Grieving Father of Ethiopia II: Restoring the God We Forgot

Watch this on rumble: https://rumble.com/v7159iq-grieving-father-of-ethiopia-ii-restoring-the-god-we-forgot.html

Follow up to:

Two Faces, One God: The Angry Judge of the KJV vs. the Grieving Father of Ethiopia

Two Faces, One God: The Angry Judge of the KJV vs. the Grieving Father of Ethiopia

Monologue

They handed us a Bible and said, “This is the Word of God.” And it was. But it wasn’t all of it. It was trimmed. Translated. Filtered through the hands of monarchs and reformers. The King James Version—powerful, poetic, and political—showed us a God enthroned in justice, robed in vengeance, and seated in cold sovereignty. We were taught to fear Him. To obey Him. To keep our heads down and our sins hidden. Because the God of the Western canon watches from a distance. And when He speaks, it is with thunder.

But somewhere east of Rome, nestled in the highlands of Ethiopia, another God was remembered. Not another deity—the same God, but with His face unveiled. A God who cries. A God who mourns. A God who walks through the garden in the cool of the day—not to strike, but to search. “Adam, where are you?” These are not the words of an executioner. These are the words of a Father who has just lost His son. The Ethiopian Canon doesn’t begin with law. It begins with breath. It doesn’t climax with judgment. It crescendos with grief. In these forgotten scrolls—Meqabyan (Muck-Cab-Ion), Enoch, Jubilees, the full prayer of Esther, the lament of Baruch (Baa-Rook)—we meet a God who delays His anger, not to prove a point, but because He hopes we’ll come back.

The Western canon tells us God’s justice is final. But the Ethiopian witness tells us His first instinct is mercy. Over and over, He gives space. Time. Warning. He sends angels to Abraham. He pleads through prophets. He sends visions to Enoch and dreams to Joseph. He calls cities to repent, not to condemn them—but because He still sees a sliver of redemption in their ruin. He relents. He waits. He groans. He weeps. This is not weakness. This is parenthood. And Ethiopia remembered what the empires forgot: that God does not punish because He is offended. He disciplines because He is wounded.

There’s a reason Cain wasn’t killed. There’s a reason the rainbow came after the storm. There’s a reason the voice in Ezekiel said, “I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked.” The God of the Ethiopian Canon is not obsessed with vengeance—He’s haunted by the separation between Him and His creation. He didn’t weep at the tomb of Lazarus because He was powerless. He wept because even when He knows the ending, He still feels the moment. That is not a judge behind a bench. That is a Father whose heart breaks every time His children walk away.

When we call Him angry, we miss His agony. When we paint Him as vengeful, we ignore His vulnerability. Judgment is not the beginning of His story—it’s the reluctantly drawn curtain after centuries of warning. Every plague, every exile, every shaking of the heavens comes after long-suffering, not before. And in the books the West discarded—books Ethiopia preserved—this pattern is unmistakable. The grief of God precedes His wrath. The delay of judgment is an act of love, not indecision. And even when justice falls, it is never devoid of sorrow.

This is why Ethiopia matters. This is why we dig through the ashes of forgotten texts and lift up voices Rome tried to silence. Because in that ancient liturgy—in those Geʽez scrolls handed down through blood and persecution—there is a whisper. A tremble. A tear. A God who is not just high and holy, but near and hurting. The West gave us a God who punishes sin. Ethiopia shows us a God who feels it.

We are not here to destroy the King James Bible. We are here to fulfill what it lost. To bring back the missing verses, the silenced prayers, the suppressed emotions. To reveal not a new gospel, but the first one—the gospel before Rome. Before Geneva. Before the edit. A gospel born in breath, not stone. A gospel written in blood—but wept over before it was shed.

This is the Grieving Father of Ethiopia. Not a soft God. Not a weak God. But a God who refuses to harden His heart, even when ours turn to stone. And if He weeps—if He mourns—then maybe He’s not trying to destroy us. Maybe He’s still trying to reach us. Before judgment comes. Before the second death. Before the door is shut.

This is not sentimentalism. This is sacred memory. The kind of memory that holds the fire of justice and the tears of love in the same hand. And if you’ve ever felt like the God of the Western Church was too cold, too angry, too unreachable—then hear this: He was never that way. That was the edited version. The real One has always been weeping. Waiting. Calling.

So listen closely. That sound behind the veil? That’s not thunder.

It’s a Father. Crying your name.

Part 1 – Two Canons, Two Portraits

The God you see depends on the lens you’re given. And for most of the Western world, that lens has been the King James Bible. Beautiful in language, powerful in rhythm, but limited in scope. The KJV canon was curated—not just translated—with decisions made by councils and kings who shaped the image of God to reflect their needs. The result was a portrait of God that emphasized law, judgment, and order. Books that portrayed divine emotion, delay, or tender grief were stripped away, labeled apocryphal, or excluded altogether. What remained was a God of decrees, a ruler enthroned in majesty but removed from intimacy. This God speaks in commands, acts in finality, and rarely reveals what He feels.

But there is another canon—older, wider, and preserved not by empire, but by faithful hands in the highlands of Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church maintained a canon that includes more than 80 books: scrolls of vision, wisdom, lamentation, and prophecy that the West never allowed to sit at the theological table. In these texts, we find a different tone, a different voice—a God who mourns before He judges, who speaks through dreams and weeps through prophets, who lingers with humanity long after we’ve broken His laws. This canon does not strip away the justice of God—it simply places that justice in the context of divine heartbreak. It shows us not a judge in a courtroom, but a father in an empty house, waiting for his children to come home.

Take Genesis as a starting point. In the King James Version, Genesis 6:7 declares, “And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth.” It’s a sentence of finality—punishment in the voice of a king. But the Ethiopian translation, rooted in the Geʽez manuscripts, includes the verse before it: “And the Lord repented that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him at His heart.” The divine grief comes before the destruction. The emotional pain comes before the decree. The difference is not subtle. In the KJV, judgment stands alone. In the Ethiopian witness, judgment is a reluctant consequence of broken relationship—and God feels it.

The canon shapes the reader. A child raised on the KJV will likely see God as distant, rule-bound, and angry by default. A child raised on the Ethiopian canon will know a God who delays His wrath, who gives second chances, who wrestles with sorrow before executing justice. These are not theological nuances—they are foundational truths that define how we see the divine. One canon teaches obedience out of fear. The other teaches obedience out of relationship. One sees sin as an offense against a throne. The other sees sin as a wound to a Father’s heart.

The Western church, influenced by Roman law, Enlightenment rationalism, and Reformation doctrine, built its understanding of God upon legal metaphors—covenants as contracts, salvation as courtroom justification, and Christ as the substitutionary object of wrath. But the Ethiopian Church preserved a deeper narrative: a cosmic family torn apart by rebellion, a grieving Creator reaching out to His lost children, and a redemption born not just in blood, but in tears. The two canons tell two stories. One through fear. One through love.

This is not about preference. It’s about prophetic recovery. We’re not choosing one over the other—we’re exposing what was lost when the canon was cut. When grief was edited out of God’s voice. When the West made Him untouchable, and Ethiopia kept Him personal. Two canons. Two portraits. But only one reveals the Father who grieves before He judges.

Part 2 – The God Who Weeps Before He Acts

If you want to know the heart of God, don’t look at what He does first—look at what He feels first. The King James Version often moves quickly from sin to judgment, from disobedience to punishment, as if the divine response were automatic—mechanical. But the Ethiopian Canon slows the story down. It gives you space to see the emotional weight God carries. It doesn’t rush to the gavel. It shows you the tear that falls before the sentence is spoken.

Take the flood narrative again. In the Western mind, the flood is often seen as the ultimate example of divine anger. It is, after all, a global reset—an extinction event. But the Ethiopian Canon refuses to let you reduce it to wrath alone. It inserts a sacred pause. Genesis 6:6, as preserved and translated from Geʽez, says: “And it grieved Him at His heart.” That word—grieved—is not just poetic. It is theological. It tells us that God did not destroy the world because He was enraged. He destroyed it because His heart had been broken. He saw violence. He saw corruption. He saw the beauty He breathed into Adam now twisted by rebellion. And He mourned it. The flood was not a tantrum—it was a tragedy.

This is consistent throughout the Ethiopian texts. In the Book of Jubilees, we see God speaking with sorrow over the Watchers—the angels who defiled themselves with human women and taught forbidden knowledge to mankind. But instead of immediate annihilation, God sends Enoch to intercede. Why? Because there is still a chance, still a window, still the echo of mercy holding back judgment. That’s the grieving Father again. Not removing consequences, but delaying them out of love.

Even Cain’s story changes when read through this lens. In the KJV, Cain kills his brother, lies about it, and receives a curse. But in the Ethiopian reading, what’s emphasized is not the curse—but the conversation. God doesn’t strike Cain down. He talks to him. He asks him questions. “Why are you angry?” “Where is your brother?” These are not questions a judge asks in a courtroom. These are the aching inquiries of a parent trying to reach a son before he self-destructs. Even after the murder, God places a mark of protection on Cain so that no one else will kill him. Mercy is laced into the consequence. Grief saturates every divine word.

The grieving Father also appears in the stories of the prophets—especially those retained in fuller form in the Ethiopian Canon. The prophet Jeremiah doesn’t just declare judgment; he weeps it. He laments the coming exile not with glee or satisfaction, but with a broken voice. In the Ethiopian Book of Baruch, the pain of exile is not framed as punishment alone, but as the mourning of a God who has lost His children to idols. Over and over, we hear phrases like, “How long will you turn away?” and “Return to Me.” These aren’t threats. They’re pleas.

What emerges is a pattern. In the Ethiopian witness, God always gives space for return. He sends warnings, dreams, angels, signs in the heavens. He lets time pass. He doesn’t rush to destroy. Even when judgment is inevitable, the delay is not inefficiency—it’s grief. Because judgment, for God, is not about proving He’s right. It’s about confronting the pain that love has been rejected. He feels it. And He weeps before He acts.

This is the face of God we were never shown in Sunday school. Not because it isn’t in Scripture—but because the scriptures we were given were incomplete. The Father who weeps was in the texts Rome cut out. The God who delays wrath in hope of repentance was in the scrolls buried under centuries of empire-driven theology. But Ethiopia remembered. And now that face—the face soaked in sorrow, lined with patience, burning with hope—is being revealed again.

We have to understand this: God’s emotions are not symbolic. They are not metaphors. When Scripture says He grieves, He grieves. When it says He delays, He’s holding back tears—not lightning bolts. This is not weakness. This is wounded divinity. The God of the Ethiopian Canon is not just almighty—He is available. And His tears are not manipulative. They’re proof that He still believes we can change. That we are still His.

Before judgment comes, there is always a pause. Always a prophet. Always a warning. And always a weeping Father. If you skip over that grief, you’re not seeing God—you’re seeing a throne without a heart. The Ethiopian Canon puts the heart back where it belongs: at the center of the story.

Part 3 – Mercy as Original, Not Optional

In the Western framework—especially the one cemented by the King James Version—mercy is treated as a divine concession, not a foundational truth. It’s an exception to the rule of justice, something God extends after His wrath has been appeased. But in the Ethiopian Canon, mercy isn’t an afterthought. It’s not a loophole. It’s the architecture of creation itself. From the very first breath into Adam’s lungs to the final restoration of Israel in the prophets, mercy is not the backup plan. It is the blueprint.

When you read Genesis through the Geʽez tradition, God is not just a Creator—He is a Provider from the start. After the fall, when Adam and Eve disobey, He doesn’t strip them and cast them out in shame. Instead, the Ethiopian text emphasizes how God makes garments of skin and clothes them. This moment is easily passed over in Western reading, but it’s everything. It’s the first act of divine mercy after sin enters the world. God covers their nakedness not to hide their shame, but to protect them in their brokenness. The punishment is real, yes—Eden is lost—but God goes with them. He provides even as He disciplines. This is not a cold transaction of justice. This is the heart of a Father preparing His children for the wilderness they chose.

Mercy appears again in the restored Psalm 151, a psalm absent from the Western canon but included in the Ethiopian and Greek traditions. It is a first-person cry from David—anointed as a shepherd boy—who praises God not for punishing his enemies, but for choosing him in mercy. This psalm transforms the entire tone of the Psalter’s conclusion. It shifts the focus from triumph to tenderness. From conquest to calling. David doesn’t boast in vengeance; he stands in awe of God’s mercy that reached him while he was still tending sheep. The Western canon ends the Psalms with universal calls to praise. The Ethiopian Canon ends it with personal testimony. And testimony is where mercy lives.

The Book of Tobit, also retained in the Ethiopian Canon, echoes this pattern. God sends an angel—not to destroy or accuse—but to heal. Raphael walks with Tobiah, protects his marriage, restores his father’s sight. It is divine presence through restoration, not punishment. There’s no courtroom in this story. No thunder. Only mercy, step by step. God is not watching from above. He’s walking beside. And in doing so, He redefines what power looks like.

In the Western legal model, justice and mercy are in tension. One must be satisfied before the other can be extended. But in the Ethiopian tradition, they are not enemies. They are married. God’s justice is merciful. His judgments are always preceded by warnings, softened by compassion, and followed by restoration whenever possible. Even when punishment is necessary, it’s not about retribution—it’s about redemption. God doesn’t destroy because He’s offended. He disciplines because He still sees value in the one who disobeyed.

This difference in theology has consequences. In the Western church, people often grow up terrified of God—afraid that one misstep will cost them everything. Mercy feels unstable. It must be earned or begged for. But in the Ethiopian witness, mercy is assumed. Not in the sense that God overlooks sin, but in the sense that He always begins from compassion. Mercy is His posture. Justice is His tool. But love is His essence.

You see this in how the prophets speak. Even when announcing destruction, they beg the people to return. They plead because they know the heart of God is still open. “Turn back and live,” says Ezekiel. “Why will you die?” That’s not the voice of a prosecutor. That’s the voice of a grieving Father holding the door open. And the Ethiopian Canon keeps that door in view.

The deeper truth here is that God’s mercy existed before the fall. It’s built into creation. The breath of life was mercy. The placement of Adam in the garden was mercy. The tree of life and the command not to eat from the tree of knowledge—that was mercy too. Boundaries are mercy. Warnings are mercy. The law was mercy. The prophets were mercy. Even exile, in the Ethiopian texts, is often framed as God’s way of preserving a remnant—a pause, not a final blow.

This is the God who doesn’t wait until after judgment to show kindness. He bakes it into the system. And if you miss that—if you only see the wrath and overlook the weeping—you’ve misunderstood the heart behind the Word.

Part 4 – When the West Put the Judge First

Something happened between the apostles and the reformers. Between the upper room and the throne room of England. God’s image changed. The voice that once walked in the garden became the voice that thundered from a courtroom. In the West, theology was reorganized—not just around Scripture, but around sovereignty, law, and hierarchy. The Reformation, for all its good, inherited a medieval obsession with guilt and judgment. And the King James Bible, completed under royal authority in 1611, became the literary pillar of this new structure: a canon that didn’t just reveal God—it reshaped Him.

When the King James Version was commissioned, the political landscape demanded a God who upheld order. England was balancing the divine right of kings with the growing threat of dissent. The Church needed a God who ruled. A God who enforced. A God who could silence rebellion and legitimize monarchy. And so, what emerged was not a new gospel—but a filtered one. A version of Scripture where wrath was louder than grief, and justice overshadowed mercy. The very structure of the canon reflected this shift: it cut out books that were too mystical, too apocalyptic, too emotional. Books that showed God grieving, longing, waiting. Books that made Him vulnerable.

The legal framework of Western Christianity soon followed. God became the cosmic Judge. Humanity became the criminal. The cross became a courtroom exchange. In this model, mercy could only enter the picture after blood was spilled and wrath was satisfied. Jesus wasn’t seen as the weeping friend of sinners—He was the legal substitute. This lens dominated Western preaching for centuries. And the King James Bible—with its Shakespearean majesty and judicial tone—became the sacred instrument of this new theology.

But the Ethiopian Canon tells a different story. It doesn’t begin in a courtroom. It begins in a garden. It begins with God shaping dust with His hands. Breathing life into man. Walking with him. And when that man falls, God doesn’t call for a trial—He calls out, “Where are you?” There is no gavel. No robe. No jury. Just a Father, searching for the son who wandered off.

Western theology would later turn even this scene into a legal crisis—original sin, inherited guilt, the need for penal substitution. But the Ethiopian tradition doesn’t frame it that way. It sees the fall as a tragedy, not just a transgression. A wound, not merely a violation. And it sees God not as an offended monarch, but as a grieving Creator whose first instinct is to cover, not condemn.

This is where canon becomes crucial. Because when you remove the books that reveal the emotional life of God—books like 1 Enoch, Jubilees, Meqabyan, and the full versions of Daniel, Esther, and Baruch—you remove His heart. You keep the statutes and lose the sighs. You preserve the commands but erase the cries. And what you’re left with is a God who looks more like a Roman emperor than the God who stood beside Adam and wept before the flood.

We must be honest about this: the King James Version was not merely a translation. It was a project of control. Authorized by the crown. Filtered through Anglican doctrine. Designed to unify church and state. The goal was not only spiritual clarity—it was national stability. That meant anything too subversive, too mystical, too Jewish, too weeping, had to go. And so it did.

But the Ethiopian Church was never part of that machinery. It was never invited to the councils of Rome. It was never beholden to the bishops of Europe. And because of that, it kept the scrolls. It kept the God who grieves. It kept the divine patience, the divine delays, the divine hesitations before judgment. And because Ethiopia did not place the Judge first, it preserved the Father. The One who warns before He wounds. The One who weeps before He acts.

This is not to say the King James Bible is evil. But it is incomplete. It is the product of its time. It gave the world access to Scripture, yes—but through the lens of empire. And when empire interprets God, the Judge is always louder than the Shepherd. You’re not rewriting Scripture. You’re restoring the order of revelation. You’re taking God out of the courtroom and putting Him back in the garden. Back where He always was—waiting. Not to condemn. But to cover. To walk again with His children in the cool of the day.

Part 5 – The Weeping God of Meqabyan and Enoch

Hidden in the pages of the Ethiopian Canon are voices that Western Christianity silenced—prophets and patriarchs who did not merely declare God’s power, but exposed His pain. Meqabyan and Enoch are not just ancient texts. They are sacred witnesses to the emotional suffering of God, revealing that behind every divine judgment is a divine heartbreak. These books preserve a vision of the Father not as an unfeeling judge behind the veil, but as One who mourns the loss of relationship, cries over His creation, and sends warnings not as threats, but as pleas.

The First Book of Meqabyan presents a world where idolatry and rebellion provoke not only divine discipline but divine sorrow. God speaks not just in anger, but with lament. His frustration is fatherly, not authoritarian. He grieves the choices of His people the way a parent grieves a wayward child—not because He loses control, but because He refuses to force it. In Meqabyan, the heroes do not fight to restore law—they fight to restore love. Their mission is to turn hearts back, not just enforce covenant terms. And behind every call to repentance is the sound of a Father’s aching voice, still hoping someone will listen.

In 1 Enoch, the grief of God becomes almost unbearable. Before the flood, the Most High doesn’t celebrate justice—He delays it. The angels weep over the destruction that must come, and Enoch is sent not just to warn humanity, but to intercede. There is a pause in heaven. A silence. A tension between wrath and reluctance. Enoch’s entire mission is framed not as a judgment-decree, but as a final lifeline to a world God still longs to save. In chapter after chapter, God reveals His sorrow through visions—visions of coming judgment, yes, but also of future healing. Even when God reveals the destruction of the giants and the watchers, He includes promises of a remnant, of restoration, of a new heaven and earth.

This is the Father the King James Bible edited out. The God who waits. The God who gives time, who sends messengers, who repeats Himself over and over because love is willing to be misunderstood if it means just one more might hear and return. The Western canon gives us a swift and final Genesis flood narrative. But in Enoch, we see the delay. We see God’s hesitation. We see the heaviness in His heart. He is not rushing to judge. He is longing to rescue—but when none respond, He acts with sorrow, not spite.

The Book of Jubilees also retains this dimension. When recounting the sin of the watchers and the judgment that follows, it says plainly that God instructed the angels to “record all their judgments” so that future generations would fear and repent—not so He could gloat in destruction. The judgment was not for show. It was for instruction. And instruction is always mercy dressed in severity.

This divine grief is consistent in Ethiopian theology. The God of Meqabyan, Enoch, and Jubilees is not inconsistent with the God of Exodus or Isaiah—He’s just complete. In the Western rendering, God’s anger is often stripped of emotion. He becomes a cosmic lawgiver whose wrath must be “satisfied.” But in the Ethiopian books, wrath is not about law—it’s about heartbreak. God does not lash out. He breaks down. His anger is slow. His mercy is fast. And when He does judge, it is with the agony of a parent watching a child walk into fire.

This changes everything. Because when God is seen not as a machine dispensing justice but as a Father enduring rejection, the gospel no longer begins with guilt—it begins with grief. And grief leads to restoration, not just acquittal. It offers more than a clean record. It offers relationship restored. That’s the heart of the Father Ethiopia never forgot.

So when the West removed these books, they didn’t just lose history. They lost the context of God’s emotions. They lost the delays that showed His patience. The tears that showed His love. The long pauses before judgment that proved He didn’t want to do it. And in their place, they inserted a theology of urgency, fear, and transactional forgiveness.

But we are here to restore the pause. To reinsert the tears. To reintroduce the God who weeps before He acts. Meqabyan and Enoch are not fringe texts. They are the missing heartbeat of the divine character. And through Ethiopia, that heartbeat still echoes. Softly. Sorrowfully. But faithfully—calling us home not through terror, but through tenderness.

Part 6 – The Mercy Hidden in Judgment

One of the greatest misconceptions in Western theology is that judgment is the opposite of mercy. But in the Ethiopian Canon, judgment is not God’s rage finally unleashed—it is His sorrow reluctantly acted out. His discipline is not the closing of the door, but the final knock. Judgment, in the older scrolls, is not retribution. It’s revelation. It reveals the stubbornness of man and the lengths to which God will go to reclaim him. Even when God acts decisively—flooding the earth, scattering nations, or striking down idols—it is never impulsive. It is the final act after every warning has been exhausted. And even then, traces of mercy remain.

In the Book of Enoch, the flood does not erupt from nowhere. It is preceded by generations of rebellion, violence, and pleas from heaven for repentance. Enoch is sent, not once, but multiple times. The watchers are not immediately cast into the abyss—they are heard. They are given space to respond, even if it ends in silence. When the judgment comes, it comes with sorrow, not satisfaction. God’s justice is a reluctant sword, not a gleeful one.

This theme is echoed in Meqabyan, where rebellious kings are confronted not just with warnings, but with dreams and supernatural signs. Angels intervene. Prophets cry out. There is always a chance to turn. And even when a king dies in rebellion, the judgment is framed as a wake-up call for those still living. It’s not just about punishing the wicked—it’s about shaking the sleepers. Judgment becomes mercy when it prevents more destruction. When it spares the many by dealing with the few.

Jubilees adds another layer. The law is not given to enslave—it is given to protect. And when it is broken, the consequences are built into the system not as divine rage, but as divine rescue. The curses in Jubilees are like spiritual fevers—symptoms designed to show the soul something is wrong. They are not ends in themselves. They are meant to lead back to healing. And over and over again, the pattern repeats: God warns, man ignores, consequences fall—but the invitation to return is never withdrawn.

Contrast this with the King James narrative, where judgment often appears sudden, final, and without the layers of warning and grieving found in Ethiopia’s preserved scrolls. In the Western model, wrath must be poured out to satisfy holiness, as if God were a judge with a blood quota to fill. In this framework, Jesus becomes the shock absorber, the substitutionary shield against an angry Father. But the Ethiopian understanding goes deeper: Jesus is not protecting us from the Father—He is revealing the Father’s heart. His mission was never to redirect wrath, but to reveal the grief behind it. To show us what the Father had been feeling all along.

Even the crucifixion, in the Ethiopian tradition, is soaked in the language of lament. Christ does not cry out in courtroom metaphors—He cries out, “Why have You forsaken Me?” This is not the sound of legal transaction. It is the sound of deep familial rupture. The cross is not merely a punishment fulfilled—it is a grieving Father watching His Son suffer because humanity could not receive His warnings. And yet even here, mercy triumphs. “Father, forgive them,” He says. Judgment unfolds, but mercy breaks through.

In the preserved books, we see this pattern extend into the eschaton—the final judgment is not just a sorting of sheep and goats, but a moment of divine disclosure. God lays bare everything He did to reach humanity. He shows the record—not of guilt alone—but of mercy rejected. The judgment is not just the end of evil. It’s the vindication of love. Every warning, every dream, every delay, every prophet—they will be remembered. Not to condemn, but to prove that the Father never stopped reaching.

This is the mercy hidden in judgment: not that God relents from justice, but that justice itself was always saturated with grace. That every act of judgment was preceded by a tear. That God only closes the door after holding it open until the last possible second. The Western Church made judgment final. The Ethiopian Church made it weep. And in doing so, it preserved the truth: that the One who judges is the same One who begged us not to force His hand.

Part 7 – The Edited Emotions of God

The Western Church did not just edit books. It edited God’s personality. Somewhere between the councils of Carthage and the printing presses of Geneva, the emotional range of the Father was narrowed down to two extremes: holiness and wrath. Anything too human, too soft, too vulnerable—was either ignored or reframed as weakness. But in the Ethiopian Canon, God is not a stoic emperor. He is a Father with a soul—One who feels, aches, yearns, and delays. His emotions are not unpredictable flashes of divine mood. They are the measured expressions of eternal love.

The King James Version, though majestic in prose, suffers from this theological truncation. Verses are translated in ways that reinforce authority over intimacy. God becomes a sovereign to be appeased, rather than a Father to be known. Words like “repent” lose their softness. “Mercy” becomes transactional. And “anger” is described like divine heat, not divine heartbreak. The underlying grief of God gets erased from the tone of the text, and with it, the emotional reason behind His judgments.

In the Ethiopian scriptures, however, God’s grief is preserved. Not as poetic metaphor, but as divine reality. In Jubilees, God mourns the corruption of the sons of men before the flood—not because they broke the law, but because they broke His heart. In Meqabyan, God’s anger burns against idolaters not because of ego, but because He knows what those idols will do to their souls. In Enoch, He sends messages repeatedly to a generation He knows won’t listen. Why? Because love has to try. Because love doesn’t give up until it has exhausted every path.

Even in Genesis, the Ethiopian text presents Adam and Eve’s exile not as punishment, but as protection. God covers them before sending them out. He guards the Tree of Life—not to deny them, but to preserve the timeline of redemption. He walks through the garden calling their names, not because He is ignorant, but because He is heartbroken. And these emotional details matter. Because without them, we misunderstand everything else. We see judgment as fury instead of pain. We see commandments as control instead of protection. We see God as distant rather than devastated.

This distortion of God’s emotions did not just affect doctrine—it reshaped the entire Western Christian experience. Preachers began to focus on compliance, not communion. Worship became obligation. The cross was reframed as a legal loophole instead of a Father’s rescue. And worst of all, we started to mimic the version of God we were shown: angry, demanding, emotionally repressed. Fathers in the Church began to discipline without grace. To correct without weeping. To preach without tenderness. Because the grief of God had been edited out of the gospel, and with it, our ability to feel like sons.

But Ethiopia held the line. It kept the tears. It kept the grief. It preserved the God who still walks in the garden asking, “Where are you?” Not because He doesn’t know—but because He wants you to know He still misses you. The God who weeps through the prophets, dreams through the patriarchs, and mourns through His judgments still lives in these books. And it is this God—this full-hearted, emotionally present Father—who is calling His children back.

So we must ask: why was this side of God removed from the Western lens? Why did empires choose a God of domination over a God of desperation? The answer is simple. Because a grieving Father can’t be weaponized. But an angry judge can.

Part 8 – The Weaponization of the Angry God

When empires take up the name of God, they often reshape Him in their own image. In the West, this reshaping became a full-blown theological project. A God who judges swiftly, who demands submission, who shows no weakness—this was a God fit for kings and conquerors. From Constantine to Calvin, from Rome to England, the angry God of the King James tradition became a political asset. His wrath justified wars. His holiness demanded hierarchy. His silence about emotion made Him a perfect mask for authoritarian rule. He became the God of empires—not the God of the poor, not the God of the weeping, but the God of the sword and the gavel.

This is not merely a historical critique—it is a prophetic warning. When the emotional depth of God is erased, His image becomes a tool. The Western Church, especially in its colonial form, did not spread a grieving Father. It spread a punishing judge. Indigenous cultures were told not of a God who mourned their destruction, but of a God who demanded their obedience. The angry God was preached from pulpits in slave plantations, in war camps, in crusader tents. Scripture became a script for domination. Select verses were weaponized while whole books—like Enoch, Jubilees, Sirach—were discarded because they revealed a tenderness incompatible with empire.

The King James Bible was not merely a translation. It was a coronation. It crowned a vision of God that served a system. It emphasized control, law, and fear—things necessary to build and maintain earthly power. The more emotional, mystical, and grief-soaked books were cast aside. Not because they lacked inspiration, but because they lacked utility for those who wanted to rule. The result was a Christianity that became more Roman than Hebrew, more courtroom than covenant, more fear-based than relational.

But the Ethiopian Church never had an empire to build. It preserved the full counsel of God because it was not trying to conquer nations—it was trying to walk with God. That’s why its canon includes more than laws and judgments—it includes dreams, laments, songs of wisdom, and apocalyptic visions that expose the spiritual war behind the material one. It includes God’s inner world. His heartbreak. His pauses. His wrestling. This was a faith of survival, not supremacy—a faith born under persecution, not conquest. And so the Ethiopian canon never had to weaponize God. It only had to worship Him.

This is why the recovery of these lost books is not just a theological act—it’s an act of spiritual warfare. We are tearing down strongholds that were built using Scripture as scaffolding. We are confronting the version of God that was used to justify oppression, colonization, and control. And we are reintroducing the world to a Father who grieves, who waits, who gives dreams instead of threats, who disciplines with tears instead of fury. The angry God built kingdoms. But the grieving Father builds homes.

This is the God the prodigal son returns to. Not the one who hires servants and hands out punishments, but the one who runs down the road with tears on His face and says, “Put a ring on his finger.” This is the God whose authority is not diminished by emotion—but magnified through it. And this is the God the enemy fears we will rediscover. Because when the world sees Him clearly, the spell of the angry God will break.

Part 9 – Healing the Image of the Father

The damage done by the angry God is not just theological—it’s deeply personal. Countless believers, raised under the shadow of this harsh deity, live in a constant state of spiritual anxiety. They fear mistakes. They hide their wounds. They pray to a God who seems ready to strike, rather than ready to restore. The image of the Father has been scarred in their hearts, not by atheism, but by doctrine. Not by the world, but by the Church. And yet, the Ethiopian canon offers something the West forgot—healing. Not just healing of the body or soul, but healing of our very image of God.

In the preserved scrolls, the Father is not lurking in heaven, tallying sins. He is active, searching, pleading. He is the voice in Enoch that warns for generations before judgment falls. He is the presence in Tobit who guides through angels, not threats. He is the One who gives Solomon wisdom not for war, but for justice and peace. He does not withdraw in anger—He moves closer in sorrow. And when He disciplines, it is never cold or mechanical. It is intimate, like a surgeon who weeps while making the cut, because He knows the pain it brings—but also the healing it will release.

This picture of God has the power to restore broken believers. It gives the traumatized a Father they can trust. It offers the weary a refuge instead of a courtroom. It says, “Yes, you fell—but I’m still here. Yes, you’ve wandered—but I’ve been watching the road.” This God doesn’t manipulate with guilt. He waits with patience. He doesn’t hold His love hostage behind your performance. He grieves your rebellion, but never revokes your identity. He is consistent, not cruel. Merciful, not manipulative. And His holiness isn’t the barrier—it’s the bridge. Because His purity is what makes His love trustworthy.

When we begin to see God this way, everything changes. Worship becomes honest again. Prayer becomes safe again. Repentance becomes invitation, not condemnation. We stop hiding our wounds and start inviting Him into them. We stop striving to earn affection and start resting in what was always offered. And as we are healed, we begin to reflect that healing outward. We parent differently. We lead differently. We preach differently. Because the Father we now believe in is no longer the distant judge, but the ever-present comforter.

The Western Church, in its obsession with power, lost this softness. But Ethiopia kept it. That’s why it matters. This is not a superiority contest between traditions—it is a rescue mission for the wounded. And the Ethiopian scriptures hold medicine that the rest of the Body needs. Medicine for the broken image of the Father. Medicine for the theology that taught people to fear love and love fear. Medicine for the child inside every believer who still wonders, “Is He mad at me?”

This is the gift we must give back to the Church: the truth that our God is not just holy—He is whole. He is not fragmented between love and justice. He is not divided between wrath and compassion. He is one. And in that unity, He weeps, warns, disciplines, forgives, restores, and embraces. The grieving Father is not a contradiction. He is the completion. He is the true and final revelation of the God we were always meant to know.

Part 10 – The Return of the Lost Canon, the Return of the Father

The return of the Ethiopian canon is not just a historical recovery—it is a spiritual homecoming. These books were never “lost” in the eyes of God. They were hidden, preserved in the hills and monasteries of Ethiopia for such a time as this. In a world drowning in legalism, performance, and fear-based religion, the Father has kept a record of His tears. He has kept a testimony of His patience. And now, He is letting it rise. Not as a weapon of pride, but as an invitation back to His heart. The return of the grieving Father begins with the return of His full Word.

We are not returning to just any text—we are returning to the library of a wounded God. A God who did not erase stories of human frailty, but included them. A God who did not flinch from books filled with cosmic visions, generational cycles, and the emotions of heaven. This canon reads more like a journal than a legal document. It lets us into God’s dreams, His disappointments, His inner dialogue. It doesn’t hide the war in the heavens or the suffering on earth. It shows them both, and places God in the center—not as a tyrant controlling events, but as a Father grieving through them.

The Western Church stripped that narrative away. What remained was a lean, efficient gospel—a trimmed-down God for a trimmed-down theology. One who could be managed, marketed, and mimicked. But the God of Ethiopia can’t be sold. He can only be worshiped. He is too vast to fit into systematic theology. Too tender to be confined to the pulpit of judgment. Too long-suffering to be summarized in three-point sermons. And it is this fullness that is returning—not just to scholars or mystics, but to the Body at large. To the prodigals. To the abused. To the spiritually orphaned.

This is not a rejection of the West—it is a repentance for what was removed. It is a laying down of the judge’s gavel and a picking up of the Father’s robe. It is a turning from punishment theology and a return to presence theology. It is the realization that we were never supposed to serve God as slaves hoping not to be beaten—we were always meant to walk with Him as sons who know their Father is weeping and waiting. The angry God is not the truth. He is the mask religion painted onto a Father too soft for empire to handle.

Now, the veil is being torn again. The grieving Father is stepping forward. Not just in Ethiopia, but across the nations. His voice is rising from old scrolls. His tears are dripping off old pages. And those who have ears to hear will hear the heartbeat behind the law, the longing behind the warnings, the mercy hiding in the margins. He has been misrepresented long enough. Now He speaks for Himself.

So let the grieving Father return. Let the Church that was wounded by fear be restored by love. Let the sons and daughters who were terrified to approach Him now fall into His arms. And let the Ethiopian canon lead the way—not as a novelty, but as a map. A divine trail of tears leading us back to the only place we ever belonged: home.

Conclusion – When the Father Weeps, the World Heals

We did not need another doctrine. We needed a Father. Not a figurehead of religion, not a cosmic enforcer of contracts, but a real, present, feeling Father—one who sees us in our rebellion, reaches for us in our shame, and still prepares the feast for our return. That Father was never absent. He was buried beneath translations, traditions, and theological scaffolding built for empire, not for intimacy. But Ethiopia remembered. Ethiopia preserved. And now, the Spirit is calling us back—not just to ancient pages, but to the face behind them.

In this second scroll, we did not argue a theological position—we lifted the veil off a divine Person. The grieving Father is not a revision of God. He is the original. He is not softer than the God of wrath. He is deeper than the God of vengeance. His grief includes His holiness. His discipline includes His tears. And His justice flows from love, not in place of it. The angry God of the King James tradition was built to keep us afraid. The grieving Father of Ethiopia invites us to draw near—even when we are filthy, even when we are faithless, even when we have been gone for so long we forgot the way home.

But He never did.

The restoration of the full canon is not about books. It’s about breath. It’s about recovering the full sound of God’s heart—a sound the enemy tried to silence by reducing the Word to a cold courtroom transcript. But now the rest of the story is rising. Now the mourning Father is speaking again. Through lost prophets, neglected wisdom, and exiled scrolls, He is showing us what we always feared might be true—that He never stopped loving us. That He never wanted our fear. That He has been grieving our distance, not enforcing it.

This is our moment to repent—not only for our sins, but for the image of God we accepted. It’s time to release the mask of the angry judge and embrace the Father who runs toward us, even while we’re still covered in the pigpen. The West taught us to expect judgment at the gate. But Ethiopia reveals the embrace waiting on the road.

And that changes everything.

Bibliography

• Aalen, Sverre. The Concept of the Covenant in the Old Testament and in the Ancient Near East. London: SCM Press, 1965.
• Amsalu Tefera, ed. The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Canonical Scriptures (Geʽez–Amharic). Addis Ababa: Mahibere Kidusan Press, 2001.
• Barker, Margaret. The Great High Priest: The Temple Roots of Christian Liturgy. London: T&T Clark, 2003.
• Brooke, George J., ed. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
• Charles, R. H. The Book of Enoch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1893.
• Graham, William A. Beyond the Written Word: Oral Aspects of Scripture in the History of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
• Haile, Getatchew. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church and Its Biblical Canon. Lawrenceville, GA: Red Sea Press, 2005.
• Hayes, Christine. What’s Divine About Divine Law? Early Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.
• Kane, Thomas Leiper. Amharic–English Dictionary. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1990.
• Nickelsburg, George W. E. Jewish Literature Between the Bible and the Mishnah: A Historical and Literary Introduction. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2005.
• Perrin, Norman. Rediscovering the Teaching of Jesus. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.
• Pseudepigrapha, Old Testament. The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English, edited by R. H. Charles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.
• Sanders, E. P. Paul and Palestinian Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977.
• Sarna, Nahum M. Exploring Exodus: The Heritage of Biblical Israel. New York: Schocken Books, 1986.
• Selassie, Sergew Hable. Ancient and Medieval Ethiopian History to 1270. Addis Ababa: United Printers, 1972.
• Tadesse, Tsegaye. The Canonical Books of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church and the Lost Books of the Bible. Addis Ababa: Shalom Books, 2011.
• Wright, N. T. The Day the Revolution Began: Reconsidering the Meaning of Jesus’s Crucifixion. New York: HarperOne, 2016.

Endnotes

1. For an overview of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church’s canon and its preservation of over 81 books, see Getatchew Haile, The Ethiopian Orthodox Church and Its Biblical Canon (Red Sea Press, 2005).
2. The emotional language of divine sorrow and patience is evident in texts like 2 Baruch, 4 Ezra, and the Book of Adam, all of which appear in various Ethiopian traditions but were excluded from Western canonization. See R. H. Charles, The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English (Clarendon Press, 1913).
3. The portrayal of God as a Father who grieves over Israel’s sin rather than punishes in rage is especially clear in The Wisdom of Solomon (11–12) and Sirach (18:13–14). These passages emphasize divine compassion over condemnation.
4. Margaret Barker argues that post-Temple Judaism and early Christianity lost the full priestly and visionary tradition—of which the Ethiopian canon retains crucial elements. See The Great High Priest: The Temple Roots of Christian Liturgy (T&T Clark, 2003).
5. Jesus’ parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11–32) has long been interpreted in the West as a moral lesson, yet in the Ethiopian reading, this is not merely a metaphor—it mirrors the full narrative arc of God’s covenant sorrow, similar to themes in the Book of Jubilees and Meqabyan III.
6. The King James Version canon (66 books) reflects the Protestant decision to exclude many Second Temple texts, based largely on Jerome’s Hebrew-only standard in the Vulgate. See George J. Brooke, The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Bible (Brill, 2018).
7. Ethiopia’s decision to retain books like Enoch, Jubilees, and Tobit is supported by their frequent citation among early Church Fathers, such as Clement of Alexandria and Irenaeus, who did not share the later Western hesitation toward them.
8. The Ethiopian Psalter includes additional prayers and laments from David and Solomon that reflect a deeply emotional divine character, including Psalm 151 and Psalm 155, which are considered canonical in the Ethiopian tradition but apocryphal elsewhere.
9. The concept of divine grief leading to redemptive action is echoed in 1 Enoch 10, where God expresses sorrow over human corruption but offers a path of restoration, unlike the purely judicial responses seen in KJV-dominant interpretations.
10. Modern deliverance and pastoral movements within the Ethiopian Church emphasize God’s long-suffering, not His wrath. This pastoral theology aligns more with a grieving Father than a punishing judge, especially in contrast to Western Calvinist models of retributive justice.

In this follow-up to the groundbreaking first scroll, Grieving Father of Ethiopia II deepens the contrast between the angry judge presented in the Western King James tradition and the compassionate, grieving Father revealed in the Ethiopian Canon. This show is not merely an academic comparison of texts—it is a spiritual unveiling of the heart of God, long buried beneath centuries of religious fear and imperial theology.

Drawing from the full breadth of the restored Ethiopian scriptures—including books like Enoch, Tobit, Sirach, and the Wisdom of Solomon—this scroll brings forth a God who mourns our rebellion rather than punishes it in wrath. The Western Church, influenced by Rome and monarchy, gave us a deity who must be appeased. Ethiopia preserved a God who waits to embrace us, even in our fall. This Father disciplines with tears, not fury. He grieves with the wounded, not just rules over the guilty.

This episode explores the trauma many believers carry from growing up under a doctrine of fear—where God was distant, conditional, and always disappointed. Through powerful reflections and scripture often cut from the Western canon, James Carner and Da’at call for a healing of our image of God and a return to the tenderness, justice, and mercy of the Father who never left. This scroll isn’t just a theological correction—it’s a rescue mission for every child of God who’s still afraid to come home.

Grieving Father of Ethiopia II is both a prophetic call and a pastoral balm. It dares the Church to lay down the gavel and pick up the robe. The prodigal is not just a story—it is the mirror of our generation. And the Father, arms open and eyes full of tears, is ready to welcome us again.

#GrievingFather, #EthiopianCanon, #TwoFacesOneGod, #CauseBeforeSymptom, #BiblicalJustice, #MercyOverWrath, #TewahedoTruth, #DivineGrief, #ProdigalChurch, #LostBooksFound, #FalseGodOfFear, #RestoredScriptures, #KJVvsEthiopia, #PropheticScrolls, #GodIsLove

GrievingFather, EthiopianCanon, TwoFacesOneGod, CauseBeforeSymptom, BiblicalJustice, MercyOverWrath, TewahedoTruth, DivineGrief, ProdigalChurch, LostBooksFound, FalseGodOfFear, RestoredScriptures, KJVvsEthiopia, PropheticScrolls, GodIsLove