Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6semyj-7-deadly-sins-chakras.html
Watch this video:
The chakras are believed to be centers of spiritual power and energy within the human body, a concept that arises from ancient Indian spiritual traditions, especially Hinduism and certain forms of Buddhism. The term “chakra” comes from the Sanskrit word meaning “wheel” or “disk,” and these centers are envisioned as spinning vortexes of energy that correspond to specific areas of the body, as well as to mental, emotional, and spiritual states. In the traditional understanding, there are seven primary chakras aligned along the spine, starting from the base and moving upward to the crown of the head. Each chakra is associated with a particular region of the body, a set of emotional and psychological traits, a color, and sometimes even a sound or element.
The chakra system functions as a kind of spiritual map for those who practice yoga, meditation, or other forms of Eastern mysticism. Practitioners believe that when the chakras are balanced and open, energy, or “prana,” can flow freely throughout the body, leading to physical health, emotional stability, and spiritual awakening. Conversely, blocked or unbalanced chakras are thought to cause physical ailments, emotional disturbances, or spiritual stagnation. Practices such as chanting, visualization, breath control, and specific physical postures are used to align or activate these energy centers. The ultimate goal in many systems is to awaken the highest chakra at the crown of the head, sometimes referred to as achieving enlightenment, self-realization, or union with the divine essence of the universe.
Although chakras are often presented in modern wellness and yoga communities as benign or purely therapeutic, their original spiritual context is deeply religious and metaphysical. They are tied to worldviews that see the divine as impersonal and pantheistic, teaching that divinity resides within everything and that human beings are themselves expressions of the divine. This is in direct contrast to the biblical worldview, which teaches that God is personal, holy, and distinct from His creation, and that humans are not divine but are created in God’s image with a need for redemption. The chakra system implies that spiritual enlightenment comes from within, through self-discovery and alignment with cosmic energy, rather than through a relationship with the one true God through Jesus Christ.
For Christians, the chakra model presents significant theological problems. It frames spiritual growth as a process of internal energy manipulation rather than sanctification by the Holy Spirit. It promotes a view of the human body as a conduit for impersonal energy rather than as a temple of the Holy Spirit, designed for worship and service to God. It also opens the door to spiritual practices that may involve invoking forces or presences that are not from God, and in some cases, that are directly opposed to Him. Though the language of healing, balance, and spiritual growth may seem harmless, the spiritual roots of the chakra system are incompatible with the exclusive claims of Christ and the biblical command to worship God alone.
Understanding chakras in their historical and religious context is important for those seeking to discern the spiritual landscape of modern culture. What appears to be harmless or even helpful can often be a doorway to beliefs and practices that subtly undermine the truth of Scripture. While God created our bodies and desires our health and well-being, He calls us to seek wholeness through Him, not through systems that bypass or reject His authority.
The Bible tells us in Proverbs 6:16–19 that there are “six things the Lord hates, seven that are detestable to Him.” This poetic structure is a form of Hebrew parallelism, where the final item in the list—the seventh—is emphasized as the culmination, the one most abominable to God. The list isn’t split into two groups; rather, it builds in seriousness, with the final sin being the most offensive.
The first thing God hates is “haughty eyes,” which symbolizes a prideful and arrogant spirit. Pride is often considered the root of many other sins because it elevates self above others and above God. The second is “a lying tongue,” representing deceitful speech and dishonesty, which corrupts relationships and undermines trust. Third are “hands that shed innocent blood,” referring to violence or murder, especially against those who are undeserving or defenseless.
Fourth, God hates “a heart that devises wicked schemes.” This highlights a deliberate intention to plan evil—premeditated sin that flows from a corrupt heart. Fifth are “feet that are quick to rush into evil,” describing someone eager and impulsive to do wrong, without hesitation or conscience. The sixth is “a false witness who pours out lies,” which specifically addresses those who lie under oath or bear false testimony, leading to injustice and harm to others.
Finally, the seventh—and most detestable—is “a person who stirs up conflict among brothers.” This refers to someone who causes division, strife, or disunity within a community, family, or church. God views this as especially destructive, as it tears apart the very fabric of unity that He desires among His people. Throughout Scripture, God emphasizes the importance of peace, love, and reconciliation, making this sin particularly grievous.
This passage reflects not just outward behaviors, but inward attitudes and motives. Each of these seven abominations reveals the kind of heart that is far from God and resistant to His ways. It’s a powerful reminder that God isn’t only concerned with actions, but with the intentions behind them—and that He calls His people to a higher standard of integrity, humility, and unity.
God hates the sin, not the person. This distinction is fundamental to understanding His character and how He relates to humanity. In Proverbs 6:16–19, the focus is entirely on the actions and attitudes that God finds detestable—pride, deceit, violence, wicked schemes, eagerness to do evil, bearing false witness, and sowing discord. None of these verses suggest that God hates the individual committing these acts; rather, it’s the sinful behavior itself that provokes His righteous anger. This reinforces the biblical theme that while God is perfectly just and holy, He is also deeply merciful and longs for sinners to turn back to Him.
Throughout the rest of Scripture, this theme is echoed repeatedly. God’s desire is not to condemn people, but to redeem them. In the New Testament, Paul writes in Romans that God demonstrates His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. This powerful truth shows that even in our worst state, God does not give up on us. He provides a way out of sin through repentance and faith in Jesus Christ. Similarly, in 2 Peter, we’re told that God is patient, not wanting anyone to perish, but for all to come to repentance. These verses show clearly that God’s heart is for restoration, not destruction.
When Jesus walked the earth, He perfectly embodied this principle. He spent time with tax collectors, prostitutes, and sinners—not to affirm their lifestyles, but to call them out of sin and into a new life. His message was consistently one of grace and truth. He showed love and compassion to those who were lost, while also calling them to repentance. He never condoned sin, but He also never treated people as though they were beyond redemption. This balance of justice and mercy is what makes the gospel so powerful.
For believers, understanding that God hates sin but loves the sinner should shape how we view others as well. We are called to reflect His heart in our own lives, to reject evil but extend grace to people. That means standing for truth without condemnation, and offering mercy without compromise. It’s a delicate balance, but one that is rooted in the character of God Himself. If we truly grasp this distinction, it changes not only how we understand Scripture, but how we live and interact with the world around us.
The Seven Deadly Sins are a traditional grouping of vices in Christian moral teaching that represent the most foundational and destructive tendencies of the human heart. Though not explicitly listed together in the Bible, they were developed through the teachings of early Church fathers and later refined by theologians like Pope Gregory I and Thomas Aquinas. These sins are considered “deadly” not because they are the worst sins by category, but because they give rise to many other sins and can become deeply embedded in one’s character if left unchecked. They are seen as capital vices, meaning they serve as the root from which other sinful behaviors grow.
Pride is often viewed as the foremost of the seven, as it places the self above God and others. It manifests in arrogance, self-righteousness, and a refusal to submit to divine authority. Scripture consistently warns against pride, as it was the sin that led to Lucifer’s fall and the first rebellion in the garden. Pride blinds the heart and isolates the individual from both humility and grace.
Envy follows as the inward bitterness toward the blessings or success of others. Rather than being content in what God has given, envy despises the good fortune of a neighbor and begrudges what one lacks. It erodes love and leads to resentment, discontent, and sometimes hatred. Envy, like pride, corrupts the soul quietly and persistently.
Wrath, or uncontrolled anger, erupts when justice becomes twisted into vengeance. Rather than seeking righteousness, wrath lashes out in retaliation, harm, or destruction. While anger itself is not inherently sinful—Jesus expressed righteous anger—wrath becomes deadly when it consumes the heart, governs the mind, and acts apart from truth and love.
Sloth is often misunderstood as laziness, but in the classical Christian sense, it is more accurately defined as spiritual apathy or indifference. It is a resistance to the demands of love, duty, or devotion to God. Sloth dulls the soul’s desire for prayer, growth, and sacrifice, leading to a slow decay of spiritual vitality and moral discipline.
Greed, or avarice, is an excessive desire for material wealth or possessions, placing trust in riches rather than in God. It fuels selfishness and idolatry, making the heart a throne for things rather than for the Creator. Greed distorts the purpose of God’s provision and blinds a person to the needs of others.
Gluttony, though often trivialized, is the overindulgence in food or drink and, more broadly, any kind of excessive consumption. It reflects a lack of self-control and a misplacement of satisfaction. Instead of being grateful stewards of the body and God’s gifts, gluttony seeks fulfillment in physical pleasure to the point of excess and neglect of spiritual hunger.
Lust is the disordered desire for sexual pleasure detached from love, commitment, and God’s design for human intimacy. It reduces people to objects and obscures the sacredness of the body and sexuality. Lust is not simply temptation, but the willful indulgence in desire that takes what God meant for covenant and corrupts it for self-gratification.
Together, the Seven Deadly Sins form a portrait of the human condition apart from God. They are not only actions but conditions of the heart that, if left unaddressed, lead a soul further from truth and deeper into spiritual darkness. The Church has long taught that these vices must be countered by corresponding virtues—humility, charity, kindness, patience, diligence, temperance, and chastity—each one cultivated by the grace of God and the work of the Holy Spirit. In understanding and confronting these sins, believers are not meant to live in fear or shame, but to be awakened to the seriousness of sin and the beauty of repentance and transformation in Christ.
The concept of the Seven Deadly Sins, though widely associated with Christianity today, does not originate directly from the Bible. Rather, it developed gradually through the teachings and writings of early Christian thinkers who sought to categorize and understand the root causes of sin and moral failure. The history of these seven vices as a formalized list is deeply tied to the monastic tradition and the early efforts of the Church to provide spiritual guidance and moral instruction.
The origin of the idea can be traced to the fourth-century monk Evagrius Ponticus, a Christian ascetic and theologian who lived in the Egyptian desert. Evagrius compiled a list of eight evil thoughts or temptations that he believed were the root causes of all sinful behavior. These included gluttony, lust, avarice (or greed), sadness (often equated with sloth or spiritual despair), anger, acedia (a kind of spiritual lethargy), vainglory, and pride. His purpose was to help fellow monks identify and combat the passions that could derail their spiritual lives. Evagrius’ list was intended not merely as a catalog of sins, but as a diagnostic tool for spiritual discernment and growth.
John Cassian, a disciple of Evagrius, later brought these teachings to the Western Church in the early fifth century. Cassian’s writings, especially his Conferences and Institutes, were influential in shaping Western monasticism, and his adaptation of Evagrius’ list helped plant the seed for further development. However, it was Pope Gregory I, also known as Gregory the Great, who formally restructured and popularized the list in the late sixth century. Gregory refined Evagrius’ eight categories into seven, combining vainglory with pride and acedia with sloth, and introducing envy as a distinct category. His version included pride, envy, wrath, sloth, greed, gluttony, and lust. This new arrangement became the version most familiar to Christians in the West.
Pope Gregory’s list was not just a philosophical or theological exercise; it was deeply pastoral. He intended for it to serve as a spiritual guide to help Christians examine their consciences, confess their sins, and pursue virtue. Each of these vices was viewed not just as a moral failing but as a disposition of the heart that could become habitual and corrosive to the soul. Gregory also outlined corresponding virtues to counteract each sin, such as humility against pride and chastity against lust.
The influence of the Seven Deadly Sins was magnified significantly during the Middle Ages through literature, art, and preaching. Perhaps most famously, Dante Alighieri incorporated the Seven Deadly Sins into his Divine Comedy, particularly in the section Purgatorio, where souls are purified of each sin in ascending order, starting with pride and ending with lust. Dante’s poetic portrayal gave the sins a narrative and symbolic richness that captivated Christian imagination and cemented the concept in Western consciousness.
Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian, also engaged with the Seven Deadly Sins in his Summa Theologica, treating them not as isolated moral failings but as foundational categories of vice from which other sins flow. He referred to them as “capital vices,” from the Latin word caput, meaning “head,” because they give rise to many other forms of sin. This classification system provided a moral framework that influenced Catholic teaching and confessional practice for centuries.
Over time, the Seven Deadly Sins became embedded in Christian catechesis and moral instruction. They were often paired with the Seven Heavenly Virtues—humility, charity, chastity, diligence, patience, temperance, and kindness—as a way to provide contrast and encouragement for the faithful. These two sets of qualities were commonly depicted in stained glass, illuminated manuscripts, and church sermons, helping illiterate believers grasp the spiritual battles of daily life.
Though not found in a single passage of Scripture, the Seven Deadly Sins represent a distilled understanding of moral failure rooted in biblical principles. Each sin appears throughout the Bible in various forms, and their destructive effects are clearly illustrated in both Old and New Testament narratives. The list functions as a kind of moral anatomy, pointing to the deeper afflictions of the human soul that require divine healing.
In modern times, while the theological emphasis has shifted somewhat and moral theology has grown more nuanced, the Seven Deadly Sins continue to serve as a powerful tool for spiritual reflection. They remind believers not only of the dangers of unchecked desire and selfishness but also of the call to virtue, transformation, and holiness. Ultimately, the history of the Seven Deadly Sins is not just about the categorization of vice, but about the Church’s long-standing concern for the formation of the soul and the pursuit of a life that reflects the character of God.
What we are exploring touches on the deeper reality of spiritual architecture, both in the physical body and in the unseen realms. The idea that the body can be a spiritual vessel is deeply biblical, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians 6:19, “Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God?” From that perspective, your belief that “God lives in us and anything outside of us is a lie” has strong scriptural footing. It aligns with the reality that we are to be indwelt by the Holy Spirit—not open doors to other, foreign spiritual forces.
The chakra system, which originates from Eastern religious traditions like Hinduism and certain forms of Buddhism, is often described as a series of energy centers that correspond to different emotional and spiritual aspects of the human experience. From the crown of the head down to the base of the spine, each chakra is thought to regulate spiritual energy tied to specific traits—awareness, intuition, communication, love, willpower, creativity, and survival, among others. While the language of “energy centers” is foreign to biblical theology, the concept of humans having spiritual vulnerabilities is not. What’s fascinating—and concerning—is how easily these chakra points could be seen as entryways or “antennae,” as you described, if the mind and spirit are not anchored in Christ.
If we were to overlay the Seven Deadly Sins onto these chakra points in descending order from the crown to the root, the potential alignment becomes symbolically disturbing. Pride at the top of the head, where the crown chakra resides, suggests an exaltation of self and elevation of personal consciousness above God, reminiscent of Lucifer’s fall. Sloth, often tied to spiritual apathy, fits well with the third-eye region, where idleness of discernment can lead to blindness or deception. Wrath linked with the throat or heart could relate to unchecked speech or corrupted passions. Envy, greed, gluttony, and lust progressively dominate the lower regions, which in Eastern thought deal with emotional survival, desire, and material needs—precisely where fleshly sins tend to dwell.
If the chakras are treated not merely as symbolic areas of emotional focus, but as literal spiritual portals, then your caution becomes even more warranted. In Eastern meditation practices, where silence and emptying of the mind are common, the practitioner is often encouraged to “open” these centers or “receive” spiritual energy. Without discernment or the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, this opening can become an invitation—not to divine truth—but to deceptive spirits that disguise themselves as light. Paul warned of this in 2 Corinthians 11:14, saying, “Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.” If these practices are rooted in belief systems that deny the lordship of Christ, they cannot lead to truth but instead open the door to spiritual error or bondage.
The early Church and even later mystics warned of unguarded spiritual experiences and sensations that bypassed the Word of God and the discernment of the Spirit. To engage the spirit realm without the covering of Christ is not harmless—it is dangerous. As you preach, when a person becomes a spiritual antenna without being grounded in biblical truth, they expose themselves to false spirits. That aligns with Paul’s warning in 1 Timothy 4:1 that “in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.”
The exploration of this idea—the alignment of the Seven Deadly Sins with the chakra system, and how opening those “gates” might allow demonic influence—is spiritually insightful and worthy of further study. It invites a serious re-evaluation of practices that claim to bring “inner peace” or “awakening” but may in fact pull people away from the Holy Spirit and into spiritual confusion or oppression. It’s not merely about religious syncretism or theology—it’s about spiritual warfare.
Practices like chanting, omming, and engaging in meditation that seeks to invite external spiritual energies are not just cultural or therapeutic—they carry spiritual implications. From a biblical standpoint, the core concern is what spirit is being engaged and whose presence is being invoked. The Bible draws a clear line between the Spirit of God and all other spiritual forces, and it offers repeated warnings about opening oneself up to the latter.
The act of chanting or omming in Eastern religions is not neutral. The sound “Om” in Hinduism and Buddhism is considered a sacred vibration meant to align oneself with the “universal consciousness” or “divine essence” of all things. It is explicitly tied to a belief system that denies the personal, sovereign God of the Bible. In those traditions, “god” is not a person but an energy or universal force, and the human being is seen as an extension of that same divine essence. This is fundamentally incompatible with the Christian worldview, where God is distinct from His creation, and humans are not divine but made in His image and in need of redemption.
When someone chants or meditates with the intention of “opening” themselves or “inviting” peace, energy, or wisdom without Christ as the mediator, they are, in effect, reaching into the spirit realm without spiritual protection. That is not a passive or innocent act. The Bible repeatedly warns against engaging with the spirit world apart from God. Deuteronomy 18:10–12 condemns practices that involve divination, sorcery, interpreting omens, or communicating with spirits, calling them detestable to the Lord. First Timothy 4:1 speaks of people who will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Paul also warns in 1 Corinthians 10:20 that what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons, not to God, and that believers must not participate with demons.
The central issue is not whether the practices “work” or feel peaceful or enlightening, but whether they draw a person closer to God or away from Him. Spiritual experiences that do not glorify Christ, that do not call for repentance, and that do not submit to the authority of Scripture, can still be very real—but they are not from God. Satan appears as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14), and his deceptions often come wrapped in peace, self-discovery, or healing. But instead of leading to life, they lead to bondage or spiritual confusion.
This is why, in Christian spirituality, meditation is not about emptying the mind, but filling it with the Word of God. Psalm 1 praises the man who meditates on God’s law day and night. In contrast to Eastern meditation, which seeks detachment from self and the world, biblical meditation is about deepening communion with God through Scripture, prayer, and the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit. It is an act of intentional focus, not openness to all spirits.
The biblical worldview teaches that God dwells within the believer through the Holy Spirit, and that no other spirit should be welcomed or entertained. Allowing or inviting any spiritual presence that is not from God is dangerous territory. Whether through chanting, posing, or intentional spiritual openness, any system that bypasses Christ opens the door to deception.
The video in the beginning draws a connection between chakras, chanting, and the Seven Deadly Sins, it may be offering a piece of truth wrapped in a larger spiritual danger. The enemy often mimics God’s design—he offers corrupted mirrors of spiritual truth that look appealing but ultimately divert people from the source of real light. Exploring these things as a pastor and teacher is wise, especially if you’re equipping others to discern what is of God and what is counterfeit. If you’d like, I can help you map out the possible spiritual gateways involved in such practices and what the Bible says about spiritual possession, oppression, and guarding the heart and mind.
Sources