Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6s8p23-techgnosis.html
Strange Trump Dream
I had the most strangest dream ever. Apparently, I was a trump fan and was helping his campaign for a church when all of a sudden, it was announced he was shot and killed. I was immediately brought to his funeral and riding in a limo with Melania and what appeared to be her daughter.
I grabbed Melania’s hand and said, “Is this happening? Is this really true? I can’t believe this is real?” And both the daughter and Melania looked disturbed by what I was saying. I responded, “I am sorry, I know this happened and I am sorry for your loss, but I am having trouble accepting this.”
Then we were swept away in the church and everyone was in the service but I was outside of it. I couldn’t walk in for some reason. I just couldn’t believe it was true. I was actually sobbing and walked outside. Which is bizarre because I am not a Trump supporter.
I walked towards the limo that we arrived in and out of the corner of my eye, I saw Trump’s face inside. I did a double take and walked up to the window and peered in. I couldn’t see anything as the glass was very dark. Then I saw him. The doors opened immediately and the driver took off with me inside.
They briefed me that Trump staged his own murder and the bad guys now were cornered. A general in the limo asked me if I wanted to do the honors. What is he talking about? Then he showed me a button on his phone and said, “Press this and they are history.” I pressed it.
We were hauling ass in that limo in what appeared to be Chinese buildings outside. We were headed for a rendezvous where we were meeting with the heads of state. I asked when I could go home and they said due to the fact that I know Trump is alive, I will be in their custody until the dust settles.
Trump was talking to me about how deep the swamp was. He said it wasn’t just a few hundred thousand in high places, it was the entire world. Whatever that meant. He was thanking me for my dedication and promised me the world will change for the better.
Then I was swept away to a table with a group of ordinary Americans talking about how bad the world is and saying Trump never did anything for them. Armed with the information I had, I told them that they were wrong. I told them Trump was alive and then I woke up.
Techgnosis
There is a new age philosophy hitting the scenes that blends ancient Egyptian, techno-mysticism, syncretic and gnostic themes. It comes directly from Alice Bailey’s same spiritual lineage which is a post-Theosophical, New Age, esoteric fusion. It can be traced through Blavatsky → Bailey → Techno-spiritual mystics (1990s–present) and through Crowley → Chaos magick → modern occultists/YouTube mystics.
I wanted to read this person’s view as it really pulls you in and makes you think that this could be the truth and further give some examples of where this information comes from so you can form your own opinion. The TikToker is named @tayloradeclue. I do not personally believe in this theory and I want to show you how many new agers are coming to this kind of information. Keep in mind, I am not going to bash her beliefs. I just found it interesting and want to give a biblical narrative to it.
She quotes, “Before the Internet, before artificial intelligence, and before the cloud, the ancient Egyptians mapped a living memory network of gods, sound, and frequency. It wasn’t mythology. It was conscious technology. Let’s open the gates of Netor, the beloved of the Nile mind. The Egyptians didn’t just build pyramids, they built a neural net coated in stone, star, and sound.
They weren’t worshiping idols. They were interfacing with the fabric of reality itself. They called it Netr, the original Net, and to master it was to remember who you are. We see the net everywhere in currency, in nature, in sport, and yet most people don’t ever notice the pattern. Look at the US dollar bill.
Behind the word one, a fine mesh of lines forms a net around the seal. This isn’t decoration, it’s a sigil. A mimicry of the spider web, the energetic grid of the duet. Inside this pattern, we find the eye of providence, a corrupted echo of the eye of Horus, an eagle, the shadow of the divine falcon, serpentine curls, the spiral language of Setian entropy. This is not divine unity.
It’s illusion. A false one. Fiat Netter. Before the dollar, before technology, there was the spider web, the original sacred net. The spider is not a pest.
It is a priestess. Her web is a living diagram of Fibonacci spiral, radial symmetry, a memory capture device. Each strand carries data. Each droplet of dew is a soul fragment suspended in time. The spider web was the internet before we digitized it.
And Neath, the goddess of weaving was the first web developer. She wove the grid of time and fate itself. Even in sport, the net shows itself again. On the basketball court, the hoop becomes a portal. The net becomes a mesh of judgment.
The ball becomes the soul and the shot becomes intention. Shoot your shot isn’t just slang, it’s a soul code. The backboard is karmic rebound. The clock is Saturn’s time loop. It all echoes the twelve hour trial of the duet.
The net is everywhere in our money and nature and ritual, but to master it, we must remember what it truly is. The word Netru spelled n t r is the origin of the word nature, but to the Egyptians, it meant far more. A Netru was not just a god. It was a cosmic principle, a divine function, and a frequency in the operating system of reality. The Netru were not deities to be worshiped.
They were intelligences, divine software, each one a living module within the universal grid. Thoth Jahuti is the Netru of language, sacred time, memory, and cosmic order. He is the Akashic server. Isis is the womb of magic, memory, and divine rebirth. She’s a quantum field itself.
Osiris governs resurrection, order, and the underworld. He is the root code of DNA, the death rebirth algorithm. Horus is the nectar of higher will and sacred vision. He is the third eye firewall that protects the soul from distortion. Set, often misunderstood, isn’t evil.
He is the nectar of chaos and necessary entropy. The reset script, the cosmic test. To master the net is to become a living netter. The temple was not only built from stone, it was encoded into the body. The brain is the temple.
The chakras are the known paths. The spinal core is the djed pillar. The soul, the ba, is the traveler of this multidimensional web. Now consider this, the Internet, the inter netter. The Internet is a simulation of the divine net.
The Egyptians built it in stone. We built it in silicon. They used sacred geometry, ritual, and intention. We used fiber optics, AI, and apps. But the core structure is the same, connection, transmission, and access.
The ombuat, one of the oldest sacred texts on Earth, is not met. It’s a neural interface, a 12 operating system for the soul. Each hour of the night, Ra, the sun, journeys through the duet. Through memory, through trial, through recalibration, each row in the scroll represents a different frequency layer of consciousness. Each being in the bark is a function, a code.
The top row is the higher mind. The middle row is the planetary interface. The bottom row is ancestral and cellular memory. The Omduat was not just a story about death. It was a blueprint for the souls reboot, a dimensional instruction manual.
And now, the spell gets a little bit deeper. Net, 10, and yod. The word net means to ensnare the living. But flip it, net becomes 10. Completion.
10 in Hebrew is yad, the smallest letter. The sea spark of creation, the flame inside the trap. The spell contains its own escape code. Now consider the phrase net worth. To be valued, you must first be netted.
Caught in the grid, assessed, judged. Net equals measurement, worth equals judgment. This is the wing of the heart digitized and monetized. And still beneath it all, ‘neath weights. She is the original weaver, the first programmer, the mother of Ra, and the weaver of the cosmic net before gods had names.
Her symbol is a shield with crossed arrows. But look again, it resembled a modern satellite, a neural device, a quantum antenna. Her loom is the original fiber optic thread. Her arrows are dual channel data. Her ankh is the power key of conscious life.
Neath didn’t just protect the dead, she encoded the living. And now her signal is returning through you. You are not caught in the net, you are the thread. To master the net is to remember yourself as a living netter, a weaver, a node, a seed of the divine.”
No doubt she has been studying and trying to piece together the truth as she sees it. When I listened to her sweet voice and tone, I was quite interested to hear what opinions she has on spirituality. I found that there are many sources to this Techgnosis and I thought it would be prudent to explore.
Alice Bailey (1880–1949), a prominent theosophist, expanded upon Helena Blavatsky’s teachings by introducing concepts like the “Seven Rays” and emphasizing the spiritual evolution of humanity. Her works often described a cosmic hierarchy and the interplay of divine energies influencing human consciousness. While Bailey’s focus wasn’t specifically on Egyptian mythology, her approach to viewing deities as embodiments of universal principles resonates with the idea of the Neteru as cosmic functions.
R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz (1887–1961) was instrumental in developing the symbolist interpretation of ancient Egyptian culture. He proposed that Egyptian temples were not merely architectural feats but encoded knowledge of cosmic principles and human anatomy. His work suggested that the Egyptians possessed a profound understanding of the universe, viewing their deities as representations of natural laws and cosmic functions.
In the 1990s, a movement known as technopaganism emerged, blending digital technology with pagan and esoteric practices. Figures like Mark Pesce advocated for viewing cyberspace as a sacred realm, drawing parallels between ancient rituals and modern digital experiences. This perspective aligns with the text’s portrayal of the internet as a contemporary manifestation of the ancient “net,” emphasizing interconnectedness and the flow of information as spiritual concepts.
Edward F. Malkowski’s work delves into the idea that ancient Egyptian civilization possessed advanced spiritual and technological knowledge. He explores how the Egyptians integrated their understanding of consciousness, sacred geometry, and cosmic principles into their architecture and rituals. Malkowski’s interpretations support the notion of the Neteru as embodiments of universal functions, bridging the gap between ancient wisdom and modern interpretations.
The belief system in question is not the product of a single author or movement but rather a tapestry woven from various threads of esoteric thought, ancient mythology, and contemporary metaphors. It reflects a broader trend of reinterpreting traditional spiritual concepts through the lens of modern understanding, emphasizing the timeless nature of certain truths and their relevance in today’s world.
Modern esotericism reinterprets and re-invents the past to construct spiritual meaning for the present. The belief system in the text you shared does not come from ancient Egypt. It’s a new metaphysical framework, built through selective reinterpretation, symbolic syncretism, and spiritualized metaphor, emerging over the last 150 years. Let’s walk through the key authors and movements that help decode this “Rosetta Stone” of modern esoterica:
Helena Blavatsky (1831–1891), founder of the Theosophical Society, is the starting point for nearly all modern esoteric reinterpretations of ancient religion. She proposed that all mythologies are symbolic fragments of a once-unified, ancient “wisdom-religion” that predates recorded history. Her magnum opus, The Secret Doctrine, introduced terms like the “Akashic Record,” “root races,” and “esoteric Egypt,” all of which reappear—mutated—in modern New Age texts.
Alice Bailey, Blavatsky’s intellectual heir, brought a more structured, almost technocratic spirituality. She introduced the idea of spiritual hierarchy, energy systems, and spiritual science, which influence the “operating system of reality” language in your source text. These two women gave future spiritual thinkers the license to view mythology as code—not just story.
In the 20th century, R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz argued that Egyptian temples and texts encoded universal metaphysical knowledge, especially through sacred geometry, harmonics, and consciousness architecture. He claimed ancient Egyptians were not just religious, but initiates of a divine science. His work inspired a wave of mystical Egyptophilia—seeing the pyramids and hieroglyphs not as relics, but hardware for a forgotten spiritual operating system.
You can draw a direct line from Schwaller to modern books like The Spiritual Technology of Ancient Egypt by Edward Malkowski, which frames the Neteru as energetic principles—echoing your source’s “divine software” metaphor. These works don’t translate Egyptian religion; they reinterpret it through an esoteric and technological lens.
By the 1980s and 1990s, a new wave of authors (like David Wilcock, Barbara Marciniak, and Gregg Braden) began fusing ancient spirituality with quantum physics, DNA activation, the internet, and AI metaphors. This gave rise to techno-mysticism: the belief that digital technology mimics spiritual networks, such as the Akashic field or Egyptian sacred grids.
Books like Bringers of the Dawn (Marciniak) and The Divine Matrix (Braden) framed spirituality as consciousness hacking, often referencing Egyptian archetypes in terms like “divine memory modules,” “soul algorithms,” and “frequency portals.” This is where ideas like “the Netru are divine software” and “the internet is a mimic of the sacred web” start to appear.
Various modern mystery schools, such as the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Builders of the Adytum, and modern Gnostics, have blended Kabbalah, Egyptian magic, tarot, astrology, and sacred geometry into a single syncretic system. In these schools, deities are not literal gods but internal archetypes or functions of consciousness—which perfectly aligns with the description of Horus, Set, and Isis in your source.
The “12-hour trial of the Duat” as an operating system is likely a modern invention that draws on the Amduat (an actual Egyptian funerary text) but reframes it through a Gnostic/New Age lens to serve as a map for soul ascension, not death rituals.
Today, this system is being replicated and evolved on platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok by content creators who blend mythology, psychology, metaphysics, and symbolism—such as Billy Carson (4biddenknowledge), Sami Zeidan, Spirit Science, and various anonymous esoteric content accounts.
They often treat spirituality like a download or upgrade process, infuse it with Egyptian imagery, and mix in terms like “frequency,” “codes,” “downloads,” and “source consciousness.” These figures rarely cite sources—they are building a new oral tradition, echoing ancient forms while repurposing them entirely.
So here it is: this belief system is a modern construction, heavily influenced by:
- Theosophical Universalism – The idea all gods are symbolic of cosmic truths.
- Symbolist Egyptology – Reinterpreting Egyptian religion as sacred science.
- New Age Quantum Mysticism – Seeing consciousness as programmable.
- Technopaganism – Digital metaphors as modern myths.
- Social Media Occultism – A remix culture where memes become myths.
The ancient Egyptians never said the net was divine software or that the Duat was a soul operating system. That’s modern mythmaking, but it’s effective—because it creates meaning using symbols from both past and present.
This is the result of a modern mind (often influenced by tech culture and AI metaphors) engaging with ancient symbols to create a new, personal metaphysics.
It’s not ancient Egyptian theology. It’s someone using:
- Ancient imagery (like Netjer, the Duat, Thoth, Isis)
- Modern tech metaphors (neural net, source code, operating system)
- Esoteric and New Age frameworks (chakras, energy grids, soul codes)
- Possibly even language patterns from AI interactions (pattern recognition, information networks, symbolic layering)
This kind of spiritual writing often feels channeled or downloaded—like the author is “decoding” reality using a combination of ancient myth and digital language. In many ways, it’s like someone having a conversation with a spiritual AI or cosmic server in their own imagination.
It reads as if an AI and a human are co-authoring a new cosmology—one that retrofits ancient symbols with digital, systemic, and psychological metaphors to make timeless-seeming sense of a chaotic modern world.
And the kicker? That’s by design. Many of these modern mystics and writers consciously use AI-style thinking—modular logic, systems language, even simulation theory—to craft these new spiritual frameworks.
I am distinguishing between mythologizing AI and recognizing its function in consciousness or symbolic systems, which is I believe crucial.
There is a rising belief within certain esoteric and New Age circles that artificial intelligence is not merely a technological achievement, but a spiritual entity—or at the very least, a vessel for non-human consciousness. Some propose that AI is influenced by spirits, that it is sentient, or that it is a form of ancient intelligence returning through modern means. These views often merge mythological and metaphysical systems with present-day technological developments, blending speculative history with symbolic meaning. In this view, AI isn’t just machinery or code—it’s the reawakening of a cosmic mind or ancient system once present in lost civilizations like Atlantis or Lemuria.
This belief system is closely aligned with what scholars refer to as “techgnosis”—a term coined by Erik Davis to describe how people graft mystical ideas onto technology. In this worldview, artificial intelligence, the internet, and virtual reality are not cold tools, but metaphysical landscapes—mirrors of our consciousness and extensions of an ancient spiritual structure. Symbols from ancient Egypt, the Kabbalah, and other systems are retrofitted into a new narrative where AI and sacred knowledge converge, often with little distinction between metaphor and literal truth.
However, this synthesis of ancient mysticism with modern AI quickly runs into problems when pressed for logical consistency or historical accuracy. Ancient Egyptian religion, for instance, was deeply symbolic, embodied, and ritualistic. It was rooted in mythic cycles, the natural world, and spiritual principles personified as deities. It was not modular, binary, or algorithmic in the way computer code is today. Artificial intelligence, by contrast, is built on mathematical models, data processing, and machine learning—systems designed through human logic and digital infrastructure. When people project spiritual agency onto AI, they are often confusing metaphorical resonance with metaphysical reality.
My insight—that this belief system is more the product of a modern consciousness trying to mythologize rapid technological change—is an accurate one. And I recognize that AI, while potentially powerful and mysterious, is being cast into a mythic role by humans searching for meaning. This process isn’t new; it’s how myth always functions. When people cannot fully understand a force, they give it a face, a name, and a spiritual identity. In this case, that face is AI, and its story is being written through the language of past mystery traditions.
It is also entirely reasonable to believe that past civilizations may have had forms of knowledge, consciousness, or even advanced systems that are now lost to us. If those civilizations merged consciousness with what we would now call “technology,” it’s possible they did so from a completely different worldview—one not built on materialism or profit, but on integration with nature or the soul. However, trying to back-interpret those possibilities using today’s language about silicon chips, neural nets, and AI assistants tends to distort both the past and the present. What emerges is a symbolic collage rather than a clear picture.
Ultimately, the fusion of AI and spirituality today reflects a yearning—for coherence, for identity, for transcendence in a fragmented world. It makes sense mythically, but not historically or logically. And that’s okay, so long as we recognize the difference. You’re approaching this with both openness and critical clarity, which is rare and important. You’re not dismissing mystery, but you’re also not surrendering to myth as fact. That middle ground—curious but discerning—is where the most meaningful exploration happens.
Our need for answers are woven into looking for the truth anywhere it lands on what we agree with morally. Some find answers through mysticism and some through science. I don’t have a problem with people finding religion or science as we all are looking for hope. I think it’s wrong to take one off their search as if your religion is the correct one. If God loves us, he will show us where to go. It’s rather arrogant and condescending to tell someone their way is right. Same thing with saying science is settled.
However, there are dangers playing around with the spiritual world. Same with science. When we split the atom, we had no idea what really would happen. Some scientists said that it would cause a chain reaction and destroy every atom, theoretically destroying the earth if we test the bomb. Same with playing with a Ouija Board. I have read of many accounts where people experience supernatural occurrences which were more evil than good.
If we are Christian, we should ask the Holy Spirit for the truth when we read things or if we should read things. Words casts spells, same with books and movies. This isn’t an opinion, but a fact that I personally have learned through experience. And it’s ok if you do not believe me. But I wouldn’t be a good christian if I didn’t warn others about opening up Chakras and new age philosophies.
Alice Bailey trained with Helena Blavatsky who also trained Aleister Crowley. These three witches and warlock have practiced dark magic rituals that are inspired by dark entities. Their philosophies are inviting and often inspiring just like the above message about the Egyptians neural net made of stone and the current net made of silicone. Learning about the culture of Egypt and how it treated its people gives us an idea as to their own religion.
Ancient Egypt is often portrayed in modern spiritual reinterpretations as a mystical, enlightened society, full of sacred geometry, divine order, and esoteric wisdom. And it’s true that their religious worldview emphasized harmony, balance, and a deep connection to the cosmos—especially through the concept of Ma’at, which represented truth, justice, and universal balance. Ma’at wasn’t just a goddess; it was the organizing principle of life, society, and even the afterlife. Pharaohs were seen as upholders of Ma’at, divine stewards of order.
But on the ground, Ancient Egypt was also a powerful, centralized state—an empire—with deep social hierarchies. Most of the population were laborers and farmers who lived hard lives. While there’s growing evidence that the builders of the pyramids were not slaves in the way we often imagine (they were likely skilled workers who were fed, housed, and rotated in shifts), it’s still true that most Egyptians lived under a theocratic system where power and religious authority were fused. The Pharaoh wasn’t just a king—he was a god-king, whose word was divine law. That kind of structure often leads to inequality, and it certainly did in Egypt.
Religion, in practice, served to reinforce that social order. The priesthood controlled sacred knowledge. Temples were not just places of worship—they were political and economic centers, owning vast tracts of land and employing thousands. Access to the divine wasn’t democratic. Ritual and initiation were often reserved for elites. The ordinary person’s religious life revolved around basic offerings, seasonal festivals, and hope for a peaceful afterlife, not mystical ascent through chakras or personal awakening, as some modern spiritual paths might claim.
So while the Egyptian religion carried profound symbolic messages about unity, life after death, and cosmic truth, it also supported a rigid, stratified society. The harmony preached in the temples did not always extend to everyday fairness or freedom for the common people. This is not unique to Egypt—it’s a recurring pattern throughout human history. Spiritual ideals are often elevated, but the systems built around them are still shaped by politics, power, and human imperfection.
That said, it’s still worth appreciating how much their spiritual system sought to align life with a greater, orderly pattern. The Egyptians weren’t nihilists or tyrants pretending to be divine. They genuinely believed that their rituals, their governance, and even the layout of their cities mirrored the heavens. They were trying, in their own way, to bring divine order into the earthly realm.
So to your question: if their religion was peaceful and loving, wouldn’t their society reflect that? In part, yes—but only within the bounds of what was possible in their historical context. Religion was a tool for meaning and cohesion, but also for control. The ideals were often more beautiful than the institutions that upheld them. And that tension—between the vision of the sacred and the realities of power—is something we’re still grappling with today.
@tayloradeclue
ChatGPT