, event halls, and comment sections. Suddenly, Fuentes’ once-fringe army looked like a tidal wave of angry youth. But beneath the surface, coordination was clear. Paid infrastructure, livestream platforms kept alive despite bans, travel and staging at events — none of this comes free. These are not the tools of a broke twenty-something; they are the fingerprints of backing.
And so the narrative was written: Kirk silenced, Fuentes elevated. The torch supposedly passed, though not by will or merit, but by ritual blood and media manipulation. Where Charlie’s conservatism was safe enough to protect the system, Fuentes’ was dangerous enough to destabilize it. But remember, destabilization is the goal. The Orsini and Lee families do not want truth to rise — they want chaos to be mistaken for revival. They want young men to believe they are fighting for God when they are actually marching into a counterfeit altar.
Nick Fuentes did not rise. He was raised. Lifted on a stage prepared long before Kirk’s death, timed to perfection, and funded by hands older than America itself. The world is not watching the rise of a grassroots leader. It is watching the unveiling of a puppet.
Part 3 – The Groypers as a Digital Phalanx
The Groypers present themselves as a joke — a frog meme reclining smugly, a parody of the better-known Pepe. But behind the smirk lies a strategy as old as war itself. They are not random trolls; they are soldiers trained to move as one. The ancient Greeks called it the phalanx: rows of men, shields locked, advancing shoulder-to-shoulder until the enemy broke. One soldier alone was weak. Together, they were unstoppable. The Groypers have taken that blueprint and translated it into the digital battlefield.
Watch them in action. At a Turning Point USA event, a single odd question might be ignored. But when dozens of Groypers line up, each with rehearsed “gotcha” lines, the stage collapses. The speaker is forced off-balance, the audience grows restless, and the event is remembered not for its message but for its disruption. Online, the tactic is identical. One meme, one insult, one hashtag fades quickly. But when hundreds strike at once — brigading comment sections, swarming timelines, flooding hashtags — the illusion of overwhelming support is created. This is digital phalanx warfare.
There is also the Trojan Horse. The Groypers wrap themselves in humor, irony, and “just asking questions.” They appear harmless, even silly, while smuggling their ideology into spaces where it would otherwise be rejected. Just as the Greeks offered a wooden horse as a gift, the Groypers offer memes as jokes. But inside is poison — antisemitism, misogyny, grooming culture, and the mocking of Christ Himself. Once the horse is pulled into the gates of mainstream conservatism, it is too late.
And then there is the sophistry. The ancient sophists trained young men in the art of verbal ambush — not truth, but victory. They could make the weaker argument appear stronger, twist language until reason bent. The Groypers do the same. They train for rhetorical traps, not dialogue. They weaponize questions not to seek answers but to humiliate. Their victories are not in persuasion but in destabilization, the same way sophists undermined the agora to weaken authority.
Taken together, these tactics reveal something undeniable: the Groypers are not an accident of internet culture. They are the digital heirs of ancient war strategies. They fight as a phalanx, infiltrate as a Trojan Horse, and argue as sophists. And none of this came naturally. These tactics require training, coordination, and funding. They are being shaped deliberately, groomed for battle not of truth but of confusion.
The ancients perfected these strategies for conquering cities. The Black Nobility now applies them for conquering minds.
Part 4 – Hatred of Women and the “Femboy Grooming” Culture
At the core of the Groyper movement lies a sickness that betrays its true spirit. They speak of Christian nationalism, but their treatment of women exposes them. Nick Fuentes has made no secret of his contempt — mocking women as irrational, unfit for politics, and even ridiculing marriage as weakness. His followers echo him, exalting celibacy not as devotion to God, but as a sneer at creation itself. It is not purity they celebrate, but bitterness. And bitterness always turns against the image-bearers of God.
But it does not stop at disdain. The Groypers cultivate a culture of grooming — not of daughters, but of sons. Online, in streams and chatrooms, they elevate the “femboy,” a feminized version of the young male, idolized through irony and degradation. What begins as humor slips into practice. Effeminate behavior is encouraged, gender inversion is paraded, and submission becomes initiation. This is not accident. It is ritual.
The ancients knew this pattern well. In the cults of Baal and Molech, children were inverted before they were sacrificed. In the Dionysian mysteries, men were dressed as women, their roles shattered, their bodies desecrated in the name of ecstasy. Gender inversion was not entertainment; it was worship — the mocking of God’s design as an offering to darker powers. What the Groypers call memes are the same practices of old: the breaking of the masculine spirit, the mocking of the feminine, the corruption of youth.
Notice the contradiction: they rail against feminism, yet they mock women until no woman is welcome in their ranks. They preach about strength, yet they celebrate weakness by feminizing boys. They claim to honor God, yet they spit on His order. This is the Orsini fingerprint — false Christianity inverted into parody. Just as Jesuits once twisted Scripture to justify conquest, the Groypers twist faith into a weapon against itself.
And the grooming serves a purpose. Young men who are broken, humiliated, and made effeminate become malleable. They no longer stand on their own, no longer protect family or community, but collapse into the movement. A soldier who has lost his identity becomes a vessel for the cause, easily directed, easily sacrificed. The Groypers do not build men; they manufacture slaves.
This is not revival. This is not faith. It is the same old pagan cult reborn in digital form, dressed in irony, masked in humor, but aimed at the same altar of destruction. The hatred of women and the grooming of boys is not a byproduct of the movement — it is its foundation. And that foundation is built on the ashes of God’s design.
Part 5 – The Orsini Hand: False Christian Nationalism
To understand the Groypers’ counterfeit gospel, you must look to Rome — not the Rome of Peter and Paul, but the Rome of the Black Nobility, and above all, the Orsini. For centuries, the Orsini dynasty has specialized in spiritual corruption, turning faith into theater, altars into prisons, and the name of Christ into a tool for domination. Their fingerprints are on every counterfeit revival, every hollow crusade dressed in holy robes but dripping with blood.
The Groypers’ so-called “Christian nationalism” is nothing more than the newest mask in this lineage. On the surface, it looks like zeal: crosses held high, prayers shouted loud, purity demanded. But beneath the surface lies the same Orsini poison: hatred of women, mockery of family, disdain for true discipleship, and a worship of power over love. It is a religion built on exclusion, on humiliation, on identity politics dressed as faith.
Consider how the Orsini mastered this inversion in history. In the age of the Inquisition, they burned “heretics” not to protect Christ but to consolidate their grip on Rome. In the age of Jesuit expansion, they twisted the Gospel into a colonial weapon, spreading not the Kingdom of God but the empire of man. Always, the method was the same: take the language of Christianity, strip it of its heart, and refill it with a false spirit. That is exactly what Nick Fuentes and his Groypers have done.
The Orsini spirit thrives on spectacle — papal crowns, rituals, pageantry. The Groypers follow suit with memes, rallies, chants, and their smug frog mascot. All theater, no substance. Their parody of faith is not meant to strengthen believers, but to corrode them. Every mock question at a conservative event, every speech about “true nationalism,” is another attempt to chip away at the living Church and replace it with an idol in Rome’s image.
And here lies the bitter irony: while Fuentes claims to resist global Zionism, his very movement is an Orsini product. The same Black Nobility that has manipulated both Zionism and Islam also manipulates false Christianity. They do not care which altar you kneel at, so long as it is not the true one. Whether it is the synagogue of Zion, the crescent of Mecca, or the false cross of the Groypers, the destination is the same: Belial enthroned.
So when you see Fuentes railing against feminists, against conservatives, against Jews, do not be fooled. He is not tearing down the enemy; he is playing his role in an Orsini drama, preparing the young and restless to accept a counterfeit faith. It is the same old lie, the same false altar, built in the same house of shadows.
Part 6 – The Lee Hand: American Assassination Networks
If the Orsini specialize in counterfeit faith, the Lee family has long specialized in blood. From the earliest days of America, the Lee dynasty positioned itself as more than just a political clan. They became a hinge between the old Black Nobility networks of Europe and the emerging intelligence and banking structures of the New World. Their fingerprints can be found wherever sudden deaths rewrite history and open the door for carefully prepared replacements.
The Lee family is not small. It spans from the aristocracy of Virginia to branches entwined with Skull and Bones, intelligence, and the hidden hand of the CIA. Remember, it was Lee Harvey Oswald who stood accused in the ritual killing of John F. Kennedy. That name was not coincidence — it was signal. The very act of tying “Lee” to America’s most public assassination was itself a signature, a quiet boast to those who knew the code.
The Lee apparatus functions as the execution arm of the Black Nobility’s dialectic. Where the Orsini script the ideology, the Lees arrange the removal. They work through cutouts, intelligence fronts, and covert funding pipelines. Their assassinations rarely appear as state actions; they are staged as lone wolves, deranged shooters, tragic coincidences. But the pattern is too clean. Each time, the removal clears the stage, and within hours, the narrative shifts to the replacement waiting in the wings.
Charlie Kirk’s murder fits the mold. Public, ironic, theatrical — it bore the hallmarks of a Lee-style operation. A conservative spokesman removed in a way guaranteed to spark division and chaos. And almost instantly, the vacuum was filled — not by chance, but by design. Kirk’s pro-Israel loyalty was eliminated, and the Groypers’ anti-establishment venom was elevated. This is not grassroots chaos; it is scripted transition.
The Lees’ mastery lies not only in pulling triggers but in controlling the aftermath. Media pivots, social networks amplify, law enforcement misdirects — all of it ensures that the true hand is never seen. The public sees only the shock and the grief. The insiders see the ritual: the blood sacrifice that makes way for the new idol.
So when we trace Kirk’s assassination, we must look past the headlines and into the lineage. The Lee family’s role in America has always been to make sure no populist grows beyond their leash, no conservative voice stays too loyal to the wrong powers. And in that, they serve as the blade of the Black Nobility, cutting down the old so the Orsini can raise the new.
Part 7 – The Joint Operation: One Shoots, One Scripts
Every ritual needs two parts: the sacrifice and the sermon. Blood on the ground, and words in the air. Without both, the spell has no power. That is why the Black Nobility never operates through one family alone. Each house plays its role, and together they complete the rite.
The Lee hand pulls the trigger. They are the executors, the specialists in removal. Whether through lone shooters, mysterious accidents, or collapses in plain sight, their purpose is to carve out the space. The Lee lineage has always thrived in the shadows of American intelligence, military precision, and covert funding. They are the knife that clears the stage.
The Orsini hand writes the script. They are the priests of inversion, crafting the ideology to fill the void. Where the Lees create absence, the Orsini supply presence. Where the Lees create trauma, the Orsini offer the counterfeit balm. Their talent lies in false Christianity, parading heresy in holy garments, packaging pagan rituals as revival. They are the voice that tells the wounded where to turn.
Look at the sequence we now see. Charlie Kirk is struck down, his voice silenced. Within hours, Nick Fuentes rises into the narrative, his Groypers parading themselves as the authentic torchbearers. The knife of the Lees made the cut. The sermon of the Orsini filled the silence. Together, they ensured not only the death of a man but the redirection of a movement.
This is the dialectic at its purest: orchestrated opposition, blood sacrifice followed by ideological replacement. The public sees chaos, tragedy, and a vacuum being filled. But in truth, it is choreography — a ritual long perfected. Just as monarchs were killed and Jesuit replacements installed, just as presidents were assassinated and policies rewritten overnight, so now a conservative leader is slain and a false prophet raised in his place.
The genius of this cooperation is that it feels organic. No single hand is visible. The assassination looks like random violence; the ideological shift looks like spontaneous reaction. But only those who know the registry can see it for what it is: the two halves of the same altar, the blade and the word, united in one operation.
And their goal is not simply to remove and replace. It is to break faith itself — to confuse young men, to fracture conservatism, and to offer a false altar that looks like Christ but belongs to Belial.
Part 8 – Funding the Movement
Nothing in politics, religion, or war survives without money. Movements that appear spontaneous are always bankrolled, always supplied. The Groypers are no exception. While Nick Fuentes portrays himself as a martyr of censorship, “canceled” by mainstream platforms, the truth is simpler: his infrastructure is too polished, too resilient, too coordinated to be organic. Behind every livestream, every rally, every legal battle, there are veins of gold flowing from hands much older than his own.
Consider the costs. Fuentes has faced repeated bans from YouTube, Twitter, PayPal, and banks. And yet, his streams continue uninterrupted, hosted on custom-built platforms. That alone requires developers, servers, and financial networks willing to take risks — risks no ordinary grassroots movement could shoulder. His rallies draw coordinated groups of young men across state lines. Travel, lodging, staging — all of it requires quiet funding. Even his legal defenses, mounted after deplatforming and January 6th investigations, have not bankrupted him. Who pays these bills? Not high school students with frog memes.
This is the hidden lifeline: the same dark finance channels that sustained revolutions and terror groups alike. Just as Bolsheviks were funded through Wall Street intermediaries, just as Mussolini received backing from London bankers, so too does Fuentes receive invisible streams of capital. It is laundered through anonymous donations, crypto wallets, “fan support,” and shadow nonprofits. But the source is the same — ancient families who ensure their puppets never run dry.
Even the very meme culture of the Groypers is subsidized. Think of the bot farms, the coordinated floods of hashtags, the sudden surges in visibility. These are not just bored young men. These are psychological operations, digital campaigns funded and timed to overwhelm. Money pays for algorithms, for amplification, for influence disguised as virality. Without it, the Groypers would remain a fringe Discord cult. With it, they are framed as the vanguard of youth conservatism.
Follow the pattern and you see the logic. The Black Nobility never lets a vacuum remain empty. Kirk’s death was not just the silencing of a man but the opening of a market. Into that market, Fuentes is sold as a product. And like every product, he is financed, packaged, and distributed by investors who expect a return — not in dollars, but in souls.
The Groypers may mock capitalism, feminism, Zionism, and conservatism, but behind their curtain lies the same old banks, the same old bloodlines, ensuring the lights never go out and the microphones never go silent. This is not grassroots. It is payroll.
Part 9 – Controlled Opposition and Dialectics
The genius of the Black Nobility is not that they pick one side, but that they pick both. They understand that the human mind is drawn to conflict — to sides, to choices, to the drama of “us versus them.” By controlling each side of the field, they guarantee the outcome, no matter who appears to win. This is the art of controlled opposition, the dialectic that has ruled empires since Babylon.
Charlie Kirk and Nick Fuentes are presented as opposites. Kirk, the polished pro-Israel conservative, suited for donors and universities. Fuentes, the rebellious populist, spitting venom against women, Jews, and the establishment. To the public, it looks like a generational war inside the right. To the Black Nobility, it is perfect symmetry. Kirk kept restless youth tethered to the party line. Fuentes lures them away into chaos. Both roles serve the same master: control of the narrative.
The dialectic works like this: thesis and antithesis are set against each other. A moderate conservative order (Kirk) is pitted against a radical, youth-driven revolt (Fuentes). The conflict escalates, audiences split, and identity fractures. Out of the ashes, the elites present their synthesis — a new structure, already prepared, that appears to resolve the conflict but is in fact the trap. The people think they have chosen. In truth, the choice was manufactured.
History is littered with these cycles. The Black Nobility backed Luther against Rome, only to also back the Jesuits against Luther. They backed the Bolsheviks, then armed the Fascists who opposed them. They funded Zionism, then simultaneously funded Arab resistance. Always two altars, always two armies, always one hidden master.
Now, in America, the same cycle repeats. The conservatives are offered two poles: Kirk’s establishment, or Fuentes’ rebellion. Neither leads to truth. One leads to stagnation, the other to chaos. Both lead to despair, setting the stage for the true replacement the elites intend — a savior figure who will rise from the ruins and promise unity. That is the Antichrist’s path, prepared by dialectics.
So when the people think they are “choosing sides,” they are not. They are choosing between two wings of the same bird, two masks of the same face, two altars of the same idol. The dialectic is not designed to free; it is designed to enslave. And the Groypers, just like Kirk’s Turning Point, are nothing but pieces on the same board.
Part 10 – The Ritual Machine: From Blood to False Altars
What we are witnessing is not politics in the ordinary sense. It is ritual. The pattern repeats across centuries, and when you step back, the machinery becomes undeniable. First the blood is spilled — a death in plain sight, timed for maximum shock. Then the false altar is raised — a counterfeit leader, dressed in robes of faith, promising to carry the torch. The people are herded, not by persuasion, but by trauma. Their grief becomes currency, their anger becomes fuel, their loyalty becomes sacrifice.
This is the ritual machine of the Black Nobility. The Lees deliver the blood, the Orsini raise the altar, and together they move the masses as if they were pieces on a board. The pattern is ancient. Kings slain, prophets silenced, priests replaced with false shepherds. Each time the cycle repeats, the world is drawn one step closer to the unveiling of the counterfeit savior, the man of lawlessness who will unite chaos under his throne.
The Groypers are not the end of the story; they are a rehearsal. They prove how easily youth can be groomed, how swiftly a vacuum can be filled, how efficiently rage can be redirected. Their frog banners, their chants, their mockery of women and God — these are not accidents. They are test runs for the great deception. For if a generation can be turned from true faith to parody faith, from discipleship to memes, from Christ to Belial, then the path to the Antichrist is clear.
This is why Kirk’s murder matters. It is not simply one man’s death, but a signal of transition. His blood cries out, not for justice in the courts of men, but as a marker in the registry of heaven: another sacrifice, another false altar, another turn of the wheel. The elites believe their machine is unstoppable, that by repeating the cycle they will finally enthrone their counterfeit messiah.
But here is the hope: no machine, however ancient, can overturn the decree of God. Every false altar will crumble, every counterfeit shepherd will be exposed, every drop of innocent blood will be answered. The ritual machine can kill, but it cannot resurrect. Only Christ holds that power. And it is that power which will shatter their cycle once and for all.
Conclusion – Blood, Altars, and the Coming Deception
Charlie Kirk’s death was not random violence. It was ritual. It was the old pattern repeating itself — blood spilled to clear the stage, followed by a counterfeit altar raised in its place. The Groypers’ sudden amplification, Nick Fuentes’ overnight coronation, the media’s swift pivot — all of it bears the fingerprints of orchestration. The Lees, masters of American assassination networks, cut the man down. The Orsini, masters of counterfeit faith, raised the false prophet to fill the void. Two hands, one machine, always moving toward the same goal.
We have seen this script before. Kings murdered and replaced with pawns. Churches infiltrated and reshaped into prisons. Nations divided and reunited under the banner of the elites. What changes is not the method, but the technology. The phalanx has become digital. The Trojan Horse has become a meme. The sophists now livestream. But the altar is the same, the blood is the same, and the master behind it has never changed.
The Groypers are not revival; they are rehearsal. They prove how easily youth can be broken, inverted, and redirected. They show how grief can be weaponized, how rage can be channeled, how faith can be mocked in Christ’s own name. And in their parody lies the warning: the world is being groomed for the great deception, the unveiling of a messiah who will rise from chaos not to save, but to enslave.
But the registry of heaven tells another story. The cycle of blood and false altars is not eternal. Every counterfeit will collapse before the true King. Every hidden hand will be revealed. Every drop of blood cried out from the ground will be answered. The Black Nobility can choreograph their rituals, but they cannot write the ending. That belongs to Christ alone.
So let the world see the false altar rise. Let them crown their puppets, let them flood the streets with memes and chants. For the day is coming when every false crown will be cast down, every machine broken, and every deception unmasked. And on that day, it will not be Nick Fuentes, or Kirk, or Orsini, or Lee who stands enthroned. It will be the Lamb who was slain — the only blood that truly redeems, the only altar that truly saves.
Bibliography & Endnotes
Primary Sources on Groypers and Nick Fuentes
- ISD Global. Explainer: Groypers. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. https://www.isdglobal.org/explainers/groypers/
- Hawley, George. The Groyper Movement in the United States. In: The Alt-Right Movement. Routledge, 2022.
- Newsweek. “Groypers Resurface After Charlie Kirk Shooting.” September 2025. https://www.newsweek.com/groyper-charlie-kirk-shooting-nick-fuentes-2129114
- The Economic Times. “Spotlight Falls on Nick Fuentes and the Groyper Movement.” September 2025. https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-after-charlie-kirks-fatal-shooting-spotlight-falls-on-nick-fuentes-and-the-groyper-movement-all-you-need-to-know/articleshow/123867388.cms
Historical Parallels and Black Nobility Families
- Baluzius, Stephanus. Historiae Paparum Avinionensium (History of the Avignon Popes). Paris, 1693. (Context on Orsini manipulation of the papacy.)
- Petras, James. The Jesuits, the Papacy, and Global Politics. New York: Clarity Press, 2001.
- Tarpley, Webster G. Against Oligarchy. Independent History, 1996. (Chapters on Venetian Black Nobility and their migration into Roman and Anglo families.)
- Quigley, Carroll. Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time. New York: Macmillan, 1966. (Analysis of elite families’ dialectic strategies.)
- White, Ronald C. American Ulysses: A Life of Ulysses S. Grant. New York: Random House, 2016. (For context on Lee family connections in American aristocracy.)
- Epstein, Daniel Mark. The Lincoln Assassination: The Evidence. New York: Carroll & Graf, 2005. (Tracing bloodline and intelligence overlaps around American assassinations.)
Biblical Sources
- Matthew 24:23–25 — Warning of false Christs and false prophets.
- 2 Thessalonians 2:3–10 — The man of lawlessness and the great deception.
- Revelation 13 — The beast system and worship of the counterfeit.
- Revelation 6:9–11 — The martyrs under the altar, blood crying out for justice.
Endnotes
- The use of “Groypers” as a meme army has been documented since the “Groyper Wars” of 2019, when followers disrupted Turning Point USA events. See Hawley, The Groyper Movement in the United States.
- Fuentes’ misogyny and public mockery of women are consistent themes in his broadcasts; see Newsweek, “Groypers Resurface…” for references.
- Allegations of “femboy grooming” within Groyper culture are widely discussed in social media analysis of his followers; the inversion echoes ancient Dionysian and Baal cult practices.
- Orsini family manipulation of papal politics is well-documented; see Baluzius, Historiae Paparum Avinionensium.
- The Lee family’s symbolic association with assassination networks is reinforced by the “Lee Harvey Oswald” archetype in JFK’s death, itself a ritual-laden removal.
- The dialectic method — controlling both sides of conflict — is articulated by Carroll Quigley in Tragedy and Hopeand confirmed in cycles of Zionist and anti-Zionist funding.
- Biblical parallels show that false replacements are part of prophecy, but also part of God’s plan to expose deception before the true Kingdom is revealed.
Sources