Watch on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5h8xlp-is-enoch-scripture.html
This is a sensitive subject because the first book of Enoch explains so much of what is happening right now. It deals with Enoch and his relationship with the watchers who were mentioned in Genesis 6.
According to theology, the Book of Enoch was Not Included in the Canon Bible because:
• Late Date: The Book of Enoch was written centuries after the Old Testament canon was closed, likely in the 2nd or 1st century BCE.
• Jewish Rejection: Jewish authorities, who established the Old Testament canon, did not consider Enoch to be inspired Scripture.
• Lack of Apostolic Endorsement: The New Testament does not explicitly reference or endorse Enoch, suggesting it was not considered part of the authoritative Christian canon.
• Contradictions with Established Canon: Some teachings in Enoch contradict or expand on the Old Testament, leading to questions about its consistency with the established biblical narrative.
• Apocalyptic Nature: Enoch contains significant apocalyptic elements, which may have made it less appealing to early Christian communities that emphasized the historical and prophetic aspects of the Bible.
• Early Church Disagreement: While some early Church Fathers valued Enoch, there was no universal consensus on its canonical status.
• Focus on the Gospels and Apostles: The early Church prioritized the Gospels and the writings of the Apostles as the foundational texts of Christianity, leading to a focus on these books in the formation of the canon.
Contradictions Between Enoch and the Established Canon
Here are some examples of teachings in the Book of Enoch that diverge from the Old Testament canon:
1. The Watchers and Fallen Angels
• Enoch: Describes a group of angels called the Watchers who descended to Earth, married human women, and produced Nephilim (giants).
• Old Testament: While there are mentions of giants, the Old Testament does not explicitly link them to angelic beings or forbidden unions.
2. The Flood Narrative
• Enoch: Provides a more detailed account of the Flood, including the reasons for God’s judgment and the fate of the Watchers.
• Old Testament: The Genesis account of the Flood focuses on Noah and his family as the only survivors.
3. The Afterlife
• Enoch: Describes a detailed hierarchy of heavens and hells, with specific punishments for different sins.
• Old Testament: While the Old Testament hints at a concept of the afterlife, it does not provide as explicit a description as Enoch.
4. The Messianic Figure
• Enoch: Identifies a figure called the “Son of Man” who will judge the world and usher in a new era.
• Old Testament: While the concept of a messianic figure is present in the Old Testament, the specific details and titles associated with this figure differ from those found in Enoch.
These discrepancies, among others, contributed to the decision of early Christian authorities to exclude the Book of Enoch from the canonical Old Testament
Here are a few more examples of contradictions between the Book of Enoch and the established Old Testament canon:
5. The Origin of Humanity
• Enoch: Presents a more elaborate account of humanity’s creation, including the role of angels in the process.
• Old Testament: The Genesis account focuses on God’s direct creation of Adam and Eve from dust.
6. The End Times
• Enoch: Offers a detailed prophecy about the end of the world, including the appearance of a new heaven and a new earth.
• Old Testament: While the Old Testament contains prophecies about the end times, they are often more general and less specific than those found in Enoch.
7. The Nature of Angels
• Enoch: Describes a complex hierarchy of angels with different roles and responsibilities.
• Old Testament: While the Old Testament mentions angels, it does not provide as detailed a classification or hierarchy.
These additional examples further illustrate the discrepancies between the Book of Enoch and the established Old Testament canon, contributing to its exclusion from the canonical texts.
The discrepancies between the Book of Enoch and the Old Testament canon do not necessarily prove that we should not believe it.
While these differences are significant, they do not definitively invalidate the book’s teachings.
Here are some important considerations:
• Historical Context: The Book of Enoch was written centuries after the Old Testament canon was closed. It’s possible that the author was drawing on traditions and beliefs that were not included in the canonical texts.
• Cultural and Religious Influences: The book may have been influenced by contemporary cultural and religious beliefs that were not fully represented in the Old Testament.
• Purpose and Audience: The Book of Enoch may have been written for a specific audience and purpose, which could explain why it contains teachings that diverge from the canonical texts.
Ultimately, whether or not to believe in the Book of Enoch is a personal decision. While it is not considered canonical, it offers a fascinating glimpse into the beliefs and practices of early Judaism and Christianity. Some people may find its teachings valuable and inspiring, while others may choose to rely primarily on the canonical texts.
The Dead Sea Scrolls provide the earliest known copies of the Book of Enoch. These scrolls were discovered in the Qumran Caves near the Dead Sea in Israel between 1947 and 1956. The specific fragments of Enoch found among the Dead Sea Scrolls date back to the
2nd or 1st century BCE.
Prior to the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, the earliest known copies of Enoch were found in Ethiopian and Arabic translations, which date back to the 4th century CE or later.
There is truth to the claim that the Book of Enoch originates from Jewish mysticism.
The book is a clear example of Jewish apocalyptic literature, a genre that often incorporates mystical elements such as visions, revelations, and encounters with celestial beings. Enoch, the central figure of the book, is depicted as a prophet who ascends to the heavens and receives secret knowledge.
Here are some specific examples of mystical elements in the Book of Enoch:
• Ascension: Enoch’s journey through the heavens is a classic example of a mystical ascent, a common motif in Jewish and other mystical traditions.
• Angelic encounters: Enoch encounters various angels and celestial beings, who reveal to him secrets about the universe and the divine plan.
• Symbolic language: The book employs symbolic language and imagery, which is characteristic of mystical texts.
• Eschatological visions: Enoch’s visions of the end times and the coming of the Messiah are rooted in Jewish apocalyptic traditions, which often incorporate mystical elements.
Overall, the Book of Enoch is a rich source of Jewish mystical thought and provides valuable insights into the beliefs and practices of early Judaism.
The connection between the Book of Enoch and Kabbalah is complex and debated. While there are some similarities, it’s not entirely accurate to say that Enoch directly originates from Kabbalistic thought.
Here’s a breakdown of the relationship:
• Shared themes: Both Enoch and Kabbalah explore mystical concepts such as the divine hierarchy, angels, and the nature of reality.
• Influences: It’s possible that the authors of Enoch were influenced by earlier mystical traditions that later developed into Kabbalah.
• Distinct traditions: Despite the similarities, Enoch and Kabbalah developed as separate traditions with their own unique characteristics.
While Enoch and Kabbalah share some common ground, it’s more accurate to say that they are both part of the broader tradition of Jewish mysticism. The relationship between the two is complex and multifaceted, and it’s not entirely clear how much influence one had on the other.
The connection between the Book of Enoch and Metatron is a fascinating one. Metatron is a figure who appears in Jewish mystical traditions, particularly Kabbalah. He is often described as a powerful angel or even a celestial being who serves as God’s scribe or messenger.
There are several ways in which Metatron is connected to the Book of Enoch:
• The Son of Man: Some scholars believe that the “Son of Man” figure described in Enoch is actually Metatron. This interpretation is based on the idea that Metatron is a powerful celestial being who plays a key role in God’s plan for the world.
• The scribe of God: Metatron is often depicted as the scribe of God, recording the divine decrees and overseeing the universe. This role aligns with the idea of a powerful celestial being who is involved in the cosmic order, as described in Enoch.
• The mediator between God and humanity: Metatron is sometimes seen as a mediator between God and humanity, interceding on behalf of humanity and conveying God’s will. This role is similar to that of the angels in Enoch, who often act as messengers and intermediaries between the divine and the human realms.
While the exact relationship between Metatron and the Book of Enoch is a subject of ongoing debate, it’s clear that these two figures are closely connected in Jewish mystical traditions. The idea that Metatron may be the “Son of Man” described in Enoch is a fascinating one that adds another layer of complexity to our understanding of this ancient text.
Metatron is worshipped by the Kabbalists. He’s seen in many movies and television shows like Supernatural. Abaddon is also referenced in Kabbalism. This is the bearer of false light and Luciferianism teachings. Mustardseedhannah a TikTok creator says she came from this religion and she was saved by Jesus out of this religion. She mentions many Christians point to Enoch and say this is Christianity. She claims it is not.
Online, there are more cons of Enoch than there are pros for it. Pastor after pastor say to stay away from it. No, Jesus does not explicitly quote the Book of Enoch in the New Testament. While some scholars have proposed potential parallels or allusions between the two texts, there is no definitive evidence that Jesus directly referenced Enoch.
It’s important to note that the New Testament canon was established centuries after the Book of Enoch was written. Therefore, it’s unlikely that Jesus would have had access to or knowledge of Enoch.
While there may be some similarities between the teachings of Jesus and Enoch, these similarities are more likely due to shared cultural and religious influences rather than direct influence.
Genesis 5:21-24 is the only place where it mentions Enoch. When Enoch was 65 years old, he fathered Methuselah. 22 After Enoch fathered Methuselah, he lived 300 years and fathered other sons and daughters. 23 So Enoch’s life totaled 365 years. 24 Then Enoch walked with God; after that, he was no more, because God took him away.
No, the Book of Enoch does not explicitly explain the phenomenon of UFOs. While it does contain references to celestial beings and otherworldly phenomena, it does not directly address the modern concept of unidentified flying objects.
It’s important to note that the Book of Enoch is an ancient text, and its interpretations can vary widely. Some people may interpret certain passages as referring to extraterrestrial beings or advanced technology, but there is no clear consensus on this.
Ultimately, the question of UFOs is a complex one with no easy answers. While the Book of Enoch may offer some intriguing insights into ancient beliefs about the nature of the cosmos and the divine, it does not provide a definitive explanation for modern UFO phenomena.
Yes, it’s possible to interpret the Book of Enoch and the concept of UFOs and aliens as related to the “Watchers” or fallen angels.
The Book of Enoch describes a group of angels called the Watchers who descended to Earth, married human women, and produced Nephilim (giants). Some interpretations of this story suggest that these Watchers may have brought advanced knowledge or technology to Earth, which could be seen as a parallel to the idea of extraterrestrial beings.
However, it’s important to note that this is just one interpretation, and there are many other ways to understand the Watchers and their role in the Book of Enoch. Additionally, there is no clear evidence that the Watchers are directly related to the modern phenomenon of UFOs.
Ultimately, the connection between the Book of Enoch, UFOs, and aliens is a matter of speculation and interpretation. There is no definitive answer, and different people may have different perspectives on this topic.
The book of Enoch was found 100 years before Christ died. It was written about 100 years earlier. Enoch and his time on earth was 4,000 years prior. Arguments about how new this book is are very valid. There is nothing out there found that about Enoch prior. Even though it was found in the Dead Sea scrolls, it still is dated 100 – 200 years before Christ’s death. This doesn’t help in its authenticity. The real Jews and not the Khazarian white Jews rejected the book. The New Testament doesn’t refer to it at all nor to Enoch. So if Jesus wanted us to read it, he would have quoted it. In fact, Jesus died to put an end to the law. Reading Enoch should be done with discernment. Prayer as well. I always advocate to read everything. Turn over every stone. Why is because when I go gold mining, I never find gold if I dig in one spot. You have to dig everywhere and dig deep.
The book of Enoch most likely isn’t canon and was written by Jewish mystics for whatever reason. I say most likely because there is more proof it’s not canon than there is to support it. You can read it and compare to the Bible but there is only one place where they kind of converge and that is Genesis 6. But even Genesis is full of holes and offers so many questions. We can’t rely on Enoch as scripture but we can use it to put pieces together. Most scrolls vary and steer away from scripture as there are over 5,000 of them found so far. But only 66 made it. 39 in the old and 27 in the new.
That doesn’t mean there are scrolls that are not hidden. The Vatican library holds 80,000 from antiquity. If there is another scroll that explains Enoch better, if anyone would have it, it would be them.
Not just anyone can access the Vatican Library. It’s a highly restricted institution primarily open to:
• Scholars and researchers: Those with advanced degrees and relevant publications in fields such as history, theology, and philosophy.
• University professors: Faculty members who have a legitimate academic need to access the library’s resources.
• Graduate students: Those pursuing doctoral dissertations and can demonstrate a specific research need.
Even with these qualifications, access may be limited and requires a formal application and approval process. The library’s goal is to ensure that its resources are used for serious academic research.
While the general public cannot visit the Vatican Library, they can still enjoy the Vatican Museums and other attractions within Vatican City.
So, now what? We can only speculate who the sons of god are and who the watchers are. We can’t rely on the book of Enoch but we can get clues by what the authors are trying to say and do. The question remains, who wrote it and why?
The authorship of the Book of Enoch is unknown. It is generally believed to have been written by a Jewish scribe or group of scribes sometime between the 3rd century BCE and the 1st century CE. The exact author or authors remain a mystery.
The book is attributed to Enoch, a figure mentioned in the Old Testament, but it’s important to note that this is a pseudonym or literary device. The actual author or authors likely used the name Enoch to lend credibility to their work and associate it with the biblical tradition.
But it was enough of an impact to also be found again word for word in the Dead Sea scrolls. This means it has meaning for someone or something. We can only compare the intentions of the author to those of evil and what they were trying to achieve say for example the Talmud versus the Torah.
The Talmud and the Torah are two important texts in Jewish religious and cultural life, but they serve different purposes and have distinct characteristics.
The Torah is the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, also known as the Pentateuch. It contains the most fundamental laws and teachings of Judaism, including the Ten Commandments. The Torah is considered the most sacred text in Judaism and is read and studied in synagogues and homes throughout the year.
The Talmud is a vast collection of rabbinic discussions and interpretations of the Torah and other Jewish texts. It is divided into two main parts: the Gemara, which contains the actual debates and rulings of the rabbis, and the Mishnah, which is a compilation of earlier rabbinic teachings. The Talmud is a complex and multifaceted text that covers a wide range of topics, from law and ethics to philosophy and mysticism.
Here are some key differences between the Talmud and the Torah:
• Purpose: The Torah is primarily a book of law and teaching, while the Talmud is a collection of rabbinic discussions and interpretations.
• Scope: The Torah focuses on the fundamental laws and principles of Judaism, while the Talmud covers a much wider range of topics.
• Complexity: The Talmud is a much more complex and challenging text than the Torah, requiring extensive study and interpretation.
• Role in Jewish life: Both the Torah and the Talmud play important roles in Jewish life, but the Torah is generally considered to be more fundamental and essential.
The Torah and the Talmud are two essential texts in Judaism, each with its own unique characteristics and purpose. The Torah provides the foundational laws and teachings, while the Talmud offers a rich and diverse collection of rabbinic interpretations and discussions.
The Torah can be compared to several copies and confirmed authentic. The Talmud is interpretation of the Torah. The same can be said about Enoch. Perhaps someone read Genesis 6 and wrote Enoch as an interpretation. How and where they got the entire story of the watchers and Metatron is unknown. Perhaps through seance or meditation or prayer. We don’t know because the author left us no clues as to where they found this information. I have read many books. And I can assure you the majority of them are opinion based on interpretation and bias. Facts are presented but not backed by second sources. This is because we see what we want to see and any yahoo can write a book. Especially now with AI. Enoch is an adventure. It’s way more profound than any other scripture in the communication with the spiritual world. That too, doesn’t give it credibility. If I had to make an educated guess, I would have to say that this book was made to throw us off of the truth. Which sucks because it fills in many holes as to the flood, the watchers and what the sons of god did. It leaves us back to square one.
Ok so that explains the first book. Did you know there are two more? Enoch 2 and 3.
Enoch 2 is a pseudepigraphical text, meaning it is attributed to a historical figure (Enoch) but was likely written by someone else. It’s part of a larger body of works called the “Book of Enoch,” which is not considered canonical by most Christian denominations.
Key differences between Enoch 2 and the current Bible:
1. Canonicity: The Bible is a collection of texts considered sacred by Christian and Jewish traditions. Enoch 2 is not included in the canonical scriptures of either tradition.
2. Content: Enoch 2 contains unique material, such as detailed descriptions of heavenly realms, the fall of angels, and the nature of sin. While some of these themes are touched upon in the Bible, the specific details and interpretations often differ.
3. Interpretation: Enoch 2 is often interpreted allegorically or symbolically, while the Bible is generally interpreted more literally.
4. Influence: While Enoch 2 has influenced certain Christian traditions and beliefs, its impact is less direct than that of the canonical scriptures.
Similarities between Enoch 2 and the Bible:
• Theme of sin and redemption: Both texts explore the concepts of sin, its consequences, and the hope of redemption.
• Focus on the afterlife: Both texts discuss the nature of the afterlife and the ultimate destiny of human beings.
• Belief in God: Both texts affirm the existence of a higher power, often referred to as God.
While Enoch 2 shares some themes and concepts with the Bible, it is a distinct text with its own unique characteristics. Its non-canonical status means that it is not considered authoritative within mainstream Christian or Jewish traditions. However, it can be a valuable resource for those interested in exploring the broader context of ancient Jewish and Christian beliefs.
Enoch 2 was discovered in the 19th century. It was part of a larger collection of texts known as the “Ethiopic Book of Enoch,” which was brought to Europe from Ethiopia in the early 19th century. Scholars began to study and translate these texts, leading to the discovery and analysis of Enoch 2.
Enoch 3 is another pseudepigraphical text attributed to Enoch, and it’s also part of the “Book of Enoch.” Like Enoch 2, it’s not considered canonical by most Christian denominations.
Key Differences
1. Canonicity: Similar to Enoch 2, Enoch 3 is not included in the canonical scriptures of Christianity or Judaism.
2. Content: Enoch 3 primarily focuses on the theme of angels and their roles in the world. It contains detailed descriptions of different types of angels, their hierarchy, and their interactions with humans.
3. Interpretation: Like other pseudepigraphical texts, Enoch 3 is often interpreted allegorically or symbolically.
4. Influence: While Enoch 3 has influenced certain Christian traditions and beliefs, its impact is less direct than that of the canonical scriptures.
Similarities
• Belief in God: Both Enoch 3 and the Bible affirm the existence of a higher power, often referred to as God.
• Focus on spiritual beings: Both texts discuss the existence of spiritual beings, such as angels and demons.
• Theme of sin and redemption: While not as prominent as in Enoch 2, the theme of sin and redemption is present in Enoch 3.
Discovery of Enoch 3
Enoch 3 was discovered along with the rest of the Ethiopian Book of Enoch in the 19th century. The specific discovery of Enoch 3 as a separate text within the larger collection occurred during the process of studying and translating the Ethiopian manuscripts.
Enoch 3 is a pseudepigraphical text that provides unique insights into ancient Jewish and Christian beliefs about angels and their role in the world. While it’s not considered canonical, it can be a valuable resource for those interested in exploring the broader context of religious thought.
Discrepancies Between the Bible and Enoch 2 and 3
While both the Bible and the pseudepigraphical texts of Enoch 2 and 3 share some common themes, there are significant discrepancies between them. These discrepancies arise primarily due to the different origins and purposes of these texts.
1. Canonicity
• Bible: The Bible is considered the sacred text of Christianity and Judaism, and its canonicity is widely accepted.
• Enoch 2 and 3: These texts are not included in the canonical scriptures of either tradition.
2. Content and Interpretation
• Bible: The Bible generally presents a more straightforward and literal interpretation of religious concepts.
• Enoch 2 and 3: These texts often employ allegorical and symbolic language, and their interpretations can vary widely.
3. Origin and Purpose
• Bible: The Bible is a collection of texts that developed over centuries and was shaped by various religious and cultural influences.
• Enoch 2 and 3: These texts are believed to have been written during a particular period in Jewish history and may reflect specific concerns or beliefs of that time.
4. Theological Emphasis
• Bible: The Bible emphasizes the importance of the covenant between God and humanity, as well as the role of Jesus Christ as the Messiah.
• Enoch 2 and 3: While these texts also acknowledge God’s role and the importance of righteousness, their focus is often on different aspects of religious thought, such as angelology and the nature of the afterlife.
5. Historical Context
• Bible: The Bible is rooted in the historical context of ancient Israel and the early Christian church.
• Enoch 2 and 3: These texts reflect the cultural and religious milieu of a later period in Jewish history.
In summary, while the Bible and Enoch 2 and 3 share some common themes, they differ significantly in terms of canonicity, content, interpretation, origin, purpose, theological emphasis, and historical context. These discrepancies highlight the diversity of religious thought within the broader Jewish and Christian traditions.
The authorship of Enoch 1, Enoch 2, and Enoch 3 is a complex and debated topic. While they are all attributed to the same biblical figure, Enoch, it is generally accepted that they were written by different authors at different times.
• Enoch 1: This text is generally considered to be the oldest of the three, dating back to the 3rd or 2nd century BCE. Its authorship is unknown, but it is believed to have been written by a Jewish author.
• Enoch 2: This text is thought to have been written in the 1st century CE. Its author is also unknown, but it is believed to be a Jewish work.
• Enoch 3: This text is considered to be the most recent of the three, dating back to the 3rd or 4th century CE. Its authorship is also unknown, but it is likely a Jewish work.
The first book is the oldest and has many issues for authenticity as we already described. The other two books are newer and most likely were written by Khazar jews.
There is a difference between Khazar Jews and the Jews who are scattered throughout the world as the bible says.
• Khazar Jews: These were a group of people who lived in the Khazar Empire, which was located in Central Asia from the 7th to the 10th centuries. They are believed to have converted to Judaism en masse in the 8th century. While some historians argue that the Khazar Jews were a significant part of Jewish history, others dispute their Jewish identity.
• Jews Scattered Throughout the World: This refers to the Jewish diaspora, which began after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE. Jews were forced to leave their homeland and were scattered throughout the world. Today, there are millions of Jews living in various countries, with significant populations in Israel, the United States, France, and other nations.
The key difference between Khazar Jews and the Jewish diaspora is their origin and historical context. The Khazar Jews were a relatively recent group who converted to Judaism in a specific geographic region, while the Jewish diaspora has existed for centuries and is composed of Jews from various backgrounds.
It’s important to note that the debate over the Jewish identity of the Khazar Jews continues. Some historians argue that they were true converts to Judaism, while others contend that they were merely adopting Jewish customs and practices for political or economic reasons.
The Khazar jews nor the Prussians did not write any of the books of Enoch as their empires were not built yet. But they base their religion based on the Talmud which is an interpretation of the Torah. We can only speculate who wrote all books of Enoch but one thing is for sure, the Khazar jews most likely believe in all of its teachings but not many theological Judaic jews. They believe they are not canon.
we can make an educated guess about the proportion of true and false information in the world. However, it’s important to remember that this is just a guess, and the actual proportions may vary depending on various factors.
Based on our understanding of human nature, cultural influences, technological advancements, and institutional factors, we can estimate that:
• A significant portion of information is accurate and truthful. This includes information that is based on empirical evidence, has been verified by multiple sources, and is consistent with established knowledge.
• A significant portion of information is inaccurate or misleading. This includes information that is based on biases, rumors, or misinformation, and that has not been verified or fact-checked.
• A portion of information is ambiguous or uncertain. This includes information that is open to interpretation or that is based on limited or incomplete evidence.
The exact proportions of true, false, and ambiguous information may vary depending on the specific context and the type of information being considered. For example, information related to scientific facts is generally more accurate than information related to political opinions or social rumors.
It’s also important to note that the proportion of true and false information may be changing over time due to factors such as the spread of misinformation online and the increasing sophistication of fact-checking tools.
There are also human intervention and interpretation issues like:
Misinterpretation: People may misunderstand or misremember the information they hear.
Selective perception: People may focus on certain details while ignoring others, leading to a distorted understanding of the information.
Assumptions and biases: People may add their own assumptions or biases to the information, altering its meaning.
Language barriers: If the information is being transmitted between people who do not speak the same language, there is a greater risk of miscommunication.
Now, given all of the information above, the first book of Enoch was found in the dead sea scrolls which most believe those are the most accurate set of information out there. They prove the canon old testament is real. Both second and third books were not there. This is another reason why many point to the first book of Enoch as authentic. But this doesn’t prove 1 Enoch was inspired by God. Most likely, the video on TikTok of @mustardseedhannah tends to be correct. 1 Enoch seems to be a scroll that was placed by some nefarious force to control the future narrative. That would mean something supernatural was involved as planning this book as it paints a current picture 2,000 years ago is absolutely insane to think about. Most likely, this was the work of the devil.
Sources
Gemini AI